Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will Alabama Supreme Court Rule Obama Ineligible?
Godfather Politics ^ | December 11, 2012 | Giacomo

Posted on 12/11/2012 1:37:12 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Over the past year, both before and since the elections, there have been a number of court cases challenging Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility. Most of the cases have been dismissed by judges for reasons that are not truly legitimate, but many feel they were dismissed to avoid the political ramifications.

Just last week I wrote about a case that was filed in Florida, that not only challenged Obama’s eligibility, but stated that he was a direct threat to the safety and security of the United States. That case has yet to be heard.

Yet another case filed in Alabama may present one of the best chances of producing a ruling against Obama. In this case, Hugh McInnish and others have filed suit against Alabama Secretary of State Beth Chapman for failure to properly verify the eligibility of Barack Obama. The case points out that the state constitution requires the Secretary of State to verify a candidate’s eligibility and that Chapman failed to accurately verify Obama’s eligibility.

The attorney handling this case is the same attorney handling the case in Florida. Larry Klayman, founder of Judicial Watch and the Klayman Law Firm in Washington, will hopefully be arguing this case before the Alabama State Supreme Court. The reason the case is going to the state Supreme Court is that a previous judge dismissed the case. In that case the state argued...

(Excerpt) Read more at godfatherpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: alabama; birthcertificate; certifigate; florida; naturalborncitizen; obama; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 12/11/2012 1:37:22 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Given that Larry (Loser) Klayman is in charge, the answer is obviously a resounding “no”.


2 posted on 12/11/2012 1:43:42 PM PST by Notary Sojac (Only liberals believe that people can be made virtuous via legislative enactment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Nope, won’t happen.

Corruption is too deep now - everywhere.

Nothing to see here.

Move along.

Move along.


3 posted on 12/11/2012 1:44:57 PM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

obviously not.


4 posted on 12/11/2012 1:44:57 PM PST by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

who knows? one of these days some judge somewhere just might decide to do his/her job?


5 posted on 12/11/2012 1:45:07 PM PST by faithhopecharity (--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It’s too late...and it’s not going to do any good. I think anyone can “prove” he was born here better than anyone can prove he was born in Kenya. Not that I like the man’s policies and havn’t looked into this issue (like many others) i just think it makes people who live believing it look like kooks.

If there was real factual hard evidence I would jump on the band-wagon right away.


6 posted on 12/11/2012 1:46:51 PM PST by the_boy_who_got_lost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If Obama is ineligible, he should not be POTUS. People like he and Hillary are enemies of America.


7 posted on 12/11/2012 1:49:59 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Betteridge's law of headlines

"Any headline which ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no"
8 posted on 12/11/2012 1:50:33 PM PST by FewsOrange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

Obama and his minions would just laugh it off ,then ignore it


9 posted on 12/11/2012 2:00:08 PM PST by molson209
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So if the case is won and the Alabama Sec. of State did not infact confirm his eligibility, does that them mean that Obama will lose the Electoral votes from Alabama, the one’s that he did not get?


10 posted on 12/11/2012 2:05:16 PM PST by Michael.SF. (Obama lied, Stevens died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity; 2ndDivisionVet; freekitty

No judge can, or will boot a sitting President from office.

That is a good thing.


11 posted on 12/11/2012 2:08:24 PM PST by Jacquerie ("How few were left who had seen the republic!" - Tacitus, The Annals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity

No judge will boot a sitting President from office.

That is a bad thing.


12 posted on 12/11/2012 2:10:15 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Well, then, it looks like another failure then. Specifically, the term “properly”? Did the SoS follow the law, custom, and procedure for certifying those, and I mean ALL of those on the ballot? Unless you can demonstrate the SoS SPECIFICALLY violated the procedure, then it is all for naught, and will be tossed out, like the lower court did.

EVIDENCE, people. Not wishful thinking.


13 posted on 12/11/2012 2:11:29 PM PST by ace2u_in_MD (You missed something...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“There is credible evidence that Mr. Obama was not born within the United States and that his birth certificate or other identifying documents are fraudulent.”

- Larry Klayman

Subpoena his complete immigration file with DHS. A Certificate of Naturalization is proof he was a foreign national before becoming a U.S. Citizen. A Permanent Resident Alien Registration (Green Card) is proof he is a foreign national who is not yet a U.S. citizen.


14 posted on 12/11/2012 2:11:38 PM PST by SvenMagnussen (TINKER, TAILOR, SOLDIER, SPY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

Ok, faithhopecharity, tell me how, under the law, can a judge remove a sitting president?

That is for congress to do...


15 posted on 12/11/2012 2:14:30 PM PST by ace2u_in_MD (You missed something...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: the_boy_who_got_lost

We don’t have to prove where he was born. Obozo has to prove he is constitutionally eligible - i.e. that he is a natural born citizen, one that was born on US soil to 2 USA citizen parentS.

When you apply for a job or whatever, you have to prove your place of birth, not the employer or the agency.

obozo has never proven his birth status. No one ever knows where the heck he was really born. We only know that he claims to be the son of a foreigner.

You are saying - we the employer asking obozo to prove his birth status to make sure he is eligible for the job are kooks;
but the idiots who DON’T question his birth status but blindly let him take the job are right in calling us kooks?

IT IS OBVIOUS - YOU ARE THE KOOK!


16 posted on 12/11/2012 2:14:37 PM PST by chrisnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

spread around a few bribes and these guys will be bought.


17 posted on 12/11/2012 2:24:21 PM PST by Joe Boucher ((FUBO))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Judge could demand proof of constitutional eligibility, especially easy before a new presidential term begins (dores not require removing a sitting “president” at this propitious time)


18 posted on 12/11/2012 2:24:33 PM PST by faithhopecharity (--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FewsOrange

I agree.


19 posted on 12/11/2012 2:30:42 PM PST by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ace2u_in_MD

1. The state constitution requires the Secretary of State to verify a candidate’s eligibility.
2. The plaintiff has presented the state SOS mountains of evidences that obozo is not constitutionally eligible to be the pres, and asks the state SOS to verify obozo’s elig.
3. The state SOS ignored the evidences and did not do anything to verify obozo’s eligibility, thus violating the state constitution.
ISN’T THIS SPECIFIC ENOUGH??!

IT IS THE CONSTITUTION, STUPID. (I don’t mean you specifically, I mean all the idiots who ignore the constitution)
This is not a matter of ‘procedure’, but constitution!


20 posted on 12/11/2012 2:35:10 PM PST by chrisnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson