Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

My Princess Boy
moonbattery.com ^ | 04/26/2011 | Van Helsing

Posted on 04/26/2011 11:05:13 AM PDT by massmike

Have a bucket handy — it's time to take a peek under the rock of progressive culture. The Facebook page My Princess Boy does the J. Crew ads one better...... by offering a public reservoir of photographs of little boys dressed up like girls by their moonbat mommies.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: boyhood; childabuse; feminazis; genderconfused; homosexualagenda; liberalism; mentaldisorder; nambla; napl; savethemales; sexpositiveagenda; sexualizingchildren; transexual; transvestite
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 last
To: massmike

You gotta be $h!tt!ng me. Unf#@%ing believable. Boy named Sue brought to real life.


61 posted on 04/27/2011 12:23:37 PM PDT by Darren McCarty (I am not lead by any politician. I am my own leader.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

Anyone seen how many boys names are unisex today?? Look at baby names book, and you’ll see Michael is now a unisex name.

Ashley was a boys name and now it is considered a ‘UNISEX’ name. Another way of Feminizing boys of America by LIBERALS!!!


62 posted on 04/27/2011 1:47:40 PM PDT by ExCTCitizen (Palin/Bachman 2012 (what will the NAGS say??? :-) ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike
Jeez...

I went to that facebook page and I believe some parents are abusive. Yes a small minority of children are intersexed and yes I love pastal colors, but wearing a pink shirt is not the same as wearing a PINK DRESS.

Parents, if you saw a boy in your neighborhood dressed in a dress, what would YOU DO?

63 posted on 04/27/2011 3:02:07 PM PDT by ExCTCitizen (Palin/Bachman 2012 (what will the NAGS say??? :-) ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
Science shows that plastics in our water and food affects the sexual development of soft bodied animals, including us.

That was debunked several years ago. There are higher levels of endocrine disruptors in soybeans. Perhaps those moonbat moms were giving the boys too much tofu...

64 posted on 04/27/2011 3:41:08 PM PDT by Squawk 8888 (Will work for chocolate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

65 posted on 04/27/2011 4:49:16 PM PDT by TheOldLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: TheOldLady

Make mine a double.


66 posted on 04/27/2011 5:01:20 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows (You can't have Ingsoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Carley

women who hate men and only wanted daughters so they are reinforcing girlish behavior. This was all covered in a book entitled “sissy boy syndrome”

This is plain child abuse.


67 posted on 04/27/2011 5:03:58 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Obama the early years...


68 posted on 04/27/2011 5:06:35 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

The bottle is yours.


69 posted on 04/27/2011 5:07:57 PM PDT by TheOldLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

This is Franklin Delano Roosevelt, c. 1884. Children were generally considered sexless until about World War I, and it was only with the Baby Boomers that dressing boys and girls like little men and women became the norm. For centuries, preschool-aged children of both genders wore white dresses; easier to bleach, and easier to change diapers.

Smithsonian article here.

70 posted on 04/27/2011 5:23:38 PM PDT by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ExCTCitizen

...and Shirley was a BOY’S name, until a little blonde urchin in skirts hit the Big Screen.

The “gender” of names has always been somewhat fluid; they weren’t set in cement the day you were born.


71 posted on 04/27/2011 8:57:49 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (Made in America, by proud American citizens, in 1946.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

Loving me some of your graphic. lol


72 posted on 04/28/2011 12:16:37 AM PDT by dixiechick2000 (Age, skill, wisdom, and a little treachery always overcome youth and arrogance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: dixiechick2000

Great art comes from the soul.


73 posted on 04/28/2011 2:07:52 AM PDT by Slings and Arrows (You can't have Ingsoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: ApplegateRanch
Ditto "Beverly." Florence King talks about it in Southern Ladies and Gentlemen.
74 posted on 04/28/2011 2:11:00 AM PDT by Slings and Arrows (You can't have Ingsoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: massmike

These women need to arrested and charged with abuse.


75 posted on 04/28/2011 2:39:11 AM PDT by verga (I am not an apologist, I just play one on Television)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ApplegateRanch
...and Shirley was a BOY’S name, until a little blonde urchin in skirts hit the Big Screen. The “gender” of names has always been somewhat fluid; they weren’t set in cement the day you were born.

True...

76 posted on 04/28/2011 11:00:51 AM PDT by ExCTCitizen (Palin/Bachman 2012 (what will the NAGS say??? :-) ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: ApplegateRanch
...and Shirley was a BOY’S name, until a little blonde urchin in skirts hit the Big Screen.

Surely, you can't be serious.

77 posted on 04/28/2011 11:02:51 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

yes I am... and Don’t call me SHIRLEY!!


78 posted on 04/28/2011 11:04:39 AM PDT by ExCTCitizen (Palin/Bachman 2012 (what will the NAGS say??? :-) ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson