Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists cure cancer, but no one takes notice
hub pages ^ | 25-may-2011 | cgull8m

Posted on 05/25/2011 2:48:50 PM PDT by OL Hickory

Canadian researchers find a simple cure for cancer, but major pharmaceutical companies are not interested.

Researchers at the University of Alberta, in Edmonton, Canada have cured cancer last week, yet there is a little ripple in the news or in TV. It is a simple technique using very basic drug. The method employs dichloroacetate, which is currently used to treat metabolic disorders. So, there is no concern of side effects or about their long term effects.

(Excerpt) Read more at hubpages.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Education; Health/Medicine; Society
KEYWORDS: cancer; cancercure; cares; curecancer; cured; dca; health; medicine; science; who
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 05/25/2011 2:48:53 PM PDT by OL Hickory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory

Seems like Cancer has been “cured” more times than I can count, based on accounts heard in the media.


2 posted on 05/25/2011 2:52:38 PM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory
Assuming this stuff really works as advertised, consider that insurance companies and the medical community each have plenty of motivation to use this treatment.

I get suspicious when I read this kind of article and the author appears to use it as a club to beat on pharmaceutical companies.

3 posted on 05/25/2011 2:57:40 PM PDT by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory
This was posted recently but I can't find that thread. I did find the thread from 2007: Cheap, safe drug kills most cancers
4 posted on 05/25/2011 3:07:16 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory

Idiotic drivel from the antitechnological mystics.


5 posted on 05/25/2011 3:10:40 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory

—yeah—use it with peach pits—(sarc)


6 posted on 05/25/2011 3:18:32 PM PDT by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the media or government says about firearms or explosives--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Sordo
Assuming this stuff really works as advertised, consider that insurance companies and the medical community each have plenty of motivation to use this treatment. I get suspicious when I read this kind of article and the author appears to use it as a club to beat on pharmaceutical companies.

Ditto. However, I had a science teacher back in high school who was a former cancer research professor at a major university. He became very jaded and left the industry to teach high school. He told us that he had worked on three major research projects where they came very close to developing treatments that would cure cancer. Just when they reached the next to the last major milestone/goal, their funding would get cut. He was convinced that cancer treatment is purely big business and those doing the treating don't want a cheap drug.

7 posted on 05/25/2011 3:20:13 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. *4192*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory

See the DCA Site:

http://www.thedcasite.com/


8 posted on 05/25/2011 3:22:22 PM PDT by Madam Theophilus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory

The referenced article is from 2007.

A small clinical trial was done at Univ Alberta - 50 patients - “inconclusive” results.

Don’t hold your breath on this one...


9 posted on 05/25/2011 3:24:00 PM PDT by paterfamilias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Makes sense. So which sort of entity will eventually come up with a “cure for cancer”? Certainly not by the government.


10 posted on 05/25/2011 3:29:22 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Insurance companies are the only group who would benefit financially from a cheap drug. Pharmaceutical companies and the NIH fund most private and university research programs. So I can’t even guess at an answer to your question.


11 posted on 05/25/2011 3:37:38 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. *4192*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Maybe an organization like Susan B. Komen can focus some attention on the issue if they really are interested in a “race for the cure.”


12 posted on 05/25/2011 3:40:05 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. *4192*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Susan G. Komen foundation is too busy funding Planned Parenthood (and their abortion induced breast cancer incidence) with our donations to worry about any cures.


13 posted on 05/25/2011 3:45:16 PM PDT by rbbeachkid (Get out of its way and small business can fix the economy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory
You mean the one and only Cancer? You do know there are several types of skin on your body. Your insides are not all the same.
14 posted on 05/25/2011 4:03:53 PM PDT by Domangart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan
I'm not commenting on the validity of the drug mentioned. May or may not be real.

But consider the impact a cheap cure for cancer will have on social security and other political & social structures.

There often seems to be more groups advocating a mass die off of the human race & population control than advocating practical life extension.

Who knows what forces are actually at work behind the scenes on cancer cures and other life-extension issues.

15 posted on 05/25/2011 4:10:31 PM PDT by sjmjax (Politicans are like bananas - they start out green, turn yellow, then rot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory

Why are Americans always the last to know these things.
apparently there are trials in many Countries.

“OUTRAGE IN BELGIUM! (25 Oct. 2008)

After the news story in the Belgium press of two terminally ill cancer patients who used DCA and are now on the road to recovery, the Belgium people are asking questions. “It has brought a lot commotion in Belgium. All the people are wondering why they haven’t heard from DCA any sooner! And they wonder why it isn’t recognized yet as an official medicine for cancer! They are shocked!” (additional Belgium link) (Google-translated English versions 1, 2) “
http://thedcasite.com/


16 posted on 05/25/2011 4:22:38 PM PDT by Marty62 (Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory

If it really works, the health insurance companies will jump on it. Cancer is expensive.


17 posted on 05/25/2011 6:35:32 PM PDT by Ellendra (Remember the Battle of Athens, Tennessee: Aug. 2, 1946)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory
The references noted are several years old. Is there any recent updates or studies to validate the earlier data?
18 posted on 05/25/2011 6:36:56 PM PDT by Keen-Minded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OL Hickory
Did they find this out before or after they turned Lead into Gold and Water into Gasoline?
19 posted on 05/25/2011 6:39:49 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (If Sarah Palin was President, you would have a job by now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

DCA patent.

Viral Genetics (Symbol: VRAL) reports that a patent under which it is exclusively licensed, will be granted for using a compound known as DCA to treat cancer. DCA (dichloroacetic acid) has emerged as a compound that accelerates the destruction of tumors without the deleterious and debilitating side effects associated with chemotherapy or radiation. This is the first patent granted for the use of DCA to treat cancer, and represents a significant milestone in the company’s growth.

The United States Patent and Trade Office has announced that the patent calling for the use of Dichloroacetate (DCA) to treat Cancer will be issued to the University of Colorado (CU) - and licensed exclusively to Viral Genetics - as a result of the invention filed by Viral Genetics’ Lead Scientist, Dr. M. Karen Newell Rogers during her tenure at CU. Newell Rogers originally filed the patent application in 2003, based on research work she and colleagues had done relating to “systems and methods for treating human inflammatory and proliferative diseases and wounds, with fatty acid metabolism inhibitors and/or glycolytic inhibitors”. Her work has resulted in the granting of patent number 8,071,645, which will issue on December 6, 2011.

Full Release: http://markets.financialcontent.com/demo/?GUID=20016974&Page=MediaViewer&Ticker=VRAL


20 posted on 11/22/2011 10:51:18 AM PST by rolandrickperry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson