Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Perry's HPV vaccine stance really outrageous?
Bluegrass Pundit ^ | September 17, 2011 | Bluegrass Pundit

Posted on 09/17/2011 7:29:48 AM PDT by Askwhy5times

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-192 next last
To: icanhasbailout

“There is not a single vaccine today that we could not live without, without having millions die off. “

Wrong. Go take a walk through any of the old cemeraries in your state and look at the number of young children buried there. 50% mortality rate was very common among the young into recent times. Ben Franklin, IIRC, was one of the supporters of introducing mandatory vaccination for smallpox. Last I looked, he was considered one of the Founding Fathers. Not to mention tetanus, diptheria, measles, polio, and many other diseases that are still with us. Eliminate the vaccines, and see the children die.

Old Student


121 posted on 09/17/2011 12:58:22 PM PDT by Old Student (Do NOT make me get out the torches and pitchforks...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
I just went back and reviewed the entire line of posts to see the origin, etc., in case I really did misread you.

We are on the same page RE Bachmann. My reading comprehension is just fine. You emotionally and hot-headedly slammed Bachmann supporters for being emotional and hot-headed. You did it by accusing them of being absurd by leveling absurd things against them! {^) Very effective communication technique (NOT! Like Rush warns, Don't Try This at Home). I remain convinced that at the bottom, you're capable of being as irrational and hot-headed in your attacks on Bachmann supporters as you say the Bachmann supporters are in defense of Bachmann.

Just an observation, that's all. I did my due diligence and am relieved to see that indeed, my reading comprehension is just fine. :^)

122 posted on 09/17/2011 1:07:22 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: icanhasbailout

“Here you go, complete with video:”

Well, if you believe that “an econonomic recovery plan” means TARP, and only TARP, I guess I can see why you think he lied, but I’m thinking you’re missing the boat there. I could see extending the Bush tax cuts as “an economic recovery plan, as well.

I do thank you for the link, though. At least now I know why you say what you say. I’m not yet Pro-Perry, but I’m not Anti-Perry, either. So far, the only “dog” I have in this fight is Mitt Romney, and I’m not at all fond of him. Far too eastern Liberal for my tastes, despite a shared religion.

Gracia, Amigo!


123 posted on 09/17/2011 1:10:43 PM PDT by Old Student (Do NOT make me get out the torches and pitchforks...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

“I can find nothing that shows that Hep-B vaccine is required by the state of Alaska for infants and toddlers.”

I think if you’ll check the (drawing a blank on proper name/acronym, but the organization of pediatric doctors) that they’ve recommended Hep-B shots for all children prior to going to school, and that the recommendation has been adopted by nearly every state in the Union. I know it’s in place here in Oklahoma.

OS


124 posted on 09/17/2011 1:14:41 PM PDT by Old Student (Do NOT make me get out the torches and pitchforks...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Old Student
Well, if you believe that “an econonomic recovery plan” means TARP, and only TARP, I guess I can see why you think he lied, but I’m thinking you’re missing the boat there. I could see extending the Bush tax cuts as “an economic recovery plan, as well.

The timing clears up any confusion. The letter was written while TARP was under consideration and in the heat of the debate. It could not have been reasonably interpreted by anyone reading it to be referring to any other proposal.

125 posted on 09/17/2011 1:16:42 PM PDT by icanhasbailout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Old Student

Smallpox was an imminent public health threat. HPV which may (or may not) lead to cancer in some individuals 40+ years later is not.


126 posted on 09/17/2011 1:18:49 PM PDT by icanhasbailout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Finny

he he — I tried it way more than just at home. You’d be surprised - VERY surprised.....


127 posted on 09/17/2011 1:23:25 PM PDT by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Finny

“Certainly some could — and do — see it that way as Perry was very clear when he was reelected Governor that he had no intention of running for President.”

the OP had a different reason, which I’ve replied to seperately, and I can see his reasoning, though I disagree with him, at least modestly. As for saying he had no intention THEN, doesn’t necessarily invalidate his decision to run NOW. It may say things about his ego, or his sense of duty, or something else entirely, but not necessarily his veracity.

I, too, like Palin better, but she hasn’t declared, yet. I’ve read that she intends to wait for 2016, but I don’t think that was sourced adequately, either.

I think it only fair to admit that a part of my preference for Sarah is simply to see the number of liberal head explosions that would result. Childish, I know. ;) I still want a PALIN*McWhatsisname bumper sticker...


128 posted on 09/17/2011 1:37:30 PM PDT by Old Student (Do NOT make me get out the torches and pitchforks...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: icanhasbailout

“Smallpox was an imminent public health threat. HPV which may (or may not) lead to cancer in some individuals 40+ years later is not.”

