Posted on 11/18/2011 9:04:36 PM PST by Kevmo
That's clever.
Do you know what the difference between plagiarism and citing someone's work? I didn't think so.
That’s nice that the PCR technique was accepted by scientists. The tectonic plate theory wasn’t. It took decades for scientists to accept it, and most of that was due to the dictum that the scientists who were against it basically died off and a new generation of people were more open minded. Similar thing happened to LENR. Rossi’s device is just the latest development in LENR.
What I’m trying to say is DROP the smug conspiracy thesis.
***Just as soon as the seagulls & naysayers drop the conspiracy theory.
At least there was more clarity in your post this time. T4BTT
However, unless my data is wrong, this appears to be nothing more than another shell company. Someone, prove me wrong?
***When Microsoft first started, how many employees did they have? Two. These guys are already twice as big as Microsoft was when they started... ;-)
If they really are building a site in Sweden, or as they say, Opening a New Branch then they think they’ve got something. Does Sweden allow lay people to access permits, architectural drawings as well as the engineering/architecture drawings from the firm they are going to use? Does Hydrofusion have other branches and where are they located?
***None of this rinky dink stuff matters.
They are also using a quote from Tesla. Is it possible to have an appeal to authority beyond the grave..?
***Yes. But they aren’t in a debate, they’re setting up a business. Those are 2 different worlds with 2 completely different sets of rules.
It also appears that they thought long and hard about the content to put on their website and besides the pages that canonize Rossi, there’s pretty much nothing there. I like this minimalist approach, it’s very clean. Dr. Judy Wood could learn a thing or two,
***You are very long winded, full of sound and fury, but in the end it signifies nothing.
Observe what a ten year old with a copy of Front Page can do:
Dr. Wood
***Not really within the realm of stuff I care about.
Kevmo, you never responded to this post, granted it was only pinged to WW:
***It’s too long winded, full of sound & fury, you know the rest.
We are getting near the point where we learn whether:
1) Rossi has literally changed the world forever and for good. I’d put that on my C.V. if I were him
2) Rossi has had good intentions but was blinded by test bias where he saw what he was looking for.
3) Rossi deliberately set out to scam people.
While I believe #3 is the answer,
***And I believe there is some science worth pursuing here.
to carry out a scam of this magnitude would be as amazing as a working Ecat.
***Exactly. Also the reason why I keep posting about this stuff, because it’s fascinating even if it is a scam. How is it that some supposedly failed businessman/engineer is so good at acting?
Do you know what the difference between plagiarism and citing someone’s work? I didn’t think so.
***The Fusion Revolution
Sunday, November 20, 2011 7:30:40 PM · 321 of 322
Kevmo to dinodino
You keep using that word, but I don’t think it means what you think it means.
***You hint elsewhere that when I use the phrase “sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic” that I’m plagiarizing because I do not cite the source of the phrase, which by now is a cliche. Here you do exactly what you claim against me by yanking a line from “The Princess Bride”. You are disingenuous to say the least.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies
Sorry about that dinodino, I thought you were the one who posted the comment to me.
A great flick by the way even if it was directed by meathead.
Then you have the nerve to say this:
***You are very long winded, full of sound and fury, but in the end it signifies nothing.
And again, you plagiarize someone although this is in common use and even Faulkner used some of it in the title to one of the world's worse books ever. The sad part is you don't know where it's from.
You’re the only guy I’ve come across who claims plagiarism from cliches. You’re the one who aint right.
Life’s ... a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
Macbeth Act 5, scene 5
Holm: “I can’t go into details yet”“.
That's OK. The details will come out during the trial.
This will be my standard post to you that says you’re not worth trying to have reasonable discussion, also says “buzz off” & doesn’t leave crickets. But if it offends you to the point that you get it removed like my prior innocuous citation then I’ll have to come up with some other ‘ignore button’ post.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/backroom/2800058/posts?page=55#55
To: Moonman62
This means I have nothing more to say to you about LENR. Bye.
55 posted on Sunday, October 30, 2011 4:41:07 PM by Kevmo (Caveat lurkor pro se ipso judicatis: Let the lurker decide for himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
You learned how to use Wikipedia, congratulations.
That’s in Wikipedia?
You seem a bit overwrought regarding this issue of plagiarizing simple cliches that Americans use every day. Maybe you should add more bran to your diet.
To be so pester’d with a popinjay!
Henry IV Part 1, 1. 3
Amazing. One person telling another to grow up. On an internet blog.
How deliciously juvenile of you.
Bravo, you've learned to cut and paste Shakespeare. I notice you've yet to clear up that little error of yours where you said I plagiarized from The Princess Bride
Now if only you'd learn to quote someone properly so it's easier to follow your posts but, I guess you're too busy cheer leading for Rossi.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
