Governor Palin’s Tea Party Speech Will Take Place on the Three-Year Anniversary of Her RNC Conven...

Conservatives4palin ^ | Wednesday July 27, 2011 | Ian Lazaran

[Bigtigermike]

Whitney was the first person to notice that the Tea Party keynote address she is scheduled to give in Waukee, Iowa falls on the third the three-year anniversary of her speech at the 2008 Republican National Convention (September 3rd).

The Governor seemed to provide a Preview of her speech in a press release from the Tea Party group:

I’m very excited to join grassroots Iowans at the ‘Restoring America’ event over Labor Day Weekend…Gatherings like this of independent liberty-loving Americans from every walk of life exemplify our commitment to come together to seek solutions to the problems confronting our nation. As I’ve said many times, including at Pella during my last visit to Iowa: We don’t need a ‘fundamental transformation’ of America. We need a restoration of all that is good and strong and free. The 2012 election will be a great debate between those two conflicting visions for our country.

[FreeReign]

I'll also add where's Santorum's apology for endorsing Spector?

LOL!

[nopardons]

Thanks for pointing out that poster's constant evasions.

I was too busy posting facts, trying to get that poster to face his/her projection complex, and counter his lies, to take that point on as well.

Sadly, some people are without shame, so they don't ever feel embarrassed.

[nopardons]

Just a word of advice..........

Stop with the "worshipers" garbage.

Stop with the religious pokes in the eye, that are beginning to make you look like some kind of a strange "THE WORLD IS COMING TO THE END" wandering kook.

Please stop the ad hominems, when YOU are the one using them constantly and then playing the "victim card".

And last, but not least.........please, please, PLEASE don't use made up words, for the real ones, especially when you are misusing that word! You have absolutely no, nada, bupkis political acumen, whatsoever and there is no such word as "acument" ! Oh and please don't say that that was a typo, because obviously you tried to spell the word the way you say it, which proves that you mispronounce the word when saying it.

[freedumb2003]

>>Par for the course for this whiny debator<<

Of course, when all you have is “the bad man said something I don’t like” it is no surprise you fall back to childish ad hominem.

And, as usual, you and your ilk can’t point to a single post where I have said anything against Gov. Palin. You just use a generic “but you were MEAN TO US! You PREDICTED something we don’t PREDICT THE SAME WAY!” And sometimes you even yelled to JR “DADDY! THE BAD MAN IS SAYING THINGS WE DON’T LIKE!! He is PREDICTING things OUR RELIGION DOES NOT ALLOW!!!!”

I am not saying all Palin supporters are cultists, but when someone suggests a factual possible outcome, such as she may not run, and gets personally attacked — yep, we are dealing with cultists.

[Lazlo in PA]

As I said, McCain is of course NOT honorable. So where's Bachmann's apology now for calling McCain "honorable" and for refusing to endorse Heyworth over McCain??

Well my argument is that Palin endorsed this loser very publicly. She should now tell us what she thinks of this. Apparently from your second reply, you believe that calling someone Honorable is the same as an endorsement. Otherwise, what is your point? She said a lie about his true character? She refused to endorse? A non endorsement is business as usual? None of these make any sense as an argumant against my statement.

It appears to me that you are in an all out race to somehow hit one of the candidates running that I like just to prove a point. It failed miserably.

[Windflier]

I have been kind twice in this thread. I shan’t be kind a third time. this is the last post you shall get from me, ever.

Uh-oh. I done gone and did it now. Freedumb is taking his mitt and going home. Crap.

And you even used the word "shan't" on me. I feel....so.....harshed.

All kidding aside, I've tried to treat you like an adult, but you don't respond to that. Respect is earned, freedumb. So is disrespect.

[nopardons]

No, the use of the word "dude" is childish slang, used by supposed adults still stuck in their preadolescent days, when they would rather use a nasty word, because they have had their twee feelings hurt.

No, it isn't the "right thing to do"; it is what YOU would do and want Palin to do FOR you.

Palin just might say something about the lastest stupid remark McLame has sputtered, but she has much bigger fish to fry................OBAMA!

Go look up that old thread, re Santorum..........I can guarantee that I wasn't there railing against you!

What would be far better than what YOU want, is for Palin to thoroughly ignore McLame from here on out and well into the future.

[GrandJediMasterYoda]

I really hope she runs and wins, not only because I think she is the best candidate going but also because it would annoy the absolute living hell out of the liberal elites. We think Bush annoyed them? Palin would actually have them leave the country LOL which right there would improve this country 1000%

[wardaddy]

It’s time to get in and be heard as a candidate

Boenher could use some help with RINOs caving left and right and the Tea Party gnawing on his leg

These are heavy days...it would be nice to see someone with her weight....

weigh in as a candidate

[Lazlo in PA]

He gave it numerous times.

Here’s one.

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2010/04/10/santorum-apologizes-for-04-specter-endorsement/

[Windflier]

...this freedumb2003 is one poster I am going to enjoy rubbing the salt into the wound once Sarah declares.

He's one stand-out act on Free Republic. He's worked really hard to earn his PDSer reputation, and boy does he have one now. But he's got company, and you can bet they're all going to see their words emblazoned across endless threads after Palin declares.

Their responses are going to be entertaining, I'll bet. That is, if they don't all hide out for a few months to avoid having to face the humiliation.

[Windflier]

It’s time to get in and be heard as a candidate

Patience, grasshopper. I'm also anxious as hell for her to declare, but she's employing a very intelligent strategy that can't be hurried, if it's to succeed. Patience.

[wardaddy]

I'll be manning the phones and partying down at the local Palin campaign office,

Do you know where any actually are...usually at this stage some early shock troops are out front in big markets and key states...even if unannounced...I wonder about that

Reagan had his in place from 76 primary run....those in 2008 where as much Queeg's as her's and unfortunately as we now know many hated her

I would love to hear she has something cooking out there as far as movement towards offices etc ...all I see is hard talk here.

I know for a fact that as of two weeks ago she was not ogranizing here in TN yet....now she may figure she doesn't need to here?

I think the serious south is in her purse if she wants it...the white vote...soft states like VA, NC and FL...who knows

this is major kill for Perry...we own Texas..he brings nothing electorally by being from TX

if she is gonna run...she better start by labor day

man...if she does not run...it will be a wild ride between Mitt, Michelle and Perry...only one of them does anything for me

[FreeReign]

Well my argument is that Palin endorsed this loser very publicly. She should now tell us what she thinks of this. Apparently from your second reply, you believe that calling someone Honorable is the same as an endorsement.

Unbelievable.

For the second time now, I didn't say that calling somebody honorable is the same thing as endorsing them.

What I did say is that Bachmann calling McCain honorable is wrong, and that Bachmann NOT endorsing Heyworth is wrong.

You would actually disagree with those two points??

[Lazlo in PA]

No, the use of the word "dude" is childish slang, used by supposed adults still stuck in their preadolescent days, when they would rather use a nasty word, because they have had their twee feelings hurt.

That's your opinion. I use the term the way I want. What are you, a psychoanalyst.

No, it isn't the "right thing to do"; it is what YOU would do and want Palin to do FOR you.

So I am not to question Palin at all? She is so much wiser than peons like ME? Since when did Palin became the all mighty of politics. If I am not mistaken, there was a little movie just released to fix the damage to a huge political missteps that Palin herself realized. The producer of the film said on Hannity that it was made to fully explain the resignation from Gov. Bannon said she knew it was a big issue with the public. I have every right to question what politicians and political pundits do. I think this is a fair question about this endorsement.

What would be far better than what YOU want, is for Palin to thoroughly ignore McLame from here on out and well into the future.

That is all supposition. We have no idea. It looks like she is going to play it your way. We will see what happens.

[Lazlo in PA]

You would actually disagree with those two points??

Absolutely. A non endorsement is irrelevant. So she was polite about not endorsing. She still didn't endorse.

[nopardons]

What I am is an adult who understands the English language and knows that those who use old slang, instead of perfectly good English words, have holes in their education as well in their knowledge of vocabulary and communication ability.

Yes, you can use, misuse, and completely revert to a time gone by, by using long dead slang; that is your prerogative. OTOH, it also puts you in a bad light/situation; one which allows others to not take you all that seriously and view you as someone just not all that intelligent. I doubt that this is something you crave, but it's what you've managed to do to yourself.

You haven't "questioned" Palin at all; not one whit. You have demanded that she do something that YOU can't do, to any effect. You want her to "fight" for you, publicly, no matter what the cost is to her. It would make you feel all warm inside, before you found something else you wanted her to do for you.

"Since when did Palin became (SIC) the almighty of politics." ( where is the question mark at the end of a questioning sentence ? )

Hmmmmmmmm..........lets see, Palin's endorsements have helped a vast number of pols to get elected in '10. Her facebook comments and tweets have stirred politics as no other has, from her "death panel" comments through all the rest of them. Name me one other person, in or out of elected office who has done that in the past 3 years!

The movie, THE UNDEFEATED, was NOT made nor promoted as something to "fix" her resigning her office as governor! In point of fact, it was made by Bannon, without any input from Palin or anyone in her family, to show what was done to her and what her record REALLY is !

I didn't post a supposition as to what she will/is doing, re McQueeg! No, what I posted is what I think she SHOULD do, as opposed to your politically naive, immature cravings as to what YOU yearn/demand of her. There's a big difference between a "supposition" and what I posted.

Go work on your vocabulary, learn some logic, and at least try to learn some facts about the topic that you are so wedded to talking/posting about.......Sarah Palin. Elsewise, everyone reading your posts will know, full well, just how little you know and/or understand about anything, as well as how badly you write English prose.

[Lazlo in PA]

Are you an 19th century School Marm? Reading your overblown posts on my form make me think that this is who I am talking to.

You are aware that this is a political forum and not a High School Honors English class?

The movie, THE UNDEFEATED, was NOT made nor promoted as something to "fix" her resigning her office as governor! In point of fact, it was made by Bannon, without any input from Palin or anyone in her family, to show what was done to her and what her record REALLY is !

Bannon said in an interview with Hanitty that before getting started with making the movie, he talked to Palin about the issue of the Gov resignation and that it was an issue to her. I can't find it now so feel free to slap me with your yard stick.

[3722535r]

“She doesn’t need John McCain and ignoring his sporadic anti-conservative tirades is the best way to diminish him.”

Agreed....

[3722535r]

“McCain should never have thrown his hat into the ring!...... He is completely unprepared for this run, has made more than a few huge gaffs, and today was the worst one!.... He can’t even talk the talk and just proved that he has no “principles” that he won’t flip flop on.”

Many times I think of how difficult it must have been for Gov. Palin to stump for him on the 2008 campaign....I think she knew it was the correct political move as far as her future was concerned though....