Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tables Turned on White House Press Corps
October 3, 2011 | Linda Jordan

Posted on 10/03/2011 11:21:55 AM PDT by ethical

Tables Turned on White House Press Corps October 3, 2011 Press Release

I have two questions, not for the President, but for the White House Press Corps.

1. Why is Barack Obama using a Social Security Number , issued out of Connecticut in 1977, when he was 15 years old and living in Hawaii? Keep in mind that if you are over 12 years old you have to apply for your SSN in person.

2. The President held a press conference on April 27th, 2011. He announced that he had requested a waiver from the Hawaii Department of Health (DOH), in order to obtain a photo copy of his original, long-form, Certificate of Live Birth instead of the computer generated Certification of Live Birth per Hawaii DOH policy.

He gave the press a letter from his lawyer Judith Corley requesting the waiver and a letter from Hawaii DOH Director Loretta Fuddy granting the waiver. This waiver allowed the President to get a photo copy of his original birth certificate.

But he did not post a photo copy on the White House website he posted a computer generated document. You don’t need a waiver from the Hawaii DOH to get a computer generated birth record and scanning a photo copy in to a computer does not turn it in to a computer generated document. So where is the photo copy of the President’s Certificate of Live Birth and why did he lie about posting it?

Press Challenge: Forget about whether or not the President will answer these questions. Can YOU answer them?

Press Contact: Linda Jordan


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: birth; democrats; fraud; jokerreporters; liberalmedia; mediabias; noaccountability; nohonesty; nointegrity; notruth; noveritas; obama; obamedia; reportersasjokes; reportersonknees; ssn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: Buckeye McFrog

It’s sad, isn’t it ? No one trusts anyone any more.

I love to tell the story of my best friend and I, ages 11 and 9, respectively, being allowed by our parents to ride the NYC subway alone from Queens to Manhattan for a day at the “Y.” hahaahha can you even IMAGINE that today???

Not only were we safe, but when she got on the train and I was left crying on the platform, adults came along to comfort me, and told me she’d be waiting for me at the next stop .. which she was! And we did it all without cells.


21 posted on 10/03/2011 12:39:18 PM PDT by EDINVA ( Jimmy McMillan '12: because RENT'S, TOO DAMN HIGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ethical

Shhh, don’t go around asking such questions or you’ll be on the Attack Watch list!!!


22 posted on 10/03/2011 12:42:10 PM PDT by bgill (There, happy now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ethical
Keep in mind that if you are over 12 years old you have to apply for your SSN in person.

Are you certain about that? My sons are in their 30's and we got them SS #s via mail when they were in their teens and wanted to find jobs.

23 posted on 10/03/2011 1:16:39 PM PDT by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

Way back when, people (at least in large numbers) didn’t file false deductions for kids, there was a certain level of trust that no longer exists.


Actually that’s not true. On 4/15/1987 seven million children disappeared in the US overnight.

That’s the date the IRS started requiring SS# for all minor dependents on their tax returns.


24 posted on 10/03/2011 1:43:44 PM PDT by chaosagent (Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: chaosagent

oh, I know there was that cheating going on, probably since the inception of SS. But what raw # of children were reported the year before? What percent does 7M represent of the total number of children claimed?

When I referred to ‘back when” I wasn’t referring to the 70s and 80s when it became rampant and necessary to require kids’ SS#s.


25 posted on 10/03/2011 1:57:54 PM PDT by EDINVA ( Jimmy McMillan '12: because RENT'S, TOO DAMN HIGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

Well, according to here

http://www.childstats.gov/americaschildren/tables/pop1.asp?popup=true

there were 63.1 million children in the US in 1987, so over 10% disappeared.


26 posted on 10/03/2011 2:11:14 PM PDT by chaosagent (Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: chaosagent

hey, I ADDED 3 in ‘87, does that help?


27 posted on 10/03/2011 2:30:38 PM PDT by EDINVA ( Jimmy McMillan '12: because RENT'S, TOO DAMN HIGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

I didn’t have to apply in person either. My parents applied for me before my 16th birthday.


28 posted on 10/03/2011 3:49:02 PM PDT by Amberdawn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wintertime; ethical

wintertime:

I must say, your ill-considered comments referring to my post, and to me, as an Obama defender/apologist/excuse-maker and “useful idiot,” warrant an apology.

If you have any comprehension skills, instead of just reading what you want a post to say, you would have recognized that I was advising ethical that SS rules/regs changed dramatically in the early 80’s, and that in 1977 a 12 year old did not have to go in person to obtain a SS#. I tend to prefer accuracy when addressing matters relating to Obama and the WH press corps. Pity if that offends you.

I shall await your apology.


29 posted on 10/03/2011 4:08:02 PM PDT by EDINVA ( Jimmy McMillan '12: because RENT'S, TOO DAMN HIGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

Wow on #16. None of that made any sense at all.


30 posted on 10/03/2011 4:15:51 PM PDT by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA
How do you know someone 12 or older did not have to apply in person in 1977? I know in 1955 you had to apply in person. I know in 2011 you have to apply in person if over 12. In 1977 a 15 year old kid in Hawaii does not get a SSN issued out of Connecticut. And why does that same SSN fail the E-Verify check, flagged with a Special Indicator Code for fraud. At this point you don't continue to speculate you get answers. If I failed E-Verify I would have to answer questions and offer proof of why I shouldn't of failed it. If I had a SSN issued in 1977 out of a state I had never lived in, I would have to answer some questions.
31 posted on 10/03/2011 4:22:15 PM PDT by ethical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ethical
How do you know someone 12 or older did not have to apply in person in 1977?

I got my SS card in 1968-69. Neither I or my parents had to apply in person. I just called my dad to confirm it.

My sons got their cards, as I posted earlier, when they were around 15-16 years old in the mid 80's. Neither mom, dad or the the boys had to apply in person.

32 posted on 10/03/2011 4:30:55 PM PDT by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ethical

I had to apply for mine in Michigan in person in about 1956. I needed it because I was going to work for Wrigley’s Super Market, bagging groceries for .65c an hour plus tips. I was 14.


33 posted on 10/03/2011 4:36:21 PM PDT by Ax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

There is a silver lining to the progressives reaching the point of shooting the useful idiots, most of the Media are useful idiots. Large numbers of PHDs are useful idiots. The Democrat herd would be considerably thinned.


34 posted on 10/03/2011 4:43:50 PM PDT by W. W. SMITH (Islam is an instrument of enslavement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA
I shall await your apology.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Oh wow! You're OOOOOOFended!

No way, is an apology forthcoming. Obama entire past life is one big collection of thousands of “explanations”! We see them every day on Free Republic. Yours is just one more floating around in the toilet bowl of Obama’s life. Normal people don't have to explain their lives. Their lives are straight forward.

35 posted on 10/03/2011 5:05:58 PM PDT by wintertime (I am a Constitutional Restorationist!!! Yes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ethical

Ethical, the only question I posed was about having to apear in person at a Social Security office to obtain a SS# in 1977. I think you may have wrong information about having to apply in person for a SOCIAL SECURITY card in 1955. I applied for mine in 1960 by mail. It may be be, as I noted above, that you might be confusing the 1955 requirements for a SOCIAL SECURITY card with a SELECTIVE SERVICE card. I can’t vouch for 1955, only 1960. However, I DO think there’s confusion there between the two “SS” cards.

My intent was to offer a suggestion from a friendly source rather than to be challenged by the WH press corps. Apparently it’s been taken as some sort of Obama defense, which couldn’t be farther from the truth, but I am quite thru with this thread. Good luck with your quest.


36 posted on 10/03/2011 5:44:55 PM PDT by EDINVA ( Jimmy McMillan '12: because RENT'S, TOO DAMN HIGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA
Certainly did not mean to take things the wrong way. Simply to clarify. Whether or not you have to apply in person if over 12, as it is today, is the minor point. The bigger point is how do you get a Connecticut SSN when you live in Hawaii and are 15? And why does that number fail the E-Verify check and get flagged for fraud?
37 posted on 10/03/2011 6:08:04 PM PDT by ethical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

Actually, I’m neither offended nor surprised. I just was testing to see if you had the guts to recognize what an ill-informed response you posted to my suggestion to ethical, and to apologize for it. I doubted it and you proved my assumption.

Your tagline is a hoot. What have YOU done for Constitutional restoration? Post on a website? My life partner and I have filed four SCOTUS petitions and/or amicus briefs, two of which were accepted in winning cases, all for conservative causes. How’s that for straightforward?


38 posted on 10/03/2011 7:52:27 PM PDT by EDINVA ( Jimmy McMillan '12: because RENT'S, TOO DAMN HIGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; ...

Excellent.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2787207/posts?page=5#5


39 posted on 10/05/2011 7:59:21 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ethical
I know that in 1955 you had to apply for your SSN in person

So odd that people have different recollections, which makes me wonder if things were different in different states. I got my social security card when I was 14/15 (1974/5)while living in Georgia and I remember filling out the paperwork and mailing it. In fact, it might have been the first 'real' piece of mail. It was a big deal to me because that mean I was so very very grown up.

40 posted on 10/06/2011 7:02:33 AM PDT by SoftballMominVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson