Posted on 09/21/2011 11:33:07 AM PDT by parksstp
That would work for me. This district is, at its heart, fairly conservative (at least by NY standards), and deserves after the past few decades to be represented by someone who is ‘one of them.’
” I REALLY HATE the phrase “110 percent.” THERE IS NO SUCH NUMBER.”
If the speed limit is 100 MPH, and you are driving 110 MPH, you are going 110 percent of the speed limit. So, I guess there is such a number.
The shuttle throttled up to over one hundred percent, also.
Sorry.
Uuuuhhh, Princess, if you are female, you might not understand the basic appeal of living in that ole White House with such an intelligent wife...no, I would say that a lot of us would only be too happy to perform that patriotic “duty” on a daily basis, to save the Republic from our present travesty, don’tcha know?
She’s not sitting there about to decide not to run because she doesn’t think she can win. That’s so far from reality and she doesn’t strike me as someone who sits there fretting in a corner far from reality.
As I posted on another thread.
Why is SarahPac almost begging in this letter for a one time big donation? IMO if she announces yes, they fear the pac money will dry up and go to her campaign? Or, if she announces no, the pac money will dry up from disappointed supporters?
Either way, if my prognosis is correct, I extrapolate out from it she has made her decision and will very shortly say yea or nay.
At least one publication today said Palin is filing for divorce...actually husband Todd is. She’s toast.
Wow.... Didn’t know Freepers could be this removed from reality, or at best naive.
The “publication” that decided to recycle the stale, old, proven-to-be-false rumor of Palins’ divorce was the Daily Mail (UK). Some crack reporting on the other side of the pond...investigative journalism Brit-style... you think? Well, the “industrious” reporterette wore out her shoe leather by quoting the National Enquirer story which based itself on the steaming pile of scurrilous crap put out in McGinnis’ book. You know the latter had to be horrifically inaccurate and embarrassing if even the NY Times (which salivates at the chance of driving daggers into Palin) panned the “effort” of this voyeuristic creep. All of the material McGinnis defecated into his “book” is unsubstantiated, allegations from unnamed sources, with nary a footnote. And, since this steaming pile is the “foundation” upon which the Enquirer story rose and the Enquirer piece fed this Peabody award winner (/s) @ the Daily Mail, the whole endeavor is just a pile of **it!
Either you detest Palin or are simply not paying attention.
if you are stupid enough to believe that
FYI the Iowa caucuses will always be the first. Doesn’t matter who tries to jump ahead of them. Iowa will automatically move earlier. State law.
I'll have you know that when I fully commit to something, I usually just give 107.5%. That's because I want to hold that other 2.5% in reserve for when I really need it.
During the 2010 mid-terms, the GOP cleaned up in NH. The mood hasn't changed much since then (I live on the MA/NH border). I don't think it would be difficult for the GOP presidential candidate to pick up the state in 2012.
So what if another state passes a law saying it's first?
As soon as Iowa jumps ahead, the other state does too.
In case you weren't aware, states can't pass laws over other states.
I think Todd is better then that.
So what if another state passes a law saying it’s first?
As soon as Iowa jumps ahead, the other state does too.
In case you weren’t aware, states can’t pass laws over other states.
Yeah, and that story about Todd having an affair turned out so true, didn’t it??
ROFL
No. You’re talking about comparing TWO numbers.
Why, pray tell, do you care so much? If your candidate has it "in the bag", what could Palin do to upset your applecart? Hmmmm. ;)
We’ve had no problem here at Freerepublic believing Daily Mail and National Enquirer and others when Democrats were in trouble..right?
I think a lot of what has been reported is garbage, the problem is that many people, including a number of independents will believe it. She’s toast. I suspect she does not run at all because of it. If she runs, the media will just keep digging harder and harder and that will dominate her campaign. I still think it’s Romney’s to lose, regardless of where Perry is in the polls today. His SS comments will ultimately sink him.
Because the longer she drags this thing out the more fun it is to watch. And obvious clues like this
SarahPAC letter today: "There's No Question That We Must Replace Obama in 2012"
just make it more-so.
Mr. K, it doesn’t matter if I’m stupid enough to believe it....there will be millions of voters who will, including many independents. She’s toast unless they can categorically prove it’s not true, which they won’t be able to.
People will believe anything...look at the number of nutjob Democrats that believe Bush was responsible for 9-11 and knew the planes flew into the towers. One could argue there are plenty of nutjobs on our side with the birther movement.
At the end of the day, if enough people believe those stories she’s toast. I’d argue she’s toast regardless. She has too many negatives. That’s just the reality of getting elected in this day and age.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.