Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Settlement In “No Gay Reception” Case: Public Businesses Do Not Have a License to Discriminate
ACLU Blog of Rights | Aug 24 2012 | Joshua Block

Posted on 08/26/2012 5:22:38 AM PDT by scottjewell

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
I was interested in hearing more about this case after posting about it here:

"Vermont Inn, 2 Lesbians settle gay marriage case"

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2922119/posts

If anything is to be learned, its that voting on LGBT rights, discrimination laws, and gay marriage has to be taken very seriously, because once on the books there is no further recourse.

1 posted on 08/26/2012 5:22:45 AM PDT by scottjewell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: scottjewell

We need to overturn the civil rights act and allow people to run their private businesses as they wish.

If a business doesn’t want to serve straight white Christians, so be it. I’ll find one that does.


2 posted on 08/26/2012 5:32:28 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scottjewell
Property Rights are an important Individual Right.

Back in the 1950s, some lunch counter owners said that they did not want to serve Negroes. "It's my business, and I can serve who I want." Society made the decision then that collective rights of some privileged classes were more important than property rights of individual business owners. It was a mistake.

It's a dumb business decision to say "I don't serve your kind" but in a society which values property, it is an essential right to say exactly that.

3 posted on 08/26/2012 5:32:34 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Roger Taney? Not a bad Chief Justice. John Roberts? A really awful Chief Justice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Ultimately, property rights and personal rights are the same thing.

Calvin Coolidge
4 posted on 08/26/2012 5:35:55 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: scottjewell

Interesting that they are now called “Public Businesses”. I suppose “Private Enterprise” is also an antiquated notion in the era of “You didn’t build that”.

I wish I could exclaim “Unbelievable!” alas, that day is long past.


5 posted on 08/26/2012 5:37:08 AM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
We need to overturn the civil rights act and allow people to run their private businesses as they wish.

Indeed - People are taught that 'civil rights' is the holy grail of life except it is anything but that. It is a tool that Marxist use to get what they want. Just who has these civil rights? Do I have civil rights? Obviously the owners of the Wildflower Inn don't have civil rights.

6 posted on 08/26/2012 5:37:56 AM PDT by Altura Ct.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: scottjewell
Many people believe that owning a business means that the business owner has the absolute right to serve, or refuse to serve, whomever they like, but that’s simply not true.

The next step? Force a church to perform a gay wedding.

7 posted on 08/26/2012 5:40:50 AM PDT by VRW Conspirator (We were the tea party before there was a tea party. - Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

One of my favorite presidents.


8 posted on 08/26/2012 5:42:36 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Roger Taney? Not a bad Chief Justice. John Roberts? A really awful Chief Justice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: scottjewell

key words: “in Vermont”


9 posted on 08/26/2012 5:46:42 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

I suspect that if anti discrimination laws were overturned minority owned businesses that discriminate would blossom and thrive far better than white owned racist businesses. The left simply cannot allow the world to see that.

In my personal opinion it would be a good thing because it would be good for the economy. As it is now, its doing more harm than good for minorities.


10 posted on 08/26/2012 5:48:40 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: scottjewell

He doesn’t have the integrity to include the fact that the inn will refrain from this”discriminatory policy” by not hosting any wedding receptions, whether homosexual or heterosexual. Thus a vast majority’s rights to a chosen venue are abrogated. I suppose the same thing will happen when motel swimming pools begin to close down because of inability to afford the chair lift dictated by ADA fiats.


11 posted on 08/26/2012 5:49:00 AM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Actually, I think there were state laws requiring segregation. It was not up to the lunch counter. But, I could be wrong.


12 posted on 08/26/2012 5:49:17 AM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: scottjewell

Another abuse of the courts......If my business is my property, I accept who I wish.


13 posted on 08/26/2012 5:49:28 AM PDT by The Wizard (Madam President is my President now and in the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

Communies and Leftists always see the world as a zero sum game. They steal something from you to give it to someone else. If that can’t do that, then they prevent you from earning what they want to steal. In this case, it’s wedding receptions.


14 posted on 08/26/2012 5:51:04 AM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: VRW Conspirator

Of course.


15 posted on 08/26/2012 5:57:30 AM PDT by scottjewell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

Yes, sadly, it seems long past.


16 posted on 08/26/2012 5:58:40 AM PDT by scottjewell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

“Obviously the owners of the Wildflower Inn don’t have civil rights.”

Perhaps one day all of this will be reversed on that premise.


17 posted on 08/26/2012 6:00:20 AM PDT by scottjewell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WashingtonSource

Of course, there’s another way to skin a cat; the owners could give an interview to a Baptist Sunday school paper declaring that they will continue to contribute to supposedly anti-gay marriage (actually pro-family) charities, then the homosexuals will boycott them.


18 posted on 08/26/2012 6:01:02 AM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Right, yours is the common-sense approach with a respect for liberty - but we both know who will not allow this view to prevail.


19 posted on 08/26/2012 6:02:02 AM PDT by scottjewell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WashingtonSource

“Actually, I think there were state laws requiring segregation. It was not up to the lunch counter. But, I could be wrong.”

You are absolutely correct. The laws mandated segregation in virtually all spheres of public life. So now we have gone to the other extreme.


20 posted on 08/26/2012 6:05:15 AM PDT by scottjewell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson