Skip to comments.JUSTIA.COM CAUGHT RED HANDED HIDING REFERENCES TO MINOR v. HAPPERSETT IN PUBLISHED SCOTUS OPINIONS
Posted on 07/01/2011 4:01:29 PM PDT by SatinDoll
The US Supreme Court Center at Justia.com is the leading resource on the internet which publishes United States Supreme Court decisions. They have been caught red handed in an Orwellian attempt to revise US Supreme Court cases which mention Minor v. Happersett as precedent on the issue of citizenship, as opposed to the other issue decided in Minor, voting rights.
I have documented two incredible examples where Justia.com has been caught in the act of taking a hatchet job to US Supreme Court decisions by removing, not just the case name, Minor v. Happersett, but whole passages related to Chief Justice Waites statements on the citizenship issue which were cited favorably in BOYD V. NEBRASKA EX REL. THAYER, 143 U. S. 135 (1892), and POPE V. WILLIAMS, 193 U. S. 621 (1904).
I have published my complete investigation into this fraud perpetrated by Justia.com including snapshots and evidence collected from the Way Back Machine at the Internet Archive in the comments section of my previous report, THE EXPRESS LANE TO NATURAL BORN CLARITY. My investigation was triggered by a readers comment regarding Boyd. The comment was on a separate issue. But I then noticed that the Boyd case, as currently published by Justia.com, made reference to Minor v. Happersett without properly naming the case.
This is beyond shocking. Somebody, back in 2008, just prior to the election, ordered these revisions and saw to their execution. This is direct tampering with United States law. And it is evidence that Minor v. Happersett was known to be a huge stumbling block to POTUS eligibility.
It confirms that Minor v. Happersett was seen as a dangerous US Supreme Court precedent which construed the natural-born citizen clause of Article 2 Section 1 to make only those persons born in the US to citizen parents (plural) eligible to be President.
According to binding US Supreme Court precedent, Obama is not eligible to be President. And we are obviously very late coming to this legal truth. Somebody at Justia.com tried to control and alter our awareness by hiding important Supreme Court references to Minor dating back to 2008. This is smoking gun proof of tampering. Please read my full report here.
There needs to be an investigation.
Bushpilot1 proves your point with his posts to you in this thread, far better than anything you could ever say.
The Mods said the poster(Jeff Winston) was to much bs. What is bs?
1. Foolish, deceitful language.
2. Something worthless, deceptive, or insincere.
3. Insolent talk or behavior.
4. Speak foolishly or insolently.
5. Attempt to mislead or deceive by talking nonsense.
“I must conclude birthers are too stupid to read.”
Your buddy Mr. Rogers making rational arguments in the thread Butterdzillion just posted a link to:
Only an idiot would believe a case involving a womans right to vote under the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment is a binding statement of the meaning of NBC.”
“But then, someone who can read more than one sentence will not be a birther.”
“any court would laugh at you.”
“That being the case, I can certainly forgive you for having lumped all those you disagree with into the category of “Obama apologists.” :-)
I’ll do my best to refrain from personal attack and ridicule, and hope that those who share your point of view will do the same as well.”
You are right and I will try to do better in the future as well.
By the way, I would like to wish everyone - and yes, this includes you too, bushpilot1 - a happy 4th of July.
235 years have gone by since the Founding Fathers wrote a letter to King George and told him we were gone and NEVER coming back.
And TWO HUNDRED AND THIRTY-FIVE YEARS LATER, we are still here. We may be troubled, but we are still here, and we are still...
...the greatest nation on the face of the earth.
To all: a Happy 4th of July.
Trying to sign off, but must make one final comment, to add to my previous statement:
Ill do my best to refrain from personal attack and ridicule, and hope that others who share my point of view will do the same as well.
Again: a Happy 4th to you and yours. Stay safe, and have a great weekend!
You posted a thread in an attempt to discredit Attorney Leo Donofrio. The thread was pulled. The person discredited was Jeff Winston.
There are no happy 4ths as long as we have an usurper in the WH.
I just wandered by this thread a few minutes ago, and it sure appears to me like you and Jeff Winston are obot trolls. I can’t prove that, but if it walks like a duck...well you know the rest!
Her point is that the page might have been edited since 2008 to put the missing material back in. Apparently Donofrio has screen caps of the way the page looked at the time.
BTW, do you have any evidence to back up your theory that he doctored the screen shots?
Because nobody outside of the birther circus buys this manufactured definition of eligibility.
It just keeps clicking and won’t go to any page, even when I click on “Impatient?”
What Donofrio is saying is that they took out the title of the case so that those who would search for references to Minor v Happersett would not be able to see the different places where it was used as precedent in other cases. Donofrio has recently said that the two-citizen-parent definition for “natural born citizen” is established precedent, and cases that cited Minor v Happersett as precedent on questions of citizenship would support that.
What Donofrio is saying now is that back in early 2008 somebody realized that the Minor v Happersett references would prove that there is already an NBC definition established as precedent so they wanted to make it as difficult as possible for people to find out when Minor v Happersett was cited as precedent. So they had Justia take out that title so it wouldn’t show up in a search.
Just think of what entities like google could accidentally leave out of an edition...
*YOU* cannot win on the basis of facts. Here's an example from some days earlier.
----------------------------------------------------------- Jeff Winston said:
Under the power to adopt a uniform system of naturalization Congress, as early as 1790,... "and that the children of citizens of the United States that might be born beyond the sea, or out of the limits of the United States, should be considered as natural-born citizens.
If you can shoot down my reasoning, you're certainly welcome to have a go at it. I doubt that you will, since you repeatedly completely refused, about half a dozen times, to respond at all to my analysis of Wong Kim Ark. But, there it is.
------------------------------------------------------- My response: Monday, June 27, 2011 8:29:13 AM
I am very glad that you quoted the Naturalization act of 1790. That means you accept it as part of your argument, therefore you will have to accept ALL of it! It goes on further to say:
"Provided, That the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose FATHERS have never been resident in the United States:"
As you yourself point out, this act was produced a mere 3 years after the adoption of the constitution (actually just 1 year) , and the Members of Congress were pretty much the same people as the Original Delegates. This act gives a clear insight to what they were thinking regarding citizenship status of the children of Foreign Fathers.
Make note. It not only prohibits them from being "Natural born citizens" it prohibits granting them ANY citizenship at all! They are not EVEN citizens.
And what did you do? Rather than addressing the point, you ran away and whined that I was uncivil towards you. After dealing with you a few times, it's a wonder that anyone IS civil towards you.
The snapshot I posted is from 6/11/09.
You can also browse back to 2008 and view the Apr 24th snapshot, where there is a reference to the Cohens case and then look at the June 23rd snapshot, where this reference is removed. This is exactly the time frame when the reference was removed from the case Leo cites.
Nothing to see here, folks.
So? They think an Amendment to grant citizenship to slaves makes it legal to kill unborn children. What do THEY know?
The modern legal system has become nothing but a clown circus. It gets stuff wrong all the time.
I am not commenting on Leo himself, and the political or religious stance of a person doesn’t tell me whether or not their evidence or argument is valid. At this point I have no way of knowing which of the researchers and/or lawyers are genuine and which are disinformation agents throwing out false stuff just to throw a monkey wrench in the works for those who are genuine. All I can go by is the actual evidence.
Donofrio was immediately accused of forging a screenshot, and anybody who didn’t believe Donofrio had forged the screenshot was immediately accused of not using logic or being interested in evidence or practicing due diligence. That’s not cool with me. I have seen no evidence thus far that Donofrio forged that screenshot, and I HAVE found evidence that what he said the “current” page was is in a Google-cached page for June 21, 2011. The person who accused Donofrio of forging a screenshot has presented no evidence to support that claim and has not apologized for making a false accusation (based sheerly on speculation that it COULD HAVE been forged) either.
Philman 63 has said he/she can’t see the latest date that the page was revised. Somebody else said they could see it but didn’t say what the date was.
So now the story switches to trying to show that it’s not unusual that the text that was entered correctly in 2006 and altered in early 2008 to get rid of the reference was now changed back to accurate the day after Donofrio posted about the manipulation, because it isn’t the only instance where that happened.
Kleon says he’s seen a Way Back Machine page showing that it happened elsewhere. He’s even posted a direct link that is supposed to take me to that page. But my computer won’t go to it. Apparently all this “evidence” is like the mythical unicorn that only appears to true believers. lol. And that in itself is something that is so common for me that it’s ho-hum already. I’ve been dealing with not being allowed to see stuff for a long, long time. But it’s not supposed to be this way. I’ve even had people tell me I must be crazy because I simply note the “difficulties” and/or anomalies I constantly battle on my computer. Stuff like e-mails that I watch my computer receive - watch the blue bars show the progress on receiving it - but then after it’s been received it doesn’t show up anywhere in my mail folders. Or the e-mails I receive from people referring to prior e-mails they had sent but I never received.
Donofrio has pointed out what he believes is a manipulation. I have seen so many manipulations that nothing would surprise me. I have seen people reported as dead who are not dead, dates listed for published obituaries that were never published - claims which show up right at the time I was discussing those people in “secure” places online. I have seen materials pop in and out of availability on Way BAck Machine. I have seen intelius reports on people who don’t exist. I’ve seen the HDOH lie on a regular basis. I watched them hide the Administrative Rules that are required to be posted publicly at all times, and only post it as required after the Lt Gov was specifically asked if that is his responsibility to see that the agencies comply with that law. I’ve seen SCOTUS dockets disappear without explanation. I’ve seen Google pop information in and out of visibility.
I’ve also seen things I thought were manipulations that turned out to be misunderstandings.
The whole situation forces a person to have a “wait and see” approach. Which is precisely what Obama needs people to be forced to have, since people who aren’t sure of anything aren’t willing to stick their neck out for anything. It’s the ultimate post-modern existence; nobody can know anything so everybody lives in permanent limbo. While we’re all debating what the meaning of “is” is, Obama is tearing the country’s foundations limb from limb.
As I said before, that's not going to tell you anything, because the content on the right (links to facebook profiles, etc) is always being updated. No matter when you click it, it will say it was updated just minutes ago.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.