Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TIME TO FIRE THE LOSING COACHES
Mr K | Mr. K

Posted on 11/08/2012 5:44:53 AM PST by Mr. K

This is the time of year when all the talk on the radio is about which coaches with losing records will be fired.

"Reince" Prebus should be first


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: Mr. K
I did a piece on Preibus yesterday ~ several points are worth considering here.

(1) The party fired Mike Steele even though he'd presided over the greatest electoral win in 70 years (in 2010).

(2) Preibus, whatever he did, and he did some damaging things to several candidates down ticket, also presided over the Romney debacle.

(3) Ordinarily even those who only preside are rewarded when the party wins. Imagine what we should do with those who presided over a loss.

That's what we have to do with Preibus ~ if only to encourage future RNC Chairmen to get their act together.

Now, who else needs dumped? Well, we could start with every single individual there at the RNC who voted for Preibus. Their state committees should be encouraged to dump them out of Republican politics! That way we solve the Preibus problem root and branch.

I'd dump Gillespie as well. He contributes nothing to victory.

21 posted on 11/08/2012 6:19:26 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Belteshazzar

Newt Gingrich should be the next GOP party leader after Prebus is SUMMARILY FIRED THEN SHOT THEN P!SSED ON


22 posted on 11/08/2012 6:19:44 AM PST by Mr. K (We need a TEA PARTY MARCH ON GOP HEADQUARTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

Really, “Conservatives” stayed home ? So that means you stayed home. Great . Thanks.


23 posted on 11/08/2012 6:21:58 AM PST by Bainbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mr Fuji
You may be right, most Conservatives claim they are reacting intellectually to events but when you get down to their reasoning it more often than not is simply emotion just like the folks on the left.

But personally I cant stand it, drives me up the wall, I'm a big boy I can handle the truth...

24 posted on 11/08/2012 6:22:25 AM PST by montanajoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
Every 20 years the first serious election after a redistricting will be the presidential election.

About 40% more people show up for this type of election as compared to a mid-term congressional election.

Redistricting frequently involves consolidating some polling places and creating new ones in other locations.

That's why so many voters are surprised when they show up to vote and there's this huge crowd.

The folks who show up at nearly empty polling spots that'd usually been overcrowded are only pleasantly surprised.

Being pleasantly surprised is not news. You didn't hear about that.

25 posted on 11/08/2012 6:25:20 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GerardKempf
BTW, Mourdock was billed as a Fiscal Conservative, and he is. He is also a Social Conservative.

His predecessor, Lugar, would have continued to be the senior ranking Republican in the Senate, and with a Republican majority he'd been naming committee chairmen.

With Lugar out, Orin Hatch, the senior senator from Utah would have been the senior Republican senator in a Republican organized senate.

Outside interests came to Indiana with the money to finance Mourdock's primary race. Did they stick around to finance Mourdock's campaign in the general election, or were they just happy enough to put their boy Hatch in the catbird's seat?

Well, that was a big risk wasn't it ~ and the risk takers lost, but so did Mourdock, and the entire Republic will probably go down the drain simply because "they" wanted Hatch to be the senior senator with all the power that goes with that exalted position ~

Frankly I didn't support Lugar because he's clearly become a drooler ~ and the Senate is oversubscribed to that custom.

26 posted on 11/08/2012 6:33:49 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Akins and Murdoch’s problems were not that they were social conservatives. Their problems were their tongues flapping without engaging their brains. They made totally unpalatable statements that became huge soundbites for their opposition.

It doesn’t take a great brain to say simply “my religion leads me to respect all life as sacred until we have these issues decided by elected legislatures and not by unelected judges. I’m a great believer in “due process of law.”


27 posted on 11/08/2012 6:35:30 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

The coach doesn’t make the plays or the fumbles. It’s the players..................


28 posted on 11/08/2012 6:39:57 AM PST by Red Badger (Lincoln freed the slaves. Obama just got them ALL back......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bainbridge

I voted for Cruz and Goode. But I know plenty of other conservatives who stayed home rather than vote for Romney. It didn’t cost him here in Texas, but it did in other places of the country.


29 posted on 11/08/2012 6:42:02 AM PST by JCBreckenridge (Texas, Texas, Whisky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
They knew they were able to manufacuter votes at-will ...

That's why I say electronic voting machines should be outlawed in ALL elections..................

30 posted on 11/08/2012 6:42:07 AM PST by Red Badger (Lincoln freed the slaves. Obama just got them ALL back......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: xzins

When the RNC announced they were cutting off Akin and Mourdock and Akin and Mourdock only - that was a disaster. They cut their own throats. The result - lowered turnout.

Had the RNC stood behind their nominees and did their job - the Republican party would have won this election.


31 posted on 11/08/2012 6:44:51 AM PST by JCBreckenridge (Texas, Texas, Whisky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

Akin and Murdock aren’t the first ever candidates ever to say something stupid or misspeak during a campaign. They won’t be the last. Cutting off your own candidate is a self-defeating strategy. Best just to have the guy apologize for not saying what he really meant.

Joe Biden said there’s not one day he’s been proud to be the running mate of Obama. Shouldn’t he be allowed to correct that to what he really meant?


32 posted on 11/08/2012 6:55:53 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I’m sure Joe was telling the truth.


33 posted on 11/08/2012 7:00:03 AM PST by JCBreckenridge (Texas, Texas, Whisky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

I could help but wonder. :>)


34 posted on 11/08/2012 7:02:59 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

I couldn’t help but wonder. :>)


35 posted on 11/08/2012 7:03:10 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

I couldn’t help but wonder. :>)


36 posted on 11/08/2012 7:03:16 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

“No one who is identified primarily as a social conservative can win a statewide race anywhere in the United States.”

The only success of the night was by a bold social conservative tea-partier. Ted Cruz proves you wrong.


37 posted on 11/08/2012 7:03:21 AM PST by JCBreckenridge (Texas, Texas, Whisky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

Oh,You voted for Goode. Great. Thanks.


38 posted on 11/08/2012 7:11:40 AM PST by Bainbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson