Posted on 07/01/2011 4:01:29 PM PDT by SatinDoll
The US Supreme Court Center at Justia.com is the leading resource on the internet which publishes United States Supreme Court decisions. They have been caught red handed in an Orwellian attempt to revise US Supreme Court cases which mention Minor v. Happersett as precedent on the issue of citizenship, as opposed to the other issue decided in Minor, voting rights.
I have documented two incredible examples where Justia.com has been caught in the act of taking a hatchet job to US Supreme Court decisions by removing, not just the case name, “Minor v. Happersett”, but whole passages related to Chief Justice Waite’s statements on the citizenship issue which were cited favorably in BOYD V. NEBRASKA EX REL. THAYER, 143 U. S. 135 (1892), and POPE V. WILLIAMS, 193 U. S. 621 (1904).
I have published my complete investigation into this fraud perpetrated by Justia.com – including snapshots and evidence collected from the Way Back Machine at the Internet Archive – in the comments section of my previous report, THE EXPRESS LANE TO NATURAL BORN CLARITY. My investigation was triggered by a reader’s comment regarding Boyd. The comment was on a separate issue. But I then noticed that the Boyd case, as currently published by Justia.com, made reference to Minor v. Happersett without properly naming the case.
***************************************************
This is beyond shocking. Somebody, back in 2008, just prior to the election, ordered these revisions and saw to their execution. This is direct tampering with United States law. And it is evidence that Minor v. Happersett was known to be a huge stumbling block to POTUS eligibility.
It confirms that Minor v. Happersett was seen as a dangerous US Supreme Court precedent which construed the natural-born citizen clause of Article 2 Section 1 to make only those persons born in the US to citizen parents (plural)… eligible to be President.
According to binding US Supreme Court precedent, Obama is not eligible to be President. And we are obviously very late coming to this legal truth. Somebody at Justia.com tried to control and alter our awareness by hiding important Supreme Court references to Minor dating back to 2008. This is smoking gun proof of tampering. Please read my full report here.
There needs to be an investigation.
Hey, bushpilot1, could you help out?
Go to the link given by butter above and do a screen capture of every instance of "minor" in a search. Lower case without a check in the "match case" box.
I don't do screen captures and you're a pro at it.
BTW, butter, anybody going to the link you've given can do the same search on "minor" and see the results.
A problem they’ve had since 2008, and just fixed now!
There is no substitute for shining the light of truth on an issue.
No, I don't.
I have no idea; for all I know it happens when they update their links.
What's important is that it can be observed even on cases not relating to eligibility.
Not sure why freedomwarrior998 is so passionate in his adamant rush to refute the info, to the extent of insulting members. If there’s no fruit to be borne, time will tell. I’m ordinarily no conspiracy buff, but I’m also tired of being expected to turn a blind eye to loose ends that don’t make sense, and this White House is one huge tangle of loose ends.
There’s no mention of Minor v Happersett in that page. Is that what you were seeking?
This is the notation at the top of the page:
This is Google’s cache of http://supreme.justia.com/us/143/135/case.html. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on Jun 21, 2011 08:46:58 GMT. The current page could have changed in the meantime. Learn more
~~~~
So, that’s not the current page?
Google Cached Pages
Clicking on that link takes you to the Google cached version of that web page, instead of the current version of the page.
Snip...When Google displays the cached page, a header at the top serves as a reminder that what you see isn’t necessarily the most recent version of the page.
Snip...This is useful if the original page is unavailable because of:
The owner’s recently removing the page from the Web
Yeah, only if you live in a city. It's long-since past time to get the hell out of Dodge.
Burn baby burn!
OK .. thanks.
Thank you for posting this article
I sent this to my Congressman & Senator
The 800 pound gorilla, or the pink elephant, if you prefer, in the room is of course the obvious reason for ineligibility that we all know....
A natural born US citizen is born on US soil and has 2 American citizen parents.
Barry Barack Obama Soetoro “wrote” (well, Ayers did) a whole book around his Kenyan father.
Whatever fake certificates he can fabricate, his own words condemn him as ineligible. “Dreams from my father”, a Kenyan.
Why is it that no one in the media or politics or anywhere, just says this simple truth? He’s not eligible because his father was not an American. It’s so simple.
But no, Obozo leads the nation around by the nose, taunting us with one fake BC after another, joking about having to plaster it to his forehead....etc.
When it actually doesn’t matter if he were born on the Moon. Daddy was not an American, and Barry is a usurper.
He just happens to have enough melanin to get away with all of this. It’s the soft racism of low expectations, and he used it all the way to The White House, and will punish America for the full 4 years of his miserable term.
(We'll see rather quickly which ones pull the assignment for this thread.)
You’re the man! TYVM.
If you go to the Wayback Machine via web.archive.org you can look at Justia’s archived citations of the case from before 2008. Here’s the URL for Oct. 31, 2006:
http://web.archive.org/web/20061031102938/http://supreme.justia.com/us/143/135/case.html
On that date and through Feb. 19, 2008, the citation reads, “As remarked by Mr. Chief Justice WAITE in Minor v. Happersett, 21 Wall. 162, 167:”
As of May 19, 2008 and at least through June 25, 2009, the citation reads, “As remarked by Mr. Chief Justice Waite in @ 88 U. S. 167:”
The URL to that archived record is:
http://web.archive.org/web/20080518172703/http://supreme.justia.com/us/143/135/case.html
There can’t be much question that early in 2008 someone tampered with Justia’s record of the court decision. Now Justia’s record has been changed once again (sometime after June 25, 2009), back to the original, correct case name and reference number.
The game’s afoot, Watson.
RS and others told me about screenhunter.
RS is the expert...me novice.
http://download.cnet.com/ScreenHunter-Free/3000-2192_4-10063246.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.