Skip to comments.Hindu Women in India Found Raped and Chopped Into Pieces by Muslims
Posted on 09/29/2012 11:11:23 AM PDT by Texas Fossil
The effects of Islam are deadly. Numerous Hindu Women in India are Being Found: Raped, Mutilated and Decapitated
The jihad against the Hindu is centuries old, with over 80 million Hindu slaughtered and thats a low estimate. The jihadi war continues to this day. The ongoing gruesome slaughter of Hindu by Muslims is scrubbed entirely from the news coverage in the West.
Here are some recent news-links (below) that would explain the recent riots in Assam state (India), where indigenous Bodo Hindus and many of the four million illegal Muslim infiltrators (from neighboring Bangladesh) fought pitched battles starting from July 19, 2012 for the next two weeks.
(Excerpt) Read more at shariaunveiled.wordpress.com ...
But the acts must be acknowledged for what they are.
The effects of Sharia and Islamists.
Must’ve seen Saw V. Damned movies.
"If there are two things that characterize Islamic culture, they are terrorism and inbreeding. The latest research shows that these two things might be closely connected . . . First cousin marriages have been the tradition in many Muslim families for innumerable generations. Such marriages increase the risk of negative mental and physical consequences . . . Risk of mental retardation increases with 400 percent (Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 1978 Effect of inbreeding on IQ and mental retardation). Research shows that the IQ is 10-16 points lower in children born from blood related parents and that abilities related to social behavior and empathy develops slower in inbred babies (Indian National Science Academy, 1983 Consanguinity Effects on Intelligence Quotient and Neonatal Behaviours of nsari Muslim Children [pdf]). Such facts might make several pieces fall into place for many people . . . People with low intelligence (because of inbreeding) might also be easier to brainwash with fundamentalist Islam. "
From Internet sources. My emphasis.
Shame and damnation be upon the Islamists.
Millions of Muslims in Turkey have taken to the streets to oppose the sharia law and Islamism of the ruling AK Party.. AND EXCEPT FOR A FEW MUSLIMS HERE.. NOT ONE PEEP OF CONDEMNATION OF ISLAMISM BY MUSLIMS LIVING HERE. (Those phony CAIR "we condemn all terror" just won't cut it.)
Gives new meaning to Islam as the “Religion of Piece”.
Coming to a city near you ...
Given the strong, historical Islamic penchant for necrophilia
Not saying this doesn't exist. However, I've never seen such a claim made before and would like to see evidence.
If the Muslims do not rein in their crazies, or the world will rein them in.
The world will take a chainsaw when only a knife is needed.
Good Muslim’s! Fix your problems. I fear for your future if you spend one more day in denial.
Eventually they'll be kicked out one way or the other ~ and whatever protections they thought they had will be set aside like yesterday's garbage.
There is a very small percentage worldwide of “good Muslims” They are a minority and are considered apostates by the others. A larger minority will gladly chop people up and blow themselves up for Allah. The majority will stand around and not say anything while atrocities occur, because they know that this is what the prophet commands. Islam is a fascist ideology.
“There is a very small percentage worldwide of good Muslims”
Then let us give them the month of October to clean it up.
If not, game on.
I don’t let roaches or fleas live in my house, fix it, or we will.
Islamic ‘Death-Sex’ in Context
> The effects of Sharia and Islamists.
Coming soon to America, thanks to Barack Hussein Obama. (Correction: Already here.)
Islamic Death-Sex in Context
It appears to be scrubbed from here:
Necrophilia Permitted in Islam
Viewer’s complaint to youtube??
"The Muslims started the riots; the Hindu gave a fitting response."
What was the response?
I don’t know.
Regardless, this is not a human response.
It is time to rid the world of this pestilence.
it took less time to do a yahoo search and find answer, then to type your message doubting the practice...
World Muslim Congress: Farewell Sex with Dead Wife ...
... just like sex with dead wife ... Islam, Muslims and Same Sex Marriages; Haj Subsidy in India abolished, Muslims welcome it... Farewell Sex with Dead Wife ...
worldmuslimcongress.blogspot.com/...sex-with-dead-wife... - Cached
having sex with dead wife is allowed in islam ( necrophilia ...
By Abeer Tayel Al Arabiya Egypt’s National Council for Women (NCW) has appealed to the Islamist-dominated parliament not to approve two controversial laws ...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7z5M4QTINY - Cached.Play Video.
Video: having sex with dead wife is allowed in islam ...
Egypt’s National Council for Women (NCW) has appealed to the Islamist-dominated parliament not to approve two controversial laws on the minimum age of marriage and ...
europenews.dk/en/node/56411 - Cached
Fatwa: Necrophilia Is An Acceptable Practice In Islam
Washington / Morocco Board News-—An Imam in Morocco issued a fatwa stating that necrophilia is Halal or religiously acceptable practice in Islam. He said that a ...
www.moroccoboard.com/news/...acceptable-practice-in-islam - Cached
great point about the origins.
Muhammad having sex with a dead woman,
to “help” her.
just as the origins of Muslim laws permitting sex with age 9 girls, began from the example of the “most perfect man”.
...yet many Christian churches, won’t even condemn the evil religion of Satan, and instead promote “Chrislam”.
Currently they are pushing on the Europeans for privilege ~ wrong place to be doing that.
i wish you were correct.
but, the rape epidemic in Europe, going on for years,
indicates the opposite. it will become Eurabia.
in Olso, almost all the rapes are by muslims.
the offspring of Vikings do nothing, while their woman are raped.
in France, they solved the muslim rapist problem...
by passing a law preventing any rape statistics by ethnic group or religion.
I am overcome with great sadness learning about this and related subjects.
No one who does such things can remotely be called “human”. They are Evil Vermin. Only a servant of the “father-of-Lies” could commit such acts.
Eventually they select leaders from the war party and then the newcomers are exterminated. That’s the European way ~ for thousands of years.
In the Bible, Nahor (brother of Abram) marries his own niece, and Isaac marries Rebekah who is his first cousin once removed, then Jacob marries Leah and Rachel who are both his first cousins (daughters of Laban, the brother of Rebekah).
First cousin marriages were found in European royal families but not with good results--Mary Tudor married her first cousin (Philip II) but they did not produce any children; Mary II married her first cousin William III and they also had no children. Inbreeding seems have destroyed the Spanish Habsburgs.
OK. Did a little research.
This whole thing was widely reported, based on reports of a law being passed, or possibly just introduced, in the Egyptian parliament.
Unfortunately, it appears this was merely a rumor, or at least I’ve been unable to locate any confirmation such a law or bill ever existed.
There is also a weirdo Moroccan imam who made such a claim about a year ago. Has received, AFAIK, no support from anybody else. It should be pointed out that in (Sunni) Islam there is no official body that “ordains” or can defrock an imam. Essentially any male Muslim can claim he is an imam. IOW, this guy may very well be the Muslim equivalent of Jim Jones or the Westboro Baptist Church.
There exists a hadith with somewhat obscure possible references to Mo having sex with a dead woman. It is by no means explicit on the point, particularly since it must be translated. It should also be pointed out that hadiths are the least authoritative of the three Muslim written “scriptures.” I could not find a single Muslim source, with probable exception of the nut in Morocco, that used this story to justify necrophilia. Just anti-Muslim sources using it in the AHA! fashion.
BTW, the second of your references points to a refutation of this claim.
Finally, the question I asked was about a “strong, historical Islamic penchant for necrophilia.” If this is to be literally true, there must be an explicit record of such a penchant going back many centuries. Not a record extending back no more than a year, and possibly just a couple of months, with even that strongly contradicted.
Look, I’m perfectly willing to believe the worst of Islam. I just would like that worst to actually be true.
I guess too many Americans are emotionally involved to see the remarkable similarity of such rumors to those common in the 19th and early 20th centuries about the perverse practices of the Catholic Church, particularly in convents, and of similar rumors about Mormon practices in their Temples. Or for that matter to rumors about Jewish “blood sacrifice,” or similar Roman rumors about early Christians. Or the “Satanist” day care centers of the 1980s, which AFAIK have all been proven to be hoaxes.
Although, come to think of it, recent revelations about the practices of Catholic clergy have been pretty appalling.
There is a long-established doctrine that “extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.” I have seen no evidence yet that necrophilia is widely practiced or approved in Islam, either recently or historically. Which was what I questioned.
There is, OTOH, a long history of very well-documented Muslim beliefs with regard to sex that we would considerably extremely odd and perverse. Although necrophilia is not among them.
For your reading pleasure, here is the great Mark Steyn’s response to a critic who made the extremely unwise choice of challenging Mark to a war of words and wit.
Not saying this doesn’t exist. However, I’ve never seen such a claim made before and would like to see evidence.
Wouldn’t the recent ruling that necrophilia was OK for 6 hours after death cover this nicely. http://www.moroccoboard.com/news/5238
Unfortunately, it appears this was merely a rumor, or at least Ive been unable to locate any confirmation such a law or bill ever existed.
Barely literate IMAM giving laws to illiterate peasants .. why would you think you could find anything written? The law is whatever they say it is ,, and it has been said ...
