Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BC? Big Deal. He's still not a Constitutional Natural Born Citizen
The Radio Patriot ^ | April 27, 2011 | Andrea Shea King

Posted on 04/27/2011 8:26:51 AM PDT by patriotgal1787

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

1 posted on 04/27/2011 8:26:56 AM PDT by patriotgal1787
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787

(page 246)
And the constitution itself contains a direct recognition of the subsisting common law principle, in the section which defines the qualification of the President. “No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of this constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President,” &c. The only standard which then existed, of a natural born citizen, was the rule of the common law, and no different standard has been adopted since. Suppose a person should be elected President who was native born, but of alien parents, could there be any reasonable doubt that he was eligible under the constitution? I think not.

(pg 250)
6. Upon principle, therefore, I can entertain no doubt, but that by the law of the United States, every person born within the dominions and allegiance of the United States, whatever were the situation of his parents, is a natural born citizen.

http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/Lynch_v_Clarke_1844_ocr.pdf


2 posted on 04/27/2011 8:28:13 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (Poor history is better than good fiction, and anything with lots of horses is better still)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787

The major precedent is against you. Although Vice President and President had an Irish father (a well known fact at the time) nobody was curious enough to ask him if the father was a citizen at the time of Arthur’s birth. Why not? You have two choices: either people in 1880 were idiots compared to current Americans (yeah, right) or they didn’t think this issue had any bearing on Arthur’s eligibility.


3 posted on 04/27/2011 8:30:10 AM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787

The major precedent is against you. Although Vice President and President had an Irish father (a well known fact at the time) nobody was curious enough to ask him if the father was a citizen at the time of Arthur’s birth. Why not? You have two choices: either people in 1880 were idiots compared to current Americans (yeah, right) or they didn’t think this issue had any bearing on Arthur’s eligibility.


4 posted on 04/27/2011 8:30:19 AM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787

I meant Vice President and President Arthur....but you can gather that from the rest of the post.


5 posted on 04/27/2011 8:35:03 AM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk
Is the letter from John Jay to George Washington regarding the term “Natural Born Citizen” worth anything?
6 posted on 04/27/2011 8:36:41 AM PDT by frogjerk (I believe in unicorns, fairies and pro-life Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787
Obama didn't release anything new. He released the same old COLB.

The acronym COLB stands for "Certificate of Live Birth."

Look at the top of the released document:

What does it say?

If The Donald does not make a big stink about this, it means he's a stalking-horse for Hussein, meant to inoculate him from further birth certificate inquiries.

7 posted on 04/27/2011 8:36:50 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (When and why did Steve Dunham change his name to Barack Hussein Obama? When he converted to Islam?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

What is it you’re looking for?


8 posted on 04/27/2011 8:41:01 AM PDT by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787

Odd that Obamas alleged long form bc does not look like any of the others born in Hawaii at that time. It also appears cropped. It looks like the one they have been passing off as the real thing the last few days. It also has some written numbers on certain boxes.


9 posted on 04/27/2011 8:41:06 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I see you’re still having comprehension problems.


10 posted on 04/27/2011 8:41:17 AM PDT by Hiro Protaginast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
The answer is: To Americans, "YES";
but to the traitors in SCOTUS and Congress
not so much.

On July 25th, 1787, John Jay wrote to George Washington, then Presiding Officer of the Constitutional Convention:

"“Permit me to hint, whether it would be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Commander in Chief of the American Army shall not be given to nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.”

The Convention agreed and without debate the provision suggested by Jay was written into the Constitution.

That Jay’s advice was taken is not surprising because in his career Jay was President of the Continental Congress, Chief Justice of the New York Supreme Court, 1st Chief Justice of the United States, Ambassador to Spain and France, Secretary of Foreign Affairs (Secretary of State) and Governor of New York, among other things. He wasn’t a man whose advice could be ignored. Note that what particularly concerned Jay was not a political issue but a military issue arising because the President is Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the United States. He was bothered by issues of National Security."


11 posted on 04/27/2011 8:42:19 AM PDT by Diogenesis ( Vi veri veniversum vivus vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hiro Protaginast

So you’re saying the COLB released today is a long-form birth certificate?


12 posted on 04/27/2011 8:43:44 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (When and why did Steve Dunham change his name to Barack Hussein Obama? When he converted to Islam?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

It is identical to the Nordyke birth certificates. Those are the one’s that his BC was suppose to look like.


13 posted on 04/27/2011 8:44:57 AM PDT by Coyotehockey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Obama didn't release anything new. He released the same old COLB. The acronym COLB stands for "Certificate of Live Birth."

I agree the one presented to day is a forgery but not for the reason you state. The State of Hawaii defines a birth certificate as either the long form Certificate of Live Birth or the short form Certification of Live Birth. COLB is an acronym for both.
14 posted on 04/27/2011 8:45:22 AM PDT by Defend Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Jr. played Trump with this fake out. Obama specifically requested link two copies of his COLB . . not his long form birth certificate on April 22. The msm is playing this up knowing too few are aware of the difference between a long form and COLB. That Trump and his crew haven't yet caught/remarked on this detail indicates Trump may be a player in Jr.'s game.
15 posted on 04/27/2011 8:46:23 AM PDT by wtd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787
Obama is not a natural born citizen. He cannot be, because his father was Kenyan and a British subject

Obama's a citizen because he was born in Hawaii. It doesn't matter where his parents were born.

16 posted on 04/27/2011 8:50:28 AM PDT by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
Why do you keep posting this meaningless quote? How much is Obama paying you?

If and when this gets to SCOTUS, dozens of opinions showing just the opposite of yours will be presented. I am not going to waste my time to see if your wordy document is even relevant.

Your argument that parents citizenship is irrelevant is ridiculous.

17 posted on 04/27/2011 8:52:13 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts ma'am, just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wtd

my questions are, if as we have heard for the 4 previous yrs on this issue, Obama had already provided this document and it was a settled matter, why didn’t he still have the document? Meaning, why did he have to go ask for it again? And, if it takes weeks and weeks and weeks and man hours such as Jeffrey Toobin and Anderson Cooper and panel said, does that mean it was requested back in late March? Certainly someone who has travelled as extensively, been educated in the most prestigious halls and been in such position of power (State Senator) prior. Certainly such a person would have had to provide this document at some time in the past.


18 posted on 04/27/2011 8:53:29 AM PDT by sappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: patriotgal1787

How do take focus off high gas prices? Birth issue
How do take focus off high unemployment rate? Birth issue
How do take focus off the value of the dollar? Birth issue
How do take focus off problems in middle east? Birth issue
How do take focus off ____________? Birth issue
How do take focus off ____________? Birth issue
How do take focus off ____________? Birth issue
How do take focus off ____________? Birth issue
How do take focus off ____________? Birth issue

Like Rahm Emanuel said, “You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it’s an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.”

I would venture to say this crisis is Obama’s birth issue. With everyone focusing on his birth issue, the true problems are put on the back burner, and all the real issues are dealt with using “Under the table negotiations”

Now his birth certificate maybe bogus. But it comes at a time when other problems need to be addressed. Let’s wait until the 2012 election and then declare him ineligible to run. Hold his feet to the fire on the real issues now!


19 posted on 04/27/2011 8:53:40 AM PDT by drinktheobamakoolaid (When do replace an empty suit...November 6, 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Is there any document release that could end this debate?


20 posted on 04/27/2011 8:55:17 AM PDT by worst-case scenario (Striving to reach the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson