Skip to comments.Birthermania!
Posted on 03/23/2012 1:05:00 AM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome
Herman Cain's wife never referred to Kenya as Herman's "home country." Maybe Michelle didn't mean to say "home country." But it's a little odd that she did.
During his candidacy, no one doubted that Jesse Jackson was born in a house in South Carolina. Most candidates have living witnesses of their births. Obama had none (except his paternal grandmother).
The Daily Kos did not somehow get the sealed birth certificate of Alan Keyes and post it online during his campaign. Yet, mysteriously, somehow the liberal website posted Obama's "birth certificate" in early 2008.
At least, we were told that it was Obama's birth certificate. We were told for over three years that Hawaii had no other birth certificate. According to the fact-checking sites, the "long form" was a conservative myth which simply did not exist in the Hawaii archives. Press Secretary Robert Gibbs assured us that the "birth certificate" was "right there online."
So it was a little strange when a long-form birth certificate appeared out of nowhere on April 27, 2011 -- on the eve of Jerome Corsi's Where's the Birth Certificate? book release and in the midst of Donald Trump's table-pounding campaign over the bizarre secrecy of Barack Hussein Obama II.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Thank you for posting this! Clear, concise, ,thorough.
Must read for all, especially non-birthers.
"If Obama really had an authentic birth certificate all along, why did he allow Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin to suffer the pain of imprisonment in Ft. Leavenworth for six months? What kind of human being would allow Lakin to be unnecessarily imprisoned? Only to suddenly "release" the alleged document that Lakin had requested -- at the end of Lakin's prison term."
Outrageous. Evil, even.
25 years ago, we had Ronald Reagan, Johnny Cash, and Bob Hope.
If you can't appreciate the pure beauty of the violin after hearing this, something's wrong with your ears.
Or you can get raw with these strings.
How about this gamechanger from America's Got Talent (which they SHOULD have won).
And finally, this, dedicated to the one and only rdb2, whose eyes are growing dim.
Either way, the violin is sweet yet LETHAL.
I think you’ll like this article.
Bump for later
The following is the comment I just posted at American Thinker:
More disturbing to me than having a likely usurper in the White House is that all of governors, state attorneys general, state secretaries of state, all law enforcement agencies, all federal and state senators and representatives, judges, all of the Marxist media and nearly all of the conservative media, and ( saddest of all) our very highest military, have done nothing to stop it. **That** is very scary! Indeed!
Our nation is in serious trouble. The usurper in the White House is merely a symptom of deep moral rot infecting nearly all of our cultural, legal, and political institutions. May God save our nation, I pray.
I saw it. I've now left a thank-you to the author and expressed the hope that the piece would be widely-read. :)
Back in '52 the GOP had a candidate who was undocumented until the October before the election, despite having just won the biggest war in the history of the world.
Of course, even if he'd remained undocumented until the following January, he'd still have been eligible, droolers notwithstanding.
But it's nevertheless quaint and charming that they felt the need to document him anyway. Actually, the effort was more of a publicity stunt by Lonnie Roberts, who wanted to highlight that Eisenhower had been born in Denison. (But the birfers of the day claimed it was a conspiracy to hide the fact General Eisenhower was Jewish, LOL).
1. Did then Senator Obama and Harvard Law School graduate Obama accidentally lose the long form birth certificate that was given to his mother back in August 1961 by Kapiolani Hospital, so he had to order a new one in 2007?
2. Why didn't then Senator Obama order a long form instead of a short form, when, at that time, 2007, a person had a choice of ordering whichever form he wanted?
3. What happened to the birth certificate Obama talks about in one of his books, the one he accidentally found as a youngster among his school shot documents?
4. Did the dog eat it?
5. Or, was it in such bad shape because it was so old that then Senator Obama felt that it was time to get a new one in June 2007, which meant that in June 2007 Senator Obama now had 2 birth certificates: The badly damaged one that his mother was given when she left Kapiolani Hospital in August 1961 and the new short one.
6. If the original one was in such bad shape, did Obama throw it away after he obtained the short form in 2007, or did he keep it as a backup in case some government agency would NOT accept the short form as a valid birth certificate?
7. If President Obama still had his badly damaged original long form birth certificate when he ordered a new one in April 2011, why didn't he show it at the April 27, 2011 news conference just before he displayed his new long from birth certificate?
8. Why doesn't a courageous reporter or tv host sit down with Obama one-to-one and finally ask Obama why he ordered a short form in 2007 and a long form in April 2011?
9. President Obama may have a reasonable explanation like this one: He moved so often these past years that he could have lost it during one of those moves, because when he looked for it back in 2007, he couldn't find it, and that is the reason why he ordered a new one back in 2007.
10. If, however, President Obama says that the dog ate his original long form certificate that he had for many, many years, then I think that candidate Obama is going to lose some votes come election day Nov. 2012.
Lord Monckton says he’s no birther but BC is a forgery.
Sorry, I just woke up. I guess this is old news.
March 23, 2012, Can you read the date of this article now?
is it my imagination, or is this lie finally starting to come apart.....
I realize it’s “new”, but it’s already been discussed. Since I go to bed early, I missed it last night. More awake now.
George Romney, was born in Mexico to two U.S citizen parents, which made George a U.S. Citizen by birth.
“1. Did then Senator Obama and Harvard Law School graduate Obama accidentally lose the long form birth certificate that was given to his mother back in August 1961 by Kapiolani Hospital, so he had to order a new one in 2007?”
It is all so absurd....
They had to post an obvious fake BC recently.
IF Obumbo had been born at Kapiolani, they would have
records of it.
Surely the POTUS could give them a ring and tell them that he needs the birth records in order to make fools out of us birthers.....crickets chirping
George Romney’s parents never applied for their child US citizenship upon entry back to US soil, therefore he was never a US citizen.
“... But this process only applies to children permanently residing in the U.S. If the child is under 18, was born outside the United States, but lives abroad in the physical and legal custody of a U.S. citizen parent or U.S. citizen grandparent, the parent or grandparent must apply for naturalization of the child. In addition, more criteria must be met...”
"Here's some flotsam for your jetsome."
First, you lead in with a personal attack on my FR handle in the form of (albeit clumsy and irrelevant) tongue-in-cheeky ridicule. That's one.
Then, there's the quip about an "undocumented" GOP candidate in the '52 election despite having just won the biggest war in the history of the world. Are you attempting to conflate the proven life story and patriotic, even heroic exploits of Eisenhower with the bs life narrative of the fraud currently in the WH? Community Organizer cum War Hero? That's two.
Then there's the news article image you posted. I saw you post something similar on another thread and thought to myself, "Is this the new angle, the 'Delayed Birth Certificate'?" Nice try, but from the earlier image's story: "No doubt had ever been raised that Eisenhower was eligible. . ." Can even close be said of "Obama"? That's three.
". . . droolers notwithstanding." Pure Alinsky. That's four.
"(But the birfers of the day claimed it was a conspiracy to hide the fact General Eisenhower was Jewish, LOL)."
Managed to insert "birfer" slur, (nut job) conspiracy, and racial innuendo into one sentence. Impressive. And no, I'm not LOL-ing. That's five.
That's quite a volley of feces you've thrown up there in one post. I will not personally request that ozone be brought down on you, but if my observations here, coupled with the past experiences (of at least some of the ) others who I am pinging here are of merit, I would hope that this goes to the mods, and we are in an ibtz zone, here.
To any I pinged who are unappreciative of my unsolicited ping, I tender my regrets.
Maybe the E.O. of Mar. 16 was in anticipation of or in case of the truth coming out.
And the ensuing marches, possible riots that would likely happen.
Neither “party” wants to touch this issue...as it calls into question the very legitimacy of the “elite” ruling the USA today.
You didn't ping me, but I wish you had. I love watching after-birthers get the smackdown they deserve. Good job.
Seems to me the very same scenario played out at the playtime
impeachment trial of WJC.
Santorum birtherism is not welcome on FR. His father served in the military in WWII, aptly demonstrating his loyalty. There is also a document on the internet that shows Italy revoked Aldo Santorum’s citizenship back in the 1930s.
Back in 2008 he was a clean sheet. McCain wouldn't even let people call him by his full name. If you didn't worship Obama, you were a racist. Your not voting for Obama? You would get the quizzical look, the side glance, knowing you were pinned as a racist.
Now, when you pay 5 bucks for a gallon of gas and find he has a fraudulent SS registration and BC, it pisses people off, and rightfully so. People are standing up to friends and neighbors, calling him a fraudulent POS. The race card has worn thin. It has no power this year.
It will be shown that Obama is America’s first illegal alien POTUS...a sure lock for the hispanic vote in November 2012.
Maybe Barry didn't mean to say, "my Muslim faith," but it's a little odd that he did.
Just curious - show of hands:
How many Christians here have ever accidentally called themselves a Muslim?
History will not be kind. At all.
I think youll like this article.
Thanks, yes I did. I wish people wouldn't use Sun Yat Sen as an example of Hawaiian's registering foreigners as having been born there, because this happened so long ago before Hawaii even became a state. Something more recent would serve as a far better example, and Arpaio's Cold Case Posse asserted that they had such proof.
Apart from that, rxsid recently posted an article regarding a man who was born in Brisbane Australia, but who claims to have a Hawaiian birth certificate.
Such a document would do much to open people's eyes to the notion that Hawaii's documents cannot be trusted at face value.
Again, thanks for the ping.
Wow—getting a little nasty there, Cynwoody. Let me see...that language, that tone, those words...they ring a bell. Where have I see all that before, in exactly the same vein?
Got it. That is ***exactly*** the way they talk at fogbow. Identical in every word, phrase and nuance.
But that’s surely just a coincidence. Just like your FR crusade against birfer “falsehoods”. All just silly coincidences.
Listen, Cynwoody, you revealed your true colors on the other thread—the one about Obama’s draft registration card. It’s got a glaring error—one that indicates w an astronomically high probability that it was forged after the fact.
However, you, Cynwoody, said there is only one “reasonable” explanation. Poor, honest, victimized Obama was, yes, victimized once again. This time by a “broken” date stamp. There is zero evidence to support that theory, and yet you said that anybody who disagreed (w you) was “unreasonable”. Your way—the pro-Obama (i.e.: the Obama-defense/Obama-exoneration-of-all-wrongdoing, or even suspicion of wrongdoing) way—or the highway. You couldn’t be any more in the tank (for Obama) if you signed your name, ‘yours truly, Foggy Himself’.
Let me give you an exact—exact in every single detail—analogy. You’ve got this guy who steals. Kleptomaniac doesn’t begin to describe him: he steals beyond anything the average kleptomaniac could dream of. When he walks out the door of his house, he steals. Wherever he goes, he steals. If his hands are moving, he’s stealing. It’s what he does; it’s who he is.
So an expensive watch turns up in this guy’s house. Everybody assumes he stole it. Everybody except you, that is. You say he came by it honestly, and if anybody disagrees they are “unreasonable”. Your proof: you offer none.
Obama lies and deceives. That’s what he does; it’s who he is. Everything about him is a lie and a deception. When he opens his mouth to speak, lies come out. If a person were to record every known lie and deception he has uttered or perpetrated, a 500 p book would not hold them all.
Yet when one of the forms he puts out shows signs of forgery—i.e.: deception—you not only jump to Obama’s defense, you impugn those who dare to point out the obvious. The obvious being, the man and his life are lies. Clear, in-your-face, demonstrable lies.
Who on earth does that, Cynwoody? I’m serious. Who jumps to the defense of the most pathological liar ever to strut the American political stage? Who weaves a sob-story-fantasy about this upright, straight-arrow fellow who was (against all odds) victimized by a mythologically “broken” date stamp?
Hear, hear! He and Soros can't possibly believe there would be riots in the streets if he were booted out. The blacks would be ashamed of him and wouldn't riot. The only ones rioting would be those of all races who are fed up with how rotten our government has become. Yes, Obama, you lie! Yes, you Government, you lie!
One more thing about the uber-kleptomaniac w the expensive watch. Yes, he has a receipt, but it’s clearly been tampered with. It’s not in the form the store in which he claims the watch was bought typically prints. In fact, it appears that he or one of his friends forged a receipt so he could claim the watch was honestly purchased.
You, however, say w certitude-not-supported-by-one-shred-of-evidence that the cash register computer is to blame. It just happened to be sufficiently broken that day to print an anomalous receipt. You actually claim that, and evidently do it w a straight face.
Do you have any idea how ridiculous you look? You’ve got the world’s foremost kleptomaniac holding a valuable watched w an obviously forged receipt, and yet you weave a fantasy about the cash register computer just going a little bonkers that day.
There’s Obama Kool Aid, and then there’s spiked Obama Kool Aid...if you get my drift.
Re: Dwight Eishenhower
A small army of neighbors, friends, and relatives ( along with Eisenhower's brother) stood ready to testify that:
**They knew the parents of Ike Eisenhower.
**They visited the new baby and mom and brought meals and gifts on the day little Ike was born or very soon afterward. They could testify of the pregnancy.
**There are likely church records still existing that prove his christening, and many witnesses still living could testify that they attended.
If Obama had evidence of this sort, his eligibility would never be in question. He doesn't have witnesses that can testify of his origins.
So! ....Here is a refutation of your post and I managed to do it without calling you a drooler, afterbirfer, or stating that your post is jetsome, as you did with Flotsam_Jetsome. Alinsky tactics are like the wack a mole game at a carnival. Do you seriously think you can get away with these tactics here on Free Republic? Really?
The first cracks have appeared, and they are spreading. There was a time recently that I had lost heart on this matter. No longer. I really think we’re gonna win this thing.
God bless the good sheriff- amazing how there is only one man in the country (with a platform, that is) willing to state the emperor has no clothes. Truly, you couldnt write a more bizarre drama.
This is going to be immensely entertaining.
Insult to postal workers everywhere: The "broken stamp theory" or "missing ink theory" is an insult to postal workers everywhere.
1. To think that a postal employee would stamp a legal document with the "19" missing and not correct the mistake immediately by re-stamping the Selective Service form is an insult to postal workers everywhere.
2. Show me other Selective Service forms---especially ones from Hawaii---where the "19" is also missing.
3. If you can't do it, then it looks like Obama's Selective Service form is the only one in the universe with the "19" missing.
4. Also, show me another Selective Service form where the date of the stamp is EARLIER than the date of the person's signature.
5. Again, if you can't do it, then it means that Obama's Selective Service form is the only one in the universe where the postal date stamp is dated EARLIER than the DATE of the the person's SIGNATURE.
You hit the nail on the head. Your perfect analogy can’t be refuted.
Whenever I mentioned hiding the education records, I never got an answer. Just the education records, no BC, NBC, SS#, Selective Service Card, etc. (((crickets)))
Winning-the-ballgame mentality is what’s left. Years invested in opposition can’t possibly be discarded because they don’t want to lose the ballgame and afraid of the eventual I-told-you-so.
This is not a schoolyard it’s the Republic, stupid! Four more years of 0b0z0 will end this Republic.
PS. I never thought I would defend the Republic that I worked so hard to destroy! Professor Alinsky
Kuligowski has certainly covered all the bases. Thank you for the ping to a great article.
On election day Nov. 2012, many voters will stop by their neighborhood gas stations to get some gas before they head on to their voting sites.
If the price of gas is $4 to $5 a gallon at the pump, a lot of these voters will be in an angry mood when they pay their high gas bills and head on to their voting sites.
Many of these voters will take out their anger and frustration over this gas mess in the voting booth by voting against Obama come election day Nov. 2012.
What’s with the “missing” 19?
We should ask Farrakhan who’s the Guru on the number 19!!
However, the seal is correct because the date is correct. It was year 80 AD.
How’s that for an explanation. Do you have a problem with that?
Gee, I think I’ll join the defenders. I can explain everything with ease with no accountability.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.