This is not an authoritative “ruling” in the sense we use this word in the West, a proclamation by an official board or body.
It is, as far as I can tell, the opinion of a single nutjob in Morocco.
It is, IOW, the rough equivalent of a blog post by some guy in his basement. I have yet to see any support whatsoever from other Muslims for this opinion. Which would seem to be instant and widespread if it were a practice for which Islam does indeed have a “strong, historical penchant.”
Can you read?
I was referring to claims this was a bill introduced, or possibly passed, in the Egyptian Parliament. This does not appear to be a true claim.
There are somewhere around 1B Muslims, yet a claim by a single Moroccan weirdo is now automatically classified as “official Muslim doctrine” that must not be questioned by anyone?
googling, first cousin marriages in islam
returns quite a number of hits. Yes, one has to have the usual amount of skepticism; but it appeared to me that the quote I posted above is correct.
The author of the quote is Danish psychologist Nicolai Sennels and his articles and others are laboriously sourced.
Independent of that here is www.consang.net and a chart from there; to wit, "Globally, the most common form of consanguineous union contracted is between first cousins"
Global prevalence of consanguinity
Coincidence? I don't think so.
(Sources of the images are in the links.)
The text is here
Not surprising that there is nothing there that states explicitly that Islamists blah, blah. There is this sole reference (that I could find) "double first cousin marriages, which have the same coefficient of inbreeding [as uncle-niece unions] (F = 0.125), are recognized within Islam"
It seems to me that if "Globally, the most common form of consanguineous union contracted is between first cousins" and the chart shows the Arab countries with the preponderance of consanguineous marriages then that lends a great deal of authority to other 'Net sources that state it outright: "First cousin marriages have been the tradition in many Muslim families for innumerable generations."
Thanks for asking.. I love to post that chart. I hope the owners don't mind and are indeed pleased for the additional publicity.
muzzies have killed over 60 million indians since they first moved into the subcontinent. perhaps it is time the hindus respond in kind.
islam delenda est.
Ancient Greece and ancient Israel, and probably other societies, had rules about heiresses marrying a close relative to keep the family going--which could result in marriages that were between such close relatives that they would be illegal in the US (uncle & niece in Greece).
The southern (Dravidian) parts of India have a higher rate than the northern (Indo-European) parts so it may depend on other things than religion.
At what point does it become "safe"? Are second cousins more likely to pass on harmful traits to offspring than completely unrelated parents would be? Or third cousins? In much of human history most people have lived in small villages so a lot of marriages must have occurred between people with some kind of kinship ties. Agreed that first cousin marriages are a bad idea. "Double first cousin" marriages may be even worse (when the first cousins are related on both sides).
Natives of India do not tend to being politically correct, in spite of the stiff-upper-lip Brit influence. And they can be as merciless as the koranimals, specially defending their own turf.
Why this problem drags on for them is perplexing. That's why Pakistan was created, to rid India of all traces of koranimals.
I wonder what went wrong the last 50 years or so?
By all rights, muslims in India should be justifiably terrorized.
Oil went wrong. India has to import 3 million barrels/day. If they open a can of whup ass on their internal Muslims, not only do they get UN sanctions, but all the Muslim oil countries stage an embargo.
Liberal secular societies are fertile grounds for violent ideologies like Islam to flourish. America is not too far behind.
I was referring to claims this was a bill introduced, or possibly passed, in the Egyptian Parliament
Sharia law is now the law of Egypt as it is in Iran ... What makes you think that the parliament is superior to or different from the theocracy.
Thanks you sir.
Found the article via Twitter.
I am glad you are a FR user.
Hindu Women in India Found Raped and Chopped Into Pieces by Muslims
Coming to America SOON if not already here.
I think everytime somebody pronounces judgement on a topic out of ignorance, and it’s instantly obvious that they never bothered to google the facts for themselves, they should have to pay $10 to the person who had to google it for them.
Now, does this mean I think all or many Muslims approve of necrophilia or other perverse practices? No, of course not. Zamzami himself, in the clip above, is clearly disgusted.
But the religion does, because Allah himself in the Quran (33:21) endorses Muhammads life as a beautiful pattern of conduct, an example for all mankind for all time. And to the literalist believer who wishes to recreate the true Islam of the 7th century, that may well include (among other things) child marriage, pedophilia, and, yes, marital necrophilia.
I think you can see why Islams apologists would rather we not know of these things.
I am not from MO, but show me where it is debunked by a reasonable authority as being non-existent.
The Sexual Pathology of the Libyan Attackers
This is current reporting of such sick behaviour.
Admitted it is by al-Qaeda .
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.