Posted on 12/22/2011 12:26:04 PM PST by jazusamo
In his interview with 60 Minutes, Barack Obama said he was the “fourth-best president.” This was cut from the program. Since it is such a compelling statement, I can only presume it was cut — like so many other things that were great in journalistic terms — to keep Obama from looking bad.
But those making fun of Obama for this statement have just skimmed the surface. Actually, there is a lot to be discovered from further examining what he said. And, before proceeding, I should note that my main professional training was in U.S. history, just to make clear that I’m treating this seriously and from a basis of study.
First, Obama showed how he takes the total support of the mass media for granted, something inconceivable for any previous president. He begins:
The issue here is not going be a list of accomplishments. As you said yourself, Steve, you know, I would put our legislative and foreign-policy accomplishments in our first two years against any president …
In other words, Obama is attributing the fact that he’s a great president to the interviewer, Steve Kroft. According to Obama, Croft has already proclaimed him to be wonderful. Obama is just going along with what the media said.
It has often been remarked that Obama is a narcissist, but what we see here is actually dangerous, a man who is so closed and arrogant that he really cannot take criticism into account. Any leader, except a dictator (and as a result they make lots of mistakes), needs to listen to criticism and adjust policies, not necessarily change them entirely, but alter them to deal with his own errors, new discoveries, and changing conditions.
Note in Obama’s case how his new “jobs bill” is merely a repeat of the failed stimulus. And similar things can be said about his foreign policy — he simply does not take in developments and criticism. This is parallel to a ship’s captain being warned that there’s a big iceberg ahead, and continuing with his speech about how he has set the perfect course.
This theme is reinforced by his saying: “The issue here is not going be a list of accomplishments.” In other words, no one can even dispute that he has had great accomplishments. The science is settled; debate is closed. This also tells us that if Obama gets a second term, he won’t do any better at all.
The end of the quote is also patronizing:
But, you know, but when it comes to the economy, we’ve got a lot more work to do.
Yes, that minor problem of the economy.
But in terms of history, what Obama says has been misinterpreted:
I would put our legislative and foreign-policy accomplishments in our first two years against any president — with the possible exceptions of Johnson, FDR, and Lincoln — just in terms of what we’ve gotten done in modern history.
In passing, let’s note that Obama is one of the most inarticulate of all presidents. He finds it difficult to construct a proper sentence. Take away the hype and his level of expression is on the same level as that of George W. Bush. And that is not meant to be exaggerated. I think it is precisely accurate.
But to be fair to Obama, he was only referring to the first two years of previous presidents. Indeed, during their first two years in office, neither Roosevelt nor Lincoln had any great foreign policy accomplishments at all. And Johnson’s main “accomplishment,” tragically, was the Vietnam War.
So, starting with Lincoln, what presidents had great foreign policy accomplishments in their first two years? Between 1861, when Lincoln took office, and 1941 — with the exception that proves the rule of 1917-1920 — the United States was mostly isolationist and not a great power.
I would say that the president with the greatest foreign policy record in his first two years was Harry Truman, who had to deal with the end of the war with Japan, get the armed forces home, and deal with the political end of World War Two, the transformation of America into a peacetime great power, and the acceptance of the need to fight the Cold War.
Other top presidents on foreign policy in the first two years would be — in chronological order — Eisenhower, Kennedy, Reagan, and George Bush. I’d explain in detail but it would take too much space.
What has Obama accomplished? He can only claim one thing: to have made America more popular after George W. Bush. There is some truth to this, but it is exaggerated. In fact, while at first there was a popularity effect, it has diminished, and anyway, popularity is not the most important thing in international affairs.
Obama has not accomplished anything in Africa, Asia, or South America. There has not been any major gain in relations with Russia, either. U.S.-European relations are friendly — but is this some great accomplishment?
As for the Middle East, Obama has been disastrous. He singlehandedly sabotaged the peace process and has opened the door to anti-American radical regimes.
Can anyone seriously maintain that Obama has achieved a huge amount beyond briefly “restoring” America’s popularity to — though he and his supporters never admit this — the levels it enjoyed under Bill Clinton?
Then there’s domestic policy. And here we must point out an important Obama assumption: he feels a great president is someone who can brag about “what we’ve gotten done” by getting new laws passed. I think Obama genuinely doesn’t understand that having new laws — more spending; more regulation — is not inevitably better.
