Skip to comments.Emergency Motion Filed: National Archives Caught Altering Hawaii Arrival Records For 1961
Posted on 12/20/2012 11:19:16 PM PST by Seizethecarp
Sibley had subpoena from the National Archives the Arrival Records for August 1 through August 10, 1961, of all passengers arriving in Honolulu, Hawaii to see if records existed that Obama and his mother arrived in Hawaii during that time frame. What NARA produced were two microfilm spools of the arrival records for July 28 through August 1, 1961 and August 8 through August 12, 1961. As detailed in the Emergency Motion, the original date on the box of August 7 has been altered by white-out and a new date of August 1 had been written on the box. Proof of that alteration comes from a photograph of the same box taken nine months earlier which reveals the date was originally August 7. Proof of that alteration comes from a photograph of the same box taken nine months earlier which reveals the date was originally August 7. Thus, indisputably the box has been tampered with a criminal offense to hide the fact that the microfilm for the August 2 through August 7, 1961 arrivals is now missing.
(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...
“Immigration records missing for week of Obama’s birth”
After months of searching, investigators commissioned by Maricopa County, Ariz., Sheriff Joe Arpaio to examine Barack Obamas eligibility for office found Immigration and Naturalization Service travel records for foreign flights into Hawaii in 1961, only to discover that records for the week of Obamas birth were missing.
Specifically, in Record Group A 3573, data records for Aug. 2, 1961 through Aug. 7, 1961, appear to be completely missing, as if the records were removed from the database prior to the microfilm recording.
Exhibit A shows NARA Record Group A3573, Reel 184, for INS passenger records on foreign flights into Honolulu from July 28, 1961 through Aug. 7, 1961.
Remarkably, all INS records for the week of Obamas birth, Aug. 1 through Aug. 7, 1961, were missing from the end of Reel 184 and were not discovered anywhere on Reel 185 or any other microfilm reel in the record group.
Hmmm...maybe this was just a clerk correcting the label to reflect the missing records after Corsi made a stink? Hard to say. Seems a little weak for the judge to bite, but worth a try. The records are missing on the key dates!
He’s using the birth certificate issued to Virginia Sunahara, and her birth date as well.. Who the hell knows when 0bama’s REAL birth date is.. I wish Congress would DEMAND that Hawaii furnish his ORIGINAL birth records.
Very interesting. Thanks.
Indonesian Go Home!
They unnecessarily tampered with the comma, too.
And they wrote over the last "T" in "AUGUST."
(They really bore down hard on that pen, didn't they? I see a lot of anger in that ballpoint pen stroke.)
I’m sure Holder’s corrupt FBI will get right on this.
Nothing's changed. He's still illegal.
This sure will make it hard for obama to get elected again.
and a very sloppy job at it as well.....
He’s not planning on any more elections.
White-out was used, and excessive brush strokes are hard to write over. So she could have given birth in Kenya, like Obama's grandmother said, and flown to Hawaii to improperly register the birth!
Is this diversionary tactics ? They do need some right now. And thus the sloppiness of it all.
Because we all know SAD wasnt the mother - - - Follow that lead - - -
Moreso, to find out WHO he is!
Was “White-Out” available in 1961?
Having never had a baby myself, I don't know what condition the mother would be in
Razor blades were used to carefully scratch out old writing and write over. Surface of paper becomes a bit coarse vs. the rest around the scratch. Ink of correction gets a bit rough on edges.
>>Is it reasonable to expect a mother in Indonesia to give birth on one day then make a lenghty airline trip to Hawaii within three days of that birth?>>
Yes, if you want your baby to be considered an American with all of its advantages for the child and yourself.
What would the rush be, couldn’t you wait at least a week before you felt better?
Unless there were complications, it wouldn't be unduly hard on her. Plus, what's to say the day of birth is correct - might have given birth a week or so earlier than what is "officially" stated and had more time to recuperate.
Nation Archives has absolutely no interest
in the integrity of their records.
Their goal is to defend the DNC above all else;
America? not so much.
And we still have PhonyCon RINOS attacking those who are investigating Obama....
Who took those records? Looks like Hannity Amnesty, Lah-vin, Coulter,Malkin, OReilly, et al.....will remain Obama Supporters..
What would the rush be, couldnt you wait at least a week before you felt better?
Since we don’t know the actual birth date perhaps she did wait a week or two.. What we do know is that all records shown are suspect, altered or undisclosed/hidden.
I first brought up the microfilm copies of the birth records being one nearly unalterable record that needed to be checked almost 4 years ago... I still haven’t heard of anyone being allowed to view that reel...
This (arrival records) COULD be a distraction... If I was Obama I’d be planting red herrings everywhere.
“maybe this was just a clerk correcting the label to reflect the missing records after Corsi made a stink?”
When an error is made on official document? A bank will ask for (and expect), an initial, by the person changing the document. Why would a change to official records not show the bureaucrat’s initial and a note defining the reason for the change? Know what I mean?
I undderstand your caution. I too noticed the obviousness of the correction and wondered how Corsi concluded cover-up.
“Having never had a baby myself, I don’t know what condition the mother would be in”
Here is one bit of information.
In 1961 the average length of stay in a hospital for maternity stays was 8 days. And that is a US average.
Drive through birthings were not yet in practice at all at that time.
“When an error is made on official document?”
The “official document” IMO on reflection, is the microfilm, not the label on the box containing the microfilm.
Corsi went national with his discovery that the microfilm in the box labeled through Aug 7 only went through Aug 1. The microfilm appeared to be CUT to remove the records on the dates when a certain baby might have been recorded entering the country.
Having been apprised by Corsi of the fact that the film in the box only went through Aug 1, a helpful clerk may have corrected the label by hand.
Certainly a properly brought action that would include discovery to investigate what happened to the CUT missing microfilm. I don’t think this legal action focusing on the box label is it. The Obama Admin. is the ultimate custodian of these records and Holder the ultimate prosecutor of any wrongdoing, so without a non-existent independent prosecutor (law has lapsed), not much hope.
In the third world the practice was more like: drop the kid in the field, wrap him up, continue hoeing.
We also know that when she showed up at Susan Blake's in Washington, she didn't know how to change a diaper.
What we do know is that all records shown are suspect, altered or undisclosed/hidden.
And not just his birth records. Who is this guy, really?
“I still havent heard of anyone being allowed to view that reel...”
Corsi viewed the reel at the link up-thread. The end of the reel with the dates from Aug 2 to Aug 7 was missing and appeared to have been cut. The next reel begins Aug 8.
Agree with what probably happened was a clerk changed the label to what was actually viewable on the reel. What should now be done is correct the film itself by going back to photograph the missing pages from the original records. Not that I'm holding my breath that'll ever be done and if it was done that it would be true.
“Is it reasonable to expect a mother in Indonesia to give birth on one day then make a lenghty airline trip to Hawaii within three days of that birth?”
SADO has NO documented connection to Indonesia or Indonesians at that time that I have seen.
SADO DID have a Kenyan husband and there is lots of circumstantial evidence of a Kenyan birth including Corsi’s claimed Kenyan government secret document revealing that birth records are MISSING from Coast Province General Hospital for the period surrounding Barry’s likely birth. The Kenyan gov’t record search was prompted by Bush’s ambassador to Kenya.
Between Feb 2, 1961 HI bigamous marriage vital record date and U of WA transcript confirming her in WA in Sept 1961 (and numerous witnesses saying late Aug 1961) SADO managed to travel thousands of miles across the Pacific ocean with or without baby Barry.
Still open most likely birth locations: Kenya, HI, WA, IMO.
“Was ‘White-Out’ available in 1961?”
Sibley’s before and after photos of the day date change occurred in the past 7 months.
“What should now be done is correct the film itself by going back to photograph the missing pages from the original records.”
Once original paper records are “safely” transferred to microfilm there is often a protocol to destroy the originals...
Butter, Birth announcement ping!
“There is evidence that SAD’s Aunt lived in Blaine WA at that time. Blaine is a small border town across the Canadian border from WhiteRock.”
IIRC, Beckwith agreed to withdraw links to the family in Blaine when a member of the family contacted him and made a credible case that SADO was not there. Was this family member protesting too much?
IIRC, there was no national healthcare in Canada at the time, so that argument was bogus.
Also, IIRC Canada does not have anchor baby citizenship conferred of foreign nationals temporarily domiciled there.
That said, a Canada birth is possible, but I haven’t seen a single verifiable contemporaneous piece of evidence that supports it.
Analysis of the correction fluid could yield clues.. Correction fluid wasn’t widely used until the late ‘60s..
Corsi viewed the reel at the link up-thread.
I was talking of the microfilm of BC’s not arrival records at the ports...
From what I remember of the story it didn’t say she didn’t know how. She probably didn’t want to and was happy that her friend volunteered. My granddaughters who are about the same age she was in 1961 would let someone else do it too especially if it was a dirty one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.