Skip to comments.
My strange visitors: USAISC visiting my pro-family blog?
Last Days Watchman ^
| Julio Severo
Posted on 01/12/2012 7:24:32 AM PST by juliosevero
My strange visitors
United States Army Information System Command headquarters visiting my pro-family blog?
By Julio Severo
The Department of Homeland Security. The Human Rights Campaign. The USAISC headquarters. These were some of my strange visitors in the last six months.
On July 27 and 29, 2011, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) appeared in my tracking report visiting my English blog. About this visit, WorldNetDaily, the most important conservative news website in English, reported,
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security has begun watching a blog posted by a Christian who was forced to flee Brazil because of the conflict between that nations pro-homosexual hate crimes agenda and his advocacy for traditional marriage. Exactly why the U.S. government, which several times has linked Christians and conservatives with terrorism, is watching Julio Severos unabashedly Christian Last Days Watchman blog isnt clear. A WND request to the DHS for comment did not generate a response.
DHS refused to answer regarding its intentions or visits to my blog. But the intents of the Obama administration are not obscure. Last month, the US government announced that advancing the homosexual agenda would be one of its top foreign policy priorities, and directed all of its embassies, consulates and other US government entities that operate overseas to make this agenda a priority.
So if gay activists enjoy the top favor with the US government, are opponents of the gay agenda in the hit list? Probably, they are not yet aiming at pro-family Christians to kill them, but certainly to kill their ministries and financial resources.
On August 21, 2011, the Human Rights Campaign was recorded visiting my blog in a tracking report. This is the most powerful homosexual organization in America. In the next few days, AllOut, a heavily-funded gay group, launched an online petition campaign to have accounts of 10 pro-family groups cut off from PayPal. Even though I am not an organization, my name was included in this public gay campaign, and my account was closed. To me, PayPal explained that I am ineligible to received donations from my friends and readers because you are not a registered non-profit organization. To AllOut, PayPal explained that they closed my account because We take very seriously any cases where a user has incited hatred, violence or intolerance because of a persons sexual orientation.
Now, I can no longer receive donations from my friends through PayPal. Again, WorldNetDaily denounced the attack against my blog.
I wonder what would have happened if a homosexual activist had had his PayPal account closed after a Christian conservative campaign. Probably, he would be able to walk into any US embassy and consulate anywhere in the world and say, Hey, I am a gay under persecution from conservative Christians. PayPal even closed my account because of these Christians! He would be immediately put at the front of the line to migrate to the United States as an Obama-favored individual and receive legal assistance to sue PayPal!
|
The latest visitor: the United States Army Information System Command (USAISC) |
The latest visitor to my blog was the strangest: the visit was tracked directly to the United States Army Information System Command (USAISC) headquarters! If my English blog has a fan there, I wonder if USAISC, which has a secure, sophisticated, internal communication system, allows its visitors or military employees to access external internet.
The United States is one of the leading Christian nations in the world, but has a government that has been actively promoting the gay agenda through its aid agencies and embassies. And since USAISC is part of the US government, it would be no wonder if it has been monitoring opposition to the new US interests. What is important to gay activists is important to the US government, and recently The Advocated, the largest gay magazine in America, took a recent look at my blog. So why cant the gay-friendly Department of Homeland Security, Human Rights Campaign and USAISC headquarters take a look too?
I would like to think that the strange visitor to my blog is just a sign that I have a friend in the USAISC headquarters. If not, the Christian answer to military threats should be the same answer given by Elisha: Those who are with us are more than those who are with them. (2 Kings 6:16 ESV)
Besides, God has his own armies and he can destroy any wicked army: And that night the angel of the LORD went out and struck down 185,000 in the camp of the Assyrians. And when people arose early in the morning, behold, these were all dead bodies. (2 Kings 19:35 ESV)
Even though the US Army has many Christian members, God has no commitment to bless or protect a government actively promoting homosexuality, abortion and other evils around the world.
May Christian men in the US Army advance Gods Kingdom while the US government and its army are fighting it.
TOPICS: Conspiracy; Military/Veterans; Religion; UFO's; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: dhs; homosexuality; paypal; romney; usaisc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: aimhigh
Only the ones we criticize from time to time....
Oh..wait...that would be ALL OF THEM!
21
posted on
01/12/2012 11:48:34 AM PST
by
G Larry
("I dream of a day when a man is judged by the content of his Character.")
To: juliosevero; 185JHP; 230FMJ; AFA-Michigan; AKA Elena; APatientMan; Abathar; Absolutely Nobama; ...
Homosexual Agenda and Moral Absolutes Ping! Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
Juliosevero's site is being watched by the DHS because his Christian beliefs condemn the practice and promotion of homosexuality. His story is well worth reading. PayPal is another weapon in the batter to force the "celebration" of homosexuality on the entire world.
22
posted on
01/12/2012 4:00:42 PM PST
by
little jeremiah
(We will have to go through hell to get out of hell)
To: little jeremiah
PAYPAL IS, I did not know this.
The DHS watching, not surprising but the court today gave a big blow to this red admin .
23
posted on
01/12/2012 4:28:55 PM PST
by
manc
(Marriage is between one man and one woman.Trolls get a life, I HATE OUR BIASED LIBERAL MEDIA.)
To: Mr.Unique
About this visit, WorldNetDaily, the most important conservative news website in English, reported,...AH HAHAHAHAHA! Good one.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
Why do you laugh? Do you know of another important conservative news website that has the readership numbers that WND has?
24
posted on
01/12/2012 4:39:09 PM PST
by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS! This means liberals AND libertarians (same thing) NO LIBS!)
To: Cletus.D.Yokel
What exactly is hyperbolic about that comment?
25
posted on
01/12/2012 4:40:21 PM PST
by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS! This means liberals AND libertarians (same thing) NO LIBS!)
To: antisocial; caver
You think the New York Times is more conservative than World Net Daily?
You must stop reading EVERYTHING after a sentence or tgwo.
26
posted on
01/12/2012 4:42:34 PM PST
by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS! This means liberals AND libertarians (same thing) NO LIBS!)
To: juliosevero
To AllOut, PayPal explained that they closed my account because We take very seriously any cases where a user has incited hatred, violence or intolerance because of a persons sexual orientation. Now, I can no longer receive donations from my friends through PayPal. And....Tomorrow there will be deafening silence from Rush, Hannity, Beck, Ingram, Levine, Medved, and other so-called "conservatives". Their screeners will block all questions on this topic and e-mails will be returned unopened.
27
posted on
01/12/2012 4:43:39 PM PST
by
wintertime
(I am a Co nstitutional Restorationist!!! Yes!)
To: wintertime
Yes indeed - all these “conservative” commentators or whatever they are rarely if ever touch the dreaded topic of faggotry. Or they embrace it and become its pet, like Coulter (puke!).
28
posted on
01/12/2012 4:50:02 PM PST
by
little jeremiah
(We will have to go through hell to get out of hell)
To: Responsibility2nd; Mr.Unique
I never see actual conservatives sneering at WND.
29
posted on
01/12/2012 4:51:34 PM PST
by
little jeremiah
(We will have to go through hell to get out of hell)
To: manc
What did the court do today? I need cheering up!
30
posted on
01/12/2012 4:52:23 PM PST
by
little jeremiah
(We will have to go through hell to get out of hell)
To: little jeremiah
today or yesterday I think the supreme court rules that the church can fire someone who is not preaching their religion The racist Marxist DOJ sued and in the end they lost at the supreme court. This will have a big repercussion on other issues too.
31
posted on
01/12/2012 5:33:35 PM PST
by
manc
(Marriage is between one man and one woman.Trolls get a life, I HATE OUR BIASED LIBERAL MEDIA.)
To: manc
Aha, that one. Unanimous, too. Good precedent.
32
posted on
01/12/2012 5:46:08 PM PST
by
little jeremiah
(We will have to go through hell to get out of hell)
To: Responsibility2nd
“You think the New York Times is more conservative than World Net Daily?”
I’m not sure who you are responding to, me or this other idiot poster, but both of you are fools and both need some lessons in reading comprehension. Words fail me, and to try and spell it out to you two losers just wears me out. Don’t bother to respond.
33
posted on
01/12/2012 7:15:39 PM PST
by
caver
(Obama: Home of the Whopper)
To: little jeremiah
“I never see actual conservatives sneering at WND.”
How about naming some “actual conservatives” for us.
34
posted on
01/12/2012 7:18:34 PM PST
by
caver
(Obama: Home of the Whopper)
Comment #35 Removed by Moderator
To: ctdonath2
“Many consider, with good reason, WND less than important.
They are very conservative, is that not important?
36
posted on
01/13/2012 5:54:40 AM PST
by
antisocial
(Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
To: caver
“Dumb reponse....”
I was wondering if WND was too conservative to suit your taste?
37
posted on
01/13/2012 5:56:54 AM PST
by
antisocial
(Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
To: Responsibility2nd
“You think the New York Times is more conservative than World Net Daily?
You must stop reading EVERYTHING after a sentence or tgwo.”
How confused are you?
38
posted on
01/13/2012 5:59:02 AM PST
by
antisocial
(Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
To: antisocial
That which is important does not necessarily make one important.
39
posted on
01/13/2012 5:59:55 AM PST
by
ctdonath2
($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com/)
To: little jeremiah
I never see actual conservatives sneering at WND. I guess that proves conclusively that I am not a conservative. How can I argue with stellar WND logic?
40
posted on
01/13/2012 7:58:52 AM PST
by
Mr.Unique
(Very generic, non-offensive, tagline.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson