Posted on 06/18/2011 7:17:41 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
I always thought it was creepy the way Barack Hussein Obama has repeatedly referred to the likelihood of his being a one-term President. It is as if he knew, even as he campaigned in 2008, that all the loose ends and unanswered questions about his life would eventually disqualify him.
It is now widely acknowledged that the mainstream media ran interference for him, ignoring or disparaging those who questioned his eligibility.
After two and a half years in office, however, his arrogance and incompetence is so manifest that even they can no longer cover for him.
Obama has single handedly generated a mass political movement called the Tea Party and election results for governors and members of Congress have put opposition candidates into office.
On March 31, 1968, then-President Lyndon B. Johnson announced that he would not run for reelection, responding to the massive opposition to the war in Vietnam. On August 9, 1974, Richard M. Nixon announced his resignation in the wake of the Watergate scandal to avoid impeachment.
I predict that Barack Hussein Obama will resign before the end of his first term. He may well do so prior to the September 2012 Democratic Party convention.
Obama was never eligible to run for the office. In his book, Wheres the Birth Certificate? The Case that Barack Obama is Not Eligible to be President, Dr. Jerome R. Corsi, Phd, devotes 387 pages, complete with appendices and endnotes, to irrefutably make that case.
Anyone who reads Article 2, Section 1, of the Constitution, however, can make that case in less than a minute. Only a natural born individual whose both parents were American citizens can be President. Obamas father was a citizen of Kenya. There is no dispute regarding what the Founders meant when they said natural born.
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
The more honest birthers I've talked to say that it's a piece of knowledge that was forgotten for almost 200 years. It wasn't until they started digging that they found this hidden knowledge of the Founding Fathers. It's all very exciting, like The Da Vinci Code.
I will believe it when I see it.
“There is no dispute regarding what the Founders meant when they said ?natural born.??
Really? “No dispute”?
Well, that’s a relief. I’m sure the 535 Members of Congress and 9 Supreme Court justices who approved his election, who swore him in, and who have denied cert on every conceivable suit alleging this would be surprised that it’s so clear.
“There is no dispute regarding what the Founders meant when they said ?natural born.??
Really? “No dispute”?
Well, that’s a relief. I’m sure the 535 Members of Congress and 9 Supreme Court justices who approved his election, who swore him in, and who have denied cert on every conceivable suit alleging this would be surprised that it’s so clear.
“There is no dispute regarding what the Founders meant when they said ?natural born.??
Really? “No dispute”?
Well, that’s a relief. I’m sure the 535 Members of Congress and 9 Supreme Court justices who approved his election, who swore him in, and who have denied cert on every conceivable suit alleging this would be surprised that it’s so clear.
“There is no dispute regarding what the Founders meant when they said ?natural born.??
Really? “No dispute”?
Well, that’s a relief. I’m sure the 535 Members of Congress and 9 Supreme Court justices who approved his election, who swore him in, and who have denied cert on every conceivable suit alleging this would be surprised that it’s so clear.
They're all O-bots. Every last one of 'em!
No, only about half. The Democrats are so evil that they would run a full fledged foreigner if they thought they could get away with it. (Party of Slavery, Abortion Theft and Homosexuality.) But they ARE ignorant of their responsibilities because no one teaches this stuff nowadays.
Jim Noble wrote (four times): “Im sure the 535 Members of Congress and 9 Supreme Court justices who approved his election, who swore him in, and who have denied cert on every conceivable suit alleging this would be surprised that its so clear.”
Gena Bukin responded: “They’re all O-bots. Every last one of ‘em!”
Well, Gena, I don’t think that theory holds up. John G. Roberts, Chief Justice of the United States, is learned jurist, a gentleman, and no o-bot. President G.W Bush chose Roberts as a solid intellectual conservative.
Roberts has the top job in the judicial branch. The Chief Justice needs nothing from the President. The President can neither fire nor promote the Chief Justice. Roberts’ pay — tied with the Speaker of the House for second highest of federal officers — cannot be cut (Article III, Section 1, final clause).
Roberts holds his job is his for as long as we wants it and draws breath. Removing him against his will would take impeachment in the House and conviction in the Senate, and among the thousands of federal judges in our nations history, the number forced out is countable on one’s fingers and toes.
Gena, you implied that Chief Justice Roberts is an o-bot. We like to keep a civil forum, but that’s just nonsense. Roberts and Obama are political opponents. Neither needs the other’s approval. I dare say that as Chief Justice Roberts did not particularly want to elevate to the presidency one of the the 22 senators who voted *against* Roberts’ confirmation.
FewsOrange:
Windflier and SatinDoll are absolutely correct. The "both parents" argument was made long before the election.
Wonder why they were doin this?
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/06/09/a-conspiracy-to-change-the-natural-born-citizen-requirement/
This was to be the "Schwarzenegger Amendment" back when many Republicans viewed Arnold as the future of the party.
Hard to believe there was such a time but indeed there was.
From his lips to God's ears
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.