Posted on 09/29/2012 7:26:06 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
The awful truth is starting to slowly dawn on the DUmmies... Their heroine, Cherokee Princess Fauxcahontas aka Elizabeth Warren, does NOT have a license to practice law in the state of Massachusetts. At first the DUmmies were in a denial mode but were finally forced to switch to a new argument...that she didn't need a law license to represent clients in the Supreme Court. Unfortunately for the DUmmie Deniers, she also represented clients in Taxachusetts. And the one who made these revelations (and TRULY deserves a Pulitzer prize) is William Jacobson of Legal Insurrection who made the initial revelation a few days ago in this post, Elizabeth Warren’s law license problem. And the problem is that Warren does NOT have a Taxachusetts law license. After that revelation, the Warren defenders, including the DUmmies, switched tactics to claim that Warren didn't need a law license to represent clients before the U.S. Supreme court. Unfortunately for that argument, Professor Jacobson also discovered this, Elizabeth Warren 2002 – Working on at least 10 private legal matters. After Professor Jacobson's revelations, even one of Warren's supporters was forced to change his mind: Elizabeth Warren defender: “With this bombshell, I would no longer view the case against her as weak.”
Of course, the DUmmies went all in on defending Warren in this THREAD, "Elizabeth Warren practiced law without a license?" Their firm denial mode began last Monday but they got progressively more nervous about this scandal as the week progressed. Apparently they just can't face the fact that their heroine is a FRAUD who ILLEGALLY practiced law without a license. This has to be incredibly DEMORALIZING for the left since they have been much more enthusiastic by the socialist Fauxcahontas than any other candidate. The revelations are so painful that so far the KOmmies haven't even been able to address it but, when their mental meltdown over this issue arrives, I will be sure to post it for your comedic entertainment. So let us now watch the DUmmies attempt the hopeless task of defending Elizabeth Warren for practicing law without a license in Bolshevik Red while the commentary of your humble correspondent, urging everybody to add the incredible Legal Insurrection blog to your Web feeds, is in the [brackets]:
Elizabeth Warren practiced law without a license?
[Asked the shaken DUmmie.]
Please tell me this is not true. Only sources I could find were Freep and Breitbart, and I'm not inclined to believe either one.
[It's not true, shuggums. Of course I am just LYING to make you feel better so you can sleep peacefully before awakening to the brutal reality that your favorite candidate DESTROYED herself in this election by practicing law without a license.]
Does someone have the full context from what she said on the radio?
[Princess Fauxcahontas admitted NO law license on the RADIO.]
Until it comes from a real source then I'll wait to read about it.
[Where would you like your OSS L-pill delivered?]
I don't understand why some people here think that its harmful for us to see what the other side is claiming and try to develop appropriate responses.
[The proper response is to go into permanent hibernation since the Fall of Fauxcahontas will be much too painful for you to bear.]
Sounds like the right-wing smear machine kicking into full after last week's debate. I don't know what the truth of the matter is (nor have I heard anything about this at all, actually) but I can't imagine a bright woman like Warren doing this.
[Yes, Princess Fauxcahontas is much to brilliant to be practicing law without a license...except she was. Oh, and would you like me to send you a coupon for a steep discount on an OSS L-pill?]
I can't say whether or not there was paperwork she should have filed but didn't, and maybe I watch too many lawyer shows on TV, but I'm skeptical that this was really a proble and no opposing counsel ever mentioned it.
[The paperwork she should have filed is known as the bar exam.]
Legal Insurrection claims they asked they asked MA authorities if she was licensed to practice law, and that they were told NO. Let's just hope she answers quickly and decisively.
[Good news! Your OSS L-pill has been shipped out via Priority Mail!]
We need to monitor how this is playing out amongst the public.
[Don't worry. The public will be very supportive of a high-priced Harvard prof practicing law without a license...NOT!]
I can't imagine she'd have gotten this far in her campaign if she'd broken the law by practicing law without a license.
[Liberals can get away with almost anything in the People's Republic of Taxachusetts.]
I figured it was Breitbart just making shit up again--just wanted to be sure.
[Good news! OSS L-pills now come in pink and pretty colors.]
Is it legal in MA to practice law without being a member of the MA bar? That simple yes or no question seems to be what will bring this nonsense to an end.
[Oh, sure. Any crackpot can set up a law practice in MA sans law license. No problemo.]
As you do, there are times when I like the idea of questions which require simple yes-or-no answers.
[Yes, your OSS L-pill is in the mail. No, you won't like the ugly outcome of this scandal.]
Elizabeth Warren needs to get ahead of this before it becomes a fact
[How? By going back a few years in a Time Machine and take the MA bar exam?]
Right Wing Noise Machine. The tightie righties are burning up the twittershpere with this bogus story trying to get traction with it. There needs to be a pithy response from a top-tweeter that we can re-tweet to take the wind out of their sails.
[How about this pithy response? "NAH! NAH! NAH! HANDS OVER EYES AND EARS! PAY NO ATTENTION TO THE BRUTAL REALITY OF NO FAUXCAHONTAS LAW LICENSE! NAH! NAH! NAH!]
I want to know if Mitt took the bar?
[Probably not since he is NOT a lawyer. Come to think of it he doesn't even hang out at bars but that's another story.]
Does Warren have the documentation she needs to refute the charge?
[More importantly, do you have the invoice for your OSS L-pill?]
Article in business week. Warren has liscence
[Correct. She does have a "liscence" but is still missing a license.]
I don't know anything about the law. If this means anything, the media will cover it. If and when they do, I guess we'll see if it has any effect on the race. My gut tells me it's nothing.
[Nothing but an OSS L-pill sitting in your gut.]
I thought that was excellent -- until I got to the "game-changer" update today. What did you think about that?
[This was posted on Thursday when doubts started to arise among the former skeptics as Professor Jacobson posted.]
I just saw that game-changer update. I don't know what to think. I guess we'll have to see what the legal minds have to say.
[News Flash! Knowing what to think would be a new experience for you.]
Could this have any traction?
[Yes, but don't slip on your OSS L-pill or you could hurt yourself.]
Is the Massachusetts bar taking action? If not, then this story goes nowhere.
[The final words from this DUmmie before he pops his OSS L-pill.]
PING!
Top Five? Wheeeeeee
Thanks for posting. I really hope this humorless scold loses.
I must be the dummy: what’s an OSS L-pill?
5
almost
Fake squaw. Fake lawyer Top 10!
Top 10?
What’s an OSS L-pill?
.
Mitt Romney did take and pass the bar exam
- Right after he graduated with both an MBA and a Law Degree after studying for both at the same time
What a dummie Mitt is!
I’ll bet Mitt will even release his grades and his documentation!
.
But Obama scored a huge two (2) points in the Hawaiian Boys HS Championship game (Coach put him in when they were over 30 points ahead) - Obama scored less that forty-eight (48) total points in his HS basketball “career” as he was just a whiny bench sitter his teammates laughed at!
Sarah Palin only scored the winning foul shot in the Alaskan Girls HS Championship game.....
.
It will cure your headache and life itself very permanently.
Everything about this woman is a fraud..
Okay. I stand corrected. Mitt Romney was admitted to the bar...just not the one that serves liquor.
Sounds like grounds for fines and potentially a civil suit. Certainly Harvard wouldn’t want to keep an attorney practicing law without a license on their staff.
If this means anything, the media will cover it up, since she has a (d) behind her name.
This woman is not playing with all 52 cards in the deck. Look at those eyes.
Ah! Yes. Now it makes great sense! :-)
Princess Liealatta has a free pass no matter what is uncovered in her past, present, or the future.. How really unfair this whole episode has become, not only for the election, but for the future of our Country..
The people these Liberals are foisting upon us are dangerously flawed, and they pose a real and present danger to their own offspring..
If we promise to pay for their texting and paid porno on their Obama phones could they be bought off.. I already know the answer to that stupid question.. WE are already paying for all of that, and a whole lot more.. UGH!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.