Posted on 07/19/2011 3:20:36 PM PDT by rxsid
"Who Is A Natural Born Citizen?
So Im on the OReilly Factor and I say if the Republicans dont put Marco Rubio on their national ticket they need to get their heads examined. Such is my regard for the freshman senator from Florida.
What followed were emails from people who told me that Rubio cant be vice president because the Constitution says only natural born citizens can be president or vice president, and he doesnt fit the description.
Some went a tad further. Ray said I need to wake up. Gregor who signed his name American by Birth Patriot by Choice said my comment about Rubio was both uneducated and foolish. Edward said, Im sure you have read the Constitution but I urge you to reread Article I, Section II which gives the qualifications for president. David simply stated that, Neither of Marco Rubios parents were citizens of our country when he was born. Therefore, Marco Rubio is not a Natural Born Citizen of the United States.
Im always amused when I get letters from self-appointed scholars who have no doubt none! about how knowledgeable they are when it comes to constitutional law even though not one of them spent even 10 minutes in law school. How do I know? If they had, trust me, they would have mentioned it IN CAPITAL LETTERS!
Many of these people, I suspect, have another agenda, which Ill get to shortly. But first
The Constitution does not define the term natural born citizen. And as Wikipedia explains, scholars and politicians have not agreed as to whether U.S.-born children of non-citizens qualify as natural born citizens.
Also from Wikipedia: The natural born citizen clause has been mentioned in passing in several decisions of the United States Supreme Court and lower courts, but the Supreme Court has never directly addressed the question of a specific presidential or vice-presidential candidates eligibility as a natural born citizen.
So what did the Founders have in mind when they used that term they didnt bother to define? Well, after the Constitution was ratified, some of the Founders opined about the meaning of the clause. Heres what James Madison, one of the authors of the Constitution, had to say on the subject in a speech before the House of Representatives in May 1789: MORE HERE
From the Comment Section:
Ron Kean --- I have Natural Born Citizen Fatigue.
Bernard Goldberg --- me too, Ron. http://www.bernardgoldberg.com/who-is-a-natural-born-citizen/#comments "
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/07/bernard-goldberg-i-have-natural-born.html
Office | Citizenship |
|
Age | Residency (or years citizen) |
President & Commander in Chief (1 of 1) | natural born Citizen |
|
35 | 14 years resident |
Senator (1 of many) | Citizen |
|
30 | 9 years a Citizen |
Represantative (1 of many) | Citizen |
|
25 | 7 years a Citizen |
Assuming Barry's father really was Obama Sr., Barry was born a subject to the crown of her majesty the Queen of England, inheriting his foreign father's foreign citizenship by birthright.
Then, when Kenyan gained it's independence, Barry obtained Kenyan citizenship at age ~2.
He possibly even had Indonesian citizenship if his step father Lolo Soetoro adopted him.
Forget dual citizen...Barry was/is a multi-national. He never was a "natural born Citizen."
Question is, do enough people care in the present day that Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution is currently being completely ignored? Where are all the "Constitutionalists?"
"Bernard Goldberg: I Have Natural Born Citizen Fatigue"
Poor Bernie. Guess what, many have usurper fatigue!
I have the fatigue too. Does anyone thing Levin or Coulter would not have brought it up if so? Those are my 2 favorite constitutional lawyers.
Not only that it is one track mind, all you ever hear out of WND. Corsi will never recover. Talk about picking your battles really badly.
Neither did any of our nation's Founders.
Yo Bernie, does this answer your question?
Is this a Natural Born Citizen?
The mere notion, in 1787 American, would have been absurd.
I believe they gave up on the actual Constitutional issue because the issue was (somewhat) successfully Alinskied and turned into the B.C. "birther" issue.
I say somewhat because not everyone was convinced the history doesn't matter and that there really is more to the issue than the bogus b.c.
You can bet the leftists will saddle right up on the issue to (a) label constitutionalists as racist, xenophobic bigots, and (b) keep constitutionalists from voting for Rubio if he is nominated for prez or VP. It’s a win-win for them.
Ann Coulter’s career would be hurt if she talked about this. She wouldn’t be able to make all the speaking engagements she makes, and she wouldn’t be able to guest on Fox if she spoke about this. Ann isn’t conservative on a lot of things.
The drafters did define natural born citizenship as a child born to parents who were citizens. It’s pathetic that the people on Fox are so fake.
The drafters did define natural born citizenship as a child born to parents who were citizens. It’s pathetic that the people on Fox are so fake.
“The drafters did define natural born citizenship as a child born to parents who were citizens.”
So I’m a NBC? Even though I was born in Israel to two Israeli citizens who happened to also be USA citizens? (I do, indeed, have a USA Passport and can even vote.)
How about Bibi Netanyahu? I think his parents were Americans, too, at one point. Even grew up in Pittsburg.
Seriously, the best definition I have seen is “a natural born citizen is a person who is a citizen of the USA at birth.”
Sen. Rubio’s parents, while not citizens, were legal immigrants at the time of his birth in Florida.
The child had to be born in America or on an American territory.
Aristotle would call Obama a “half-alien”.
That’s just not there.
The NBC rule was to prevent a Johnny-come-lately from swooping in from Europe, becoming a citizen, and then president on a tide of goodwill or threat of conquest -— as kings did in Europe.
Someone born here that was American since he drew breath -— NBC.
Indeed, and that would be 100% accurate.
There was no definition for a citizen who was natural born available to the framers, founders or the colonist's that would back that up.
There was, however a definition available that described citizens who were natural born as being born in the country to citizen parents.
Of course there was. There was Blackstone's definition of the natural born subject. It wasn't difficult to apply that when we were no longer subjects but citizens.
Certainly Vattel's concept of "les Naturels ou indigènes" was further outside our traditions at the time and would have been more of a stretch than Blackstone's thinking.
In any event, if Obama's father was already married his marriage to Stanley Ann Dunham would have been null and void and his citizenship would have been moot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.