Posted on 02/15/2013 6:51:55 PM PST by Seizethecarp
As reported here and here Dr. Taitz filed a petition with the Supreme Court for the Obama eligibility case Noonan v Bowen. The petition was referred to the full court and distributed for conference scheduled for February 15, 2013.
Here is the initial order list for February 15th, 2013. The short list of granted petitions does not include Noonan v Bowen. Another list will be released by the SCOTUS on Monday or Tuesday. It is normal for them to release a short list of the granted petitions before they release a very long list of denied petitions. The longer list sometimes includes a couple more granted petitions.
No cert from SCOTUS on Taitz’s Noonan case ping...
GUTLESS SCOTUS
The fix is in. The SC does not want to peel back the layers and expose the emperor.
Today’s orders: no grants yet
The Supreme Court on Friday released a series of orders, all dealing with divisions of argument in cases to be heard over the next two weeks. No new cases were granted review on Friday. If any cases are being accepted from Friday’s Conference, that will be noted among the regular orders due out at 9:30 a.m. on Tuesday.
http://www.scotusblog.com/2013/02/todays-orders-no-grants-yet/
He’s a fraud...and he’s using tax payer’s money to TRY and hide the fact.
Before the stolen, fraudulent “election” of 2012, I might have been upset by this, but, I take great satisfaction in knowing everyone concerned with covering Bath-House’s filthy ass will pay...eventually...before the Judge of judges.
Totally understood.
These people view themselves as gods and are going to be surprised when they will be required to give an accounting to the God of gods. (See Deut 10:17)
Not a surpise.
Political cowardice is epidemic in Washington.
Great post. The thing I am most afraid of is that the Supreme Court takes the case, finds Obama guilty of fraud and the American people yawn....kinda like they did with Clinton. I think it would be worse to find out he is a fraud and the American people (the idiot half) demand he stay as President.
Too many people riled up for that, I think.
Any left-leaning people with a sense of justice or rule-of-law (they do exist) will feel VERY betrayed. And those statists who will declare that it's "no big deal" and/or act as apologists for the state will REALLY piss off everyone.
The ever-growing "this ain't right" crowd (which you should count as everyone prepping for war, AND MORE) will see there is HUGE amounts of corruption.
No, I don't think people in-general will simply roll-over and go back to sleep.
riddle this one for me: http://gopthedailydose.com/2013/02/15/the-hon-john-roberts-chief-justice-has-scheduled-to-hear-case-regarding-obamas-forged-ids-in-conference-before-the-full-supreme-court/
Sure. "Amy" doesn't have a freakin' clue of what she's talking about.
If Noonan v. Bowen wasn't on yesterday's cert list, it'll be on Tuesday's loser list, denied without comment like every other birther case that has crossed the USSC.
There was never any “hearing” scheduled by Roberts. That was an incorrect, misleading article. This was the weekly “conference” where a list of pending appeals that one or two judges have previously individually reviewed are routinely almost all rejected UNLESS four judges indicate they want the case to be scheduled (granted certiorari) for an actual hearing before the full court.
SCOTUS is not a trial court, but an appeals court. Only a trial court can accept evidence yet Dr. Taitz persists in attempting to enter “evidence” into her appeals court filings. An appeals court like SCOTUS will only determine whether the lower courts correctly applied the law to the facts in evidence in the trial court. Orly never got a trial on the merits in this case so her evidence never even made it into the lowest trial court.
isn’t Amy “appealing” the California decision to the Supremes?
isn’t Amy “appealing” the California decision to the Supremes?
isn’t Amy “appealing” the California decision to the Supremes?
The article at your link is full of errors. Dr. Taitz never got to prove up her evidence in the lower court so SCOTUS can’t possibly rule in favor of her claimed evidence. She has only made claims about her evidence. Her case was dismissed before any trail on a pre-trail motion from the defense without the evidence being presented at trial.
“Dr. Taitz never got to prove up her evidence in the lower court....”
Yep. All the courts in the US are corrupt.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.