Skip to comments.Affidavit: DHS Special Agent Stephen Coffman; Obama Selective Service Registration Forged
Posted on 01/03/2013 10:49:11 PM PST by Seizethecarp
Affidavit: Retired Resident Agent in Charge/Special Agent from the Department of Homeland Security and Retired Coast Guard Investigative Service Chief Investigator, Jeffery Stephen Coffman:
# 18 from the Affidavit: Based on my observations, research, experience and training, it is my belief that the Selective Service registration card I received under the Freedom Of Information Act request under Barack Obama has been altered.
(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...
Given Orly Taitz’s perpetual incompetence (so far) I don’t hold out much hope that this affidavit in her hands will get much traction, but it might be picked up by another attorney if a legal opening comes up, say in Klayman’s case in FL.
debbie schlussel was all over this before Mike Zullo
There are some high powered people and government agencies involved with creating false documents. They aren't going to stop and Obama’s supporters don't want to know the truth.
Is it wrong? Yes. Will justice be served? Probably not.
When History is written. I would not be surprised that Obama’s mom was a CIA double agent.
Of course it is. Most dogs have better papers than 0bowWow.
It has long been clear to me that nothing about Obama is real. What is really bothers me is that fact that so many people know he is a total fake and do not care. They see through a twisted version of reality. Obama will lead them to a some higher plane of existence. Sadly, all he will do is impoverish all of the us and slowly and systematically destroy our country.
Zipcodes changed often, I suspect that the 96826 might not have been around the time of Mr. Obama's 1980 Selective Service card.
Looking at Mrs.Dunhams passport records, as late as June 1976, her address zip code was 96814, not the 96826 on record for Mr. Obama. It could have easily changed in those 4 years, but it is something to look into.
Just like with the Clintons. The truth about anything was really just a lie that had not yet been uncovered.
Evidence, or outright admission, nothing is going to be done. Who, in Washington DC, will do anything? Nobody.
Obama is not the beginning.....he is the ending. The United States of America was a fine example of a democratic republic but when the Constitution was usurped, it began to crumble and the foundation has been eroded away.
Remember the Afghani warlord asked, “Is there no man left in Washington?” No, sir, there is not.
Obama's Certificate of Loss of Nationality was finalized 6 months after his 18th birthday.
I’m afraid that’s true. It’s not a happy reality but I’d rather face it and accept it than live in the fantasy that so many have chosen to wrap themselves in.
“Zipcodes changed often, I suspect that the 96826 might not have been around the time of Mr. Obama’s 1980 Selective Service card.”
Arpaio’s posse did better than that. Not only did they verify that that zip code was in use, they obtained numerous selective service registrations stamped in the same time frame in 1980 fro the same post office branch!
More than classic. I’d call him the ultimate example. I can think of no other historical instance that is anywhere near as extensive.
The Venus, 12 U.S. 8 Cranch 253 253 (1814)
Vattel, who, though not very full to this point, is more explicit and more satisfactory on it than any other whose work has fallen into my hands, says: The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives or indigenes are those born in the country of parents who are citizens. Society not being able to subsist and to perpetuate itself but by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.
Shanks v. Dupont, 28 U.S. 3 Pet. 242 242 (1830)
Ann Scott was born in South Carolina before the American revolution, and her father adhered to the American cause and remained and was at his death a citizen of South Carolina. There is no dispute that his daughter Ann, at the time of the Revolution and afterwards, remained in South Carolina until December, 1782. Whether she was of age during this time does not appear. If she was, then her birth and residence might be deemed to constitute her by election a citizen of South Carolina. If she was not of age, then she might well be deemed under the circumstances of this case to hold the citizenship of her father, for children born in a country, continuing while under age in the family of the father, partake of his national character as a citizen of that country. Her citizenship, then, being prima facie established, and indeed this is admitted in the pleadings, has it ever been lost, or was it lost before the death of her father, so that the estate in question was, upon the descent cast, incapable of vesting in her? Upon the facts stated, it appears to us that it was not lost and that she was capable of taking it at the time of the descent cast.
Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857)
The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As society cannot perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their parents, and succeed to all their rights.' Again: 'I say, to be of the country, it is necessary to be born of a person who is a citizen; for if he be born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country. . . .
Minor v. Happersett , 88 U.S. 162 (1875)
The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first.
United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)
At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children, born in a country of parents who were its citizens, became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.
Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325 (1939),
Was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that a child born in the United States to naturalized parents on U.S. soil is a natural born citizen and that the child's natural born citizenship is not lost if the child is taken to and raised in the country of the parents' origin, provided that upon attaining the age of majority, the child elects to retain U.S. citizenship "and to return to the United States to assume its duties." Not only did the court rule that she did not lose her native born Citizenship but it upheld the lower courts decision that she is a "natural born Citizen of the United States" because she was born in the USA to two naturalized U.S. Citizens.
But the Secretary of State, according to the allegation of the bill of complaint, had refused to issue a passport to Miss Elg 'solely on the ground that she had lost her native born American citizenship.' The court below, properly recognizing the existence of an actual controversy with the defendants [307 U.S. 325, 350] (Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Haworth, 300 U.S. 227 , 57 S.Ct. 461, 108 A.L.R. 1000), declared Miss Elg 'to be a natural born citizen of the United States' (99 F.2d 414) and we think that the decree should include the Secretary of State as well as the other defendants. The decree in that sense would in no way interfere with the exercise of the Secretary's discretion with respect to the issue of a passport but would simply preclude the denial of a passport on the sole ground that Miss Elg had lost her American citizenship."
The Supreme Court of the United States has never applied the term natural born citizen to any other category than those born in the country of parents who are citizens thereof.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.