Skip to comments.Defeating the West Via the Womb - the Islamic Invasion (Scary Video)
Posted on 09/24/2011 12:47:56 PM PDT by OneVike
While the citizens of Western civilizations have been preoccupied with their own selfish interests, those of the Islamic world have been busy populating a world their children and grandchildren will control. In America, Canada, and Europe, the citizens have been limiting the number of children in their families. Personally, I believe the reasons they chose to limit the number of their offspring are purely selfish.
Women want to have a career, and that is difficult to do if they are having children every 2 or 3 years. As for the men, they have bought into the idea that they will never be able to make enough money to support more than 1 or 2 children. Then there is the desire to put off having a family until they have made it, but in a world where everyone is trying to keep up with each other, no one really ever makes it. Regardless the excuses given, this behavior has led to the citizens of the West reproducing at a rate of about 1.8 per family, which is not even close to the reproduction rate of immigrants.
I could also go on and on as to the methods women in the West use to limit the number of their children, but this post is not about the methods of birth control used to achieve their goal. No, as you will learn from the video below, this column is about the devastating consequences we must now face because of their decisions.
The result of such selfish decisions by Western civilizations as a whole, is the capitulation of their children's freedom to control their own lives in the future. While the citizens of the West are preoccupied with living a life that is free of anyone's control, even God's, they are condemning their descendants to a life of bondage at the hands of a religion that.....
(Excerpt) Read more at theabrahamfactor ...
This is so true, and outbreeding the perceived enemy is not an original idea. In the 1600’s when France was colonizing in Canada, women were urged to have large families, and female orphans in France were sent to Canada to marry and produce children (”daughters of the King”...he provided these girls with a dowry). When the British were beginning to wrest control of Canada from the French in the 1700’s, the women of French descent, were urged again to have even larger families, it was called “revenge of the cradle”. I know researching my husband’s family tree (the Catholic church in Canada kept wonderful records) he has ancestors who had 20-22 children with wife no. l, and when that poor, worn out woman passed on to her rewards, proceeded to do the same with wife no. 2.
save for later.
I remember reading once many years ago that some scientists claimed some day there would be no men, only women, and all reproduction would be artificial. At the time I said to myself “what a disaster if true”.
Well, now I think maybe the sooner the better. if every woman is only having 1 or 2 children, there is no way to sustain a population...UNLESS 100% of the population is women. Then it is sustainable. Maybe the west needs more female babies.
"We have all heard about the demographic decline of Western Europe. but guess what? In the Muslim world the birth dirth is even larger. The Muslim world is on the brink of the fastest population decline in recorded history, he writes. In both Turkey and Iran, leaders are in a panic in an effort to try to get more women to have children."Follow the thread over at GatesofVienna.blogspot.com with the header "Lampedusa" and discover the flight of north African populations anticipating food shortages, at great risk of drowning at sea in the process. With the West slowly becoming aware of the dangers of Islam, it appears it would be financially and socially and morally sound to re-patriate the unwanted and unneeded muslim colonists. Win/win.
This is so true, and outbreeding the perceived enemy is not an original idea. In the 1600s when France was colonizing in Canada, women were urged to have large families, and female orphans in France were sent to Canada to marry and produce children (daughters of the King...he provided these girls with a dowry).Not to mention the practice the crown had of doing the same in Ireland and Scotland as portrayed in Braveheart. The English soldiers had the right to be the first in bed with the new brides whenever the locals got married. They wanted the womens first born to be sired by an Englishman instead of her Scottish, or Irish bride.
It would happen only if they collected enough semen from the men before they all died out. Otherwise the women would die out also.
Very depressing news.
I thought Hispanics were the largest growing minority in America.
At least they’re Christian. Maybe President Rubio, one day, can get them all on our side.
This is how we are blessed by abortion.
I don’t think so.
First of all, collecting enough extra X chromosomes should be easy. one ejaculation contains enough sperm for billions. But that is assuming each Xchromo sperm is only used once. they can be used infinitely via cloning. sans cloning, a thousand ejaculations should provide trillions of distinct x chromosomes.
limiting the gene pool to one trillion sperm times one billion western women should be enough genetic variation for well over a million generations, assuming no influx of unrelated genes. we are talking plenty of time to colonize the galaxy with human westernized females.
this is where we use carl sagan’s voice and say...”billions and billions!”
you neglect to mention the growing christianity in the far east...and the already strong christianity in south america.
when islam takes over europe...it could very well be that islam will be isolated to the middle east, north africa, europe, and indonesia...while the rest of the world is christianized. That would be a situation with islam at a disadvantage. a severe disadvantage.
now, we need to make distinction between christianity and western thought. they are not the same. we like to link the two for current events but that is a convienience not a fact. chrisitanity is literally an offshoot of middleeastern judeaism. european christianity is a mixture of paganism, christianity, and greco-roman democracy with a strong influence of english law. American style christianity adds a few more things.
First let me say that I am honored and humbled that you would honor me by posting a quote from me in the Freeper Hall of Fame section of your homepage.
Now, as for the sperm cells, I do understand your idea in theory, but in reality it will never happen.
basically, when it comes time for the whole world to willingly limit one gander, it will be the female that suffers as in China. That’s because a male will always have an easier time financially caring for the parents in their old age.
As much as the feminist movement wants us all to believe that women are just as capable of doing the things men do, reality is they are not.
Probably the biggest reason is not the physical, or mental, but the physiological reason. Men have been able to compartmentalize and survive from the beginning of time, women cannot do so.
I generalize, but we are talking about the human society as a whole, and thus the gender of women vs men as a whole.
i don’t see this as being about the feminist movement. I don’t know why you bring this up.
we have had a falling out in the past. I greatly respect SOME of your posts and comments. some of them I do not. I still love the one that I have on my homepage and I think it will be years before i see another as worthy as yours for my hall of fame.
Men are extremely variable. Some men are not good at hands on things. some men are not good at killing and war. Some men are not good at fixing things. Some men are not good at manual labor.
I have experience as a manual laborer, a crew boss, an administrator, a supervisor, mechanic, electrician, plumber, driver, engineer, fixit man, etc. I will tell you that there is a huge overlap with women when it comes to basic skills. men have an advantage mostly when it come to hard physical labor but only when those men are between 20 and 40 and only about 50% of men have this advantage. But more importantly, only maybe 15% of all jobs is this advantage relevant. 85% of all jobs...this advantage is moot...and dwindling in the current modern reality.
therefore i think an all female population(or a severely skewed ratio) is not non-workable
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.