A president can be great for not messing up the non-governmental sector, for not passing new laws. From Grant to McKinley, along with Calvin Coolidge, Dwight Eisenhower, and Ronald Reagan, rapid economic progress and prosperity took place precisely because they didn’t get too much “done” in Obama’s sense of the word. That is vital to understand: America would be better off if Obama had done less.
As for activist presidents, though, whom I’d nominate for achievement in their first two years: Teddy Roosevelt brought needed regulation. One might also list Franklin Roosevelt, Truman (who for some reason Obama continues to ignore), and Johnson. Actually, I’m not sure Lincoln would qualify despite his greatness since the first two years of his term was spent fighting a largely losing Civil War.
You might well want to change that list of best presidents on foreign or domestic issues, but the point is that Obama doesn’t belong on it. I won’t go into detail about the damage that he did to the United States, especially economically, because you know about that already.
Finally, note that Obama said “possible exceptions” of Lincoln and the other two. Obama is saying that maybe he is number one, the best president ever. I’m not surprised that many Americans can’t believe that they’ve elected such a “zany” person to power.
At a time of extreme crisis, at home and abroad, the man at the steering wheel is visibly ideologically obsessed, psychologically unfit, and not competent. Many people would dismiss that sentence with scorn and insults. But isn’t it obvious once the hype is discarded?
What is especially frightening here is Obama’s combination of egomania and blindness. Without self-criticism, there is no room for improvement. Without humility, errors will multiply.
Pete Seeger is a left-wing songwriter. His song “Waist Deep in the Big Muddy” — about a foolish captain who marches his men into an impassable swamp — was used to attack Nixon. Yet I think it applies even better to Obama:
Well, I’m not going to point any moral;
I’ll leave that for yourself
Maybe you’re still walking, you’re still talking
You’d like to keep your health.
But every time I read the papers
That old feeling comes on;
We’re waist deep in the Big Muddy
And the big fool says to push on….Waist deep! Neck deep! Soon even a
Tall man’ll be over his head! We’re
Waist deep in the Big Muddy!
And the big fool says to push on!
The sickness of it all is unbearable for any REAL AMERICAN.
I cannot even stand to look at this fraud on TV or even listen to his twisted rhetorical lies.
The American electorate has made a number of bad mistakes, but this one takes the WORST WINNER award. And it probably will for many administrations to come.
The man has no grasp of reality. Obviously his 57 state and harvard univursity reality does not overlap with mine.
You said it well, I couldn’t agree more.
Actually Seeger’s song was used to attack LBJ first, then Nixon. Seeger appeared on the CBS Smother Brothers’ Show in ‘67...I remember that WJBK in Detroit, then a CBS affiliate ran a pro law and order PSA while Seeger was on...thus some of us didn’t get to see it.
It was all pretty tame by today’s standards.
I am waiting for the moment when this fraud stands on the steps of the Capitol and publically declares himself messiah.
I put nothing past this arrogant fool!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhJNJgjpuWk
Arrogance for no apparent reason does not sit well with John Q. America.
I would put Barack Hussein Obama's accomplishments in his first two years up against Emperor Hideki Tojo's accomplishments in the first week of December, 1941, or against General Ross and his work in DC during August of 1814. There has been no decade in our history in which greater damage has been inflicted on our country, nor has there been a single man who did more harm to America than the current occupant of our White House has done. Even with Tojo and Ross, we knew that we could rebuild, recover, and eventually prevail. With Obama, this might be the end of America as a beacon of hope and freedom before the West drops back into tyranny and ignorance.
When WJBK was first started in 1948, it’s call letters stood for w(Jesus Be Kind)
I share your thoughts.
Amen to that, and arrogance doesn't get much more blatant than that.
Left to right: Admiral Yamamoto, Emperor Hirohito, Prime Minister Tojo
With me, Obama will always be #2.
He is not even the fourth best of my lifetime.
Of course they had to cut it. Otherwise the sheeple who still watch 60 Minutes would have seen their emperor naked save for his over-weaning narcissism and egotism.
Of course they had to cut it. Otherwise the sheeple who still watch 60 Minutes would have seen their emperor naked save for his over-weaning narcissism and egotism.
Of course they had to cut it. Otherwise the sheeple who still watch 60 Minutes would have seen their emperor naked save for his over-weaning narcissism and egotism.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.