You and I will disagree on this, I guess. Perhaps you don’t know that there is no set time for the cervical cancer to develop. My MIL was only (strike the 29, it was 25) when she developed it, and had been married only a few years. They were on their honeymoon when Pres. Kennedy was assasinated. Lots less than 40+ years, at any rate. My wife says they lost a baby before she was born, and she was born in ‘65. Her younger brother is only a year or so younger than she is, so 66 or 67, probably, and no children after that, as she had the cervix and such surgically removed.

OS


129 posted on 09/17/2011 1:44:39 PM PDT by Old Student (Do NOT make me get out the torches and pitchforks...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: icanhasbailout

If voluntary, insurance won’t pay for it.


130 posted on 09/17/2011 1:55:21 PM PDT by DRey (Perry/Rubio 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Old Student
That's not very relevant unless you are asserting she got cervical cancer due to HPV.
131 posted on 09/17/2011 1:58:49 PM PDT by icanhasbailout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: icanhasbailout

http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/HPV

Q3: What is the association between HPV infection and cancer?

A: Persistent HPV infections are now recognized as the cause of essentially all cervical cancers.


132 posted on 09/17/2011 2:03:31 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Askwhy5times

It doesn’t cover the full spectrum of HPV variations so using the term “full protection” is inaccurate. I think, in terms of last minute decisions, my 10-16 year old girls are safe because they won’t be coming out of their cocoons till their 16. I’m not against this vaccination, in principle, I’m against the mis-information that is out there about it. So when someone says you are mis-informed I don’t “ask why 5 times :)” I go to scientific (albeit, very biased) sources. I’m just saying.


133 posted on 09/17/2011 2:16:32 PM PDT by Til I am the last man standing (It's the internet Senators; We can see what you are doing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Askwhy5times

It doesn’t cover the full spectrum of HPV variations so using the term “full protection” is inaccurate. I think, in terms of last minute decisions, my 10-16 year old girls are safe because they won’t be coming out of their cocoons till their 16. I’m not against this vaccination, in principle, I’m against the mis-information that is out there about it. So when someone says you are mis-informed I don’t “ask why 5 times :)” I go to scientific (albeit, very biased) sources. I’m just saying.


134 posted on 09/17/2011 2:17:05 PM PDT by Til I am the last man standing (It's the internet Senators; We can see what you are doing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Askwhy5times

How many more things will the government mandate for “our own good”?

This is a decision for the parents, not the state. Period.


135 posted on 09/17/2011 2:20:14 PM PDT by Politicalmom (Voting for Romney is surrendering to the Soviet Union rather than to the Nazis.”-FReeper Dead Corps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
-- yes he tried to make it easier. He required that the form be accepted by the internet. Today we have to get in notarized and file it with the local school administration. --

The current procedure, the one that Perry ordered implemented, is the parent files an application for an affidavit, and this filing can be done online. The state issues the official affidavit for opt-out, and this paper is provided to the schools. The same opt-our procedure applies to all vaccines. No childhood vaccine is mandatory in Texas. If the HPV vaccine was on the schedule of childhood vaccinations, it would under the same procedure as all the others.

136 posted on 09/17/2011 2:20:43 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

I agree. We have enough mandates from the government.


137 posted on 09/17/2011 2:27:34 PM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: DRey
-- If voluntary, insurance won't pay for it. --

I believe this is an "it depends" finding. The only state where HPV vaccine is mandatory is Virginia (plus Washington, DC), and some insurance plans, in states other than Virginia (and DC), cover HPV vaccines.

www.gardasil.com/what-is-gardasil/hpv-and-gardasil/coverage-for-gardasil/

While many private health plans are providing coverage for GARDASIL, the availability of coverage and the level of coverage can vary. Your coverage can even change over time. Because your doctor or health care professional has many patients with different health insurance benefits, he or she may not know the specifics regarding your coverage for GARDASIL. Before you visit the doctor's office, you may want to call your health plan to find out more about what coverage is available to you.
Also, as far as I know, ALL states provide free vaccines for qualified people, such as uninsured and poverty.
138 posted on 09/17/2011 2:28:15 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Because of our stupid federal insurance rules, insurance is different in every state. In Texas, insurance does not pay for vaccines without being mandated to do so. If you want the vaccine today, it is out-of-pocket $360.


139 posted on 09/17/2011 2:33:33 PM PDT by DRey (Perry/Rubio 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: icanhasbailout; thackney

“That’s not very relevant unless you are asserting she got cervical cancer due to HPV.”

See Thackney’s post answering your statement/question.

Thackney, thank you for your help here.


140 posted on 09/17/2011 2:34:10 PM PDT by Old Student (Do NOT make me get out the torches and pitchforks...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-192 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson