Even FOX News (especailly O'Reilly) is reporting this backwards.
Call them and complain!
We need to stop this "winner take all" primary method in GOP primaries. That is how we got McLame and Bob Dole
But it’s his turn and he has an R after his name. Come on people, get with the program. It’s for the good of the party.
What more do you need to know?
Romney can be nominated with 27 percent because the conservatives are divided again.
At this point it’s Rick Perry’s to loose; outside Palin throwing her hat in the ring.
His past will always be an albatross around his neck, no matter how much repenting he does.
I'm one of thoes.
Huntsman and Romney are topic of favor with Mika and Joe.
That says it all!
Don’t go away mad Mitt, just go away.
bill o’reilly runs an entertainment show.
his probing mind examines a nightely herd of moo cows.
What I'm hearing from most people is that they are holding out for the real deal.
>>> Romney LOSING in GOP polls, 73% want someone else
And even more then that want somebody else then the other listed alternatives including Palin and Bachman. So what’s your point? NONE of them has truly caught on.
Perry may see this as an opportunity. Don’t you think?
If Romney becomes the nominee, we voters will have a choice between Obama and his twin.
Boys and girls: We need a CONSERVATIVE!
I see Romney as a serious existential threat to the GOP and I don’t think there’s any reason to underestimate that. By your logic, 80-90% want someone other than any of the other alternatives, however, so I don’t really see what that gets us.
In a three way vote Sarah Palin could defeat them both and get over 50% of the vote.
In a two way election, Sarah Palin would get over 60% against either. Let Romney run as the Democrat he is.
A person cannot flip-flop on core principles, unless they are really core “expediencies”.
His RomneyCare (tm) shows that he does not understand the essential nature of personal liberty nor does he understand rational economics. This is the type of person who would authorize another TARP, just like Bush 43 did.
In that respect, Bush 43 advanced Medicare Part D (the free pills program) for seniors. In my opinion, this is in the same category as ObomaCare (tm) and RomneyCare(tm).
When it came down to crunch time, with both of these people, the answer was big and bigger government. We need a President whose first answer is one that respects the liberty and property of citizens.
(And if any reader sniffs at this, in each of the last three years, American taxpayers donated about $300 billion to charities. So there is plenty of money to fund the needs of those who are truly indigent, if only the right appeal was made to direct the voluntary donation of funds.
A simple approach would be to grant a 100% refundable tax credit for donations to qualified charities. Government would save money because charities like the Salvation Army have far lower overhead and are far more efficient at delivering services to the indigent than government monopoly agencies are. As donations rose to satisfy the level of need, the percent of tax credit could be trimmed back slowly to throttle funding. This is an approach that respects the liberty and property of those who have sufficient income to donate, yet fills the essential needs of the poor. But it does not fill the cravings of power for the brokers in Washington and that is why it has never been proposed.)
No Palin, No Romney. This New Yorker wants Allen West.
If Romney is nominated then it means we have one party rule in this country, because there will be no philosophical difference between the R's and the D's.
Well, that is exactly what is going to happen if it plays out like it did in 2008. Split conservative primary vote, plus crossover voting from Rats, RINO gets the nomination. It is a recipe for disaster, and about the only chance Obama has to win!