Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USDA Shakes Down Missouri Family
A Semi-News/Semi-Satire from AzConservative ^ | 21 May 2011 | John Semmens

Posted on 05/23/2011 5:04:34 PM PDT by John Semmens

What started out as a hobby for their son and turned into a family side-business grossing $4600 (with a net profit of $200 after expenses) last year has landed John Dollarhite of Missouri in a heap of trouble. For the “crime” of selling more than $500 worth of rabbits in a single year, Dollarhite has been hit with a $90,643 fine and been warned that the penalty could go as high as $3.9 million.

US Department of Agriculture spokesman Robert Crook explained that “if you sell more than $500 worth of rabbits in any given year you have to have a license from our Department. Dollarhite didn’t have a license. So we assessed a preliminary fine of $146 for each rabbit he sold last year.”

Crook added that “Dollarhite would be well-advised to pay what we are asking. We are authorized to impose a fine of up to $10,000 per rabbit. And we could include penalties for earlier years if we so choose.”

It doesn’t matter that Dollarhite was unaware that he supposedly needed a federal license nor that the punishment is way out of proportion to the alleged offense. “Ignorance of the law is no excuse,” Crook reminded. “Besides, we’re being merciful here. The guy can take out a loan or sell his house to raise the $90,000. We could’ve crushed him with a multi-million dollar penalty if we’d wanted to.”

read more articles...

http://azconserv1.wordpress.com/2011/05/21/wrangling-over-the-war-powers-act/


TOPICS: Agriculture; Government; Humor; Pets/Animals
KEYWORDS: nannystate; oppression; regulation; satire
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: humblegunner

Did you even read what Jim wrote about bloggers?
Didn’t think so.


21 posted on 05/23/2011 6:27:16 PM PDT by Kirkwood (Zombie Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Kirkwood; humblegunner

LOL!


22 posted on 05/23/2011 6:33:42 PM PDT by Eaker (The problem with the internet, you're never sure of the accuracy of the quotes. Abraham Lincoln '65)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

If I lost my house due to some public servant on a power trip, that public servant would find out just how dangerous a man without an address can be.


23 posted on 05/23/2011 6:34:33 PM PDT by domeika
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wuli
If it is not “interstate commerce” how does the USDA get in the picture?

Everything is interstate commerce.

Understand?


24 posted on 05/23/2011 6:48:54 PM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on its own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

FICTION BECOMES A FACT WITH BIG GOVERNMENT


25 posted on 05/23/2011 7:01:57 PM PDT by LetMarch (If a man knows the right way to live, and does not live it, there is no greater coward. (Anonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

More Info:

http://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_welfare/downloads/aw/awlicreg.pdf

http://www.homesteadingtoday.com/filez/Rabbit_info.doc


26 posted on 05/23/2011 7:07:10 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens
There are consequences for being a Rabbit Pimp.../Sarcasm
27 posted on 05/23/2011 7:07:42 PM PDT by Recon by Fire (Obama is a dude posing as another dude, who is impersonating another dude!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

The standard argument is that the person who bought an in-state rabbit might otherwise have bought and interstate rabbit. Thus, the entirely local transaction has potential impacts on interstate commerce.

It’s a weak argument, but the courts bought it 70 years ago and we’re stuck with it.


28 posted on 05/23/2011 8:20:40 PM PDT by John Semmens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

In this nation we’re living in an enstrangling, Kafkaesque world of regulations and repressive statutes.

My teenage nephew had an idea how to make money: he would start his own auto detailing business.

First thing he encountered were the myriad taxes. Very depressing.

Then he was told by the city it was illegal to wash automobiles in a driveway. No joke! If vehicles are washed on a hard surface, the runoff must be captured and stored until disposed of as polluted liquid waste.

THEN he was told there was an 8 vehicle limit to how many vehicles he could process in one week.

I reared him to be a conservative Republican. The government is Hellbent on making him into an enemy of the state.


29 posted on 05/24/2011 12:03:28 AM PDT by SatinDoll (NOT FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

Liberals hate the death penalty but are addicted to wildly disproportionate punishment for other crimes. This is one of them and for a first time offender no less!

This is cruel and unusual punishment


30 posted on 05/24/2011 2:03:59 AM PDT by dennisw (NZT - "works better if you're already smart")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kirkwood
Did you mean this part? I have no complaint if a good conservative blogger posts his own material to FR, not as an excerpt to drive hits and discussion back to his blog, but rather to impart useful information to OUR readers and to promote and join in on the discussion and conservative activism HERE on FR.
31 posted on 05/24/2011 5:43:21 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Have you noticed the size limit on postings got smaller in the fairly recent past?

And I’m not telling anyone any news about Righthaven save for yourself.


32 posted on 05/24/2011 9:45:36 AM PDT by MeganC (NO WAR FOR OIL! ........except when a Democrat's in charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

The topic is blogs being excerpted, not news sources.
The writer of a blog post has no reason to excerpt any of it.


33 posted on 05/24/2011 9:47:35 AM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

>>>The writer of a blog post has no reason to excerpt any of it.<<<

Ah. My humble apologies. I see your point now that the good fellow is just blogwhoring for page counts.

*Mea culpa. Mea maxima culpa.*


34 posted on 05/24/2011 9:52:19 AM PDT by MeganC (NO WAR FOR OIL! ........except when a Democrat's in charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson