Sibley Injects Stuxnet-Like Motion Challenging Obama's Eligibility

Montgomery Blair Sibley ^ | 02/06/2013 | M.B. Sibley

[TexasVoter]

Washington D.C. – A new front on the legal battle to establish that Barack Hussein Obama, II, is ineligible to be President was opened today by Montgomery Blair Sibley.

To date, no federal court has taken up the merits of Obama's eligibility relying instead on the dubious legal doctrine of “standing” to dismiss every lawsuit. Accordingly, Sibley has released his Stuxnet-like Motion to Dismiss Indictment into the federal prison system. The Motion makes the simple argument that: (i) no federal law is valid under Article I, § 7, cl. 2, of the Constitution unless it is presented to the President, (ii) Obama is not a legitimate President and thus (iii) his signing of the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009 (“FERA”) is void. Accordingly, every person charge and/or convicted under FERA is entitled to be released.

The Sixth Amendment to the Constitution guarantees: “in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall . . . have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor.” Thus the Motion demands federal subpoenas for Obama’s: (i) certificates of live birth, (ii) college applications from Occidental College, Columbia University and Harvard Law School, (iii) U.S. Passport application, (iv) Social Security application and (v) Selective Service registration information – documents Obama has refused to reveal despite repeated requests.

[Lancey Howard]

I like Sibley. That’s a nicely crafted statement right there.

[Kenny Bunk]

Res ipsa loquitur. Ipso facto. Post hoc, propter hoc. Amicus curiae. Quod erat demonstratum. Salus publicae, prima lex. Gallia omnis in tres partes divisa est. Ex parte. Pro se. In propria persona. Qui custodet custodes? Hoc est punctum quod inter gentes ferro et ignis dividitur. Ad litem. Habeas corpus. Mamma frickin' mia.

Have we not had enough circling about these legal Robin Hood's barns? The courts, may the gods damn them, certainly have. They are having NONE of it. Those prisoners languishing in durance vile as a result of FERA, shall long there remain.

The ruling piece of legal dog-latin? Res judicata. Which means "other courts have looked at this. They have decided, and we all (surprise surprise) agree." So Attorney Montgomery Blair Sibley (quel beau nom historique!) Foxtrot Oscar.

There is no Santa Claus. But the Easter Bunny is coming to tell all adults, "The Law, Fairness, and Logic can tend to be mutually exclusive matters."