Skip to comments.
Chris Matthews: Rand Paul Will Be Republican Presidential Nominee in 2016
Newsbusters ^
| 08/08/2013
| Noel Shepphard
Posted on 08/08/2013 9:28:34 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
To: SeekAndFind
“The Democrats ran moderates in 60 and 64 and 68”
That is so much cr@p.
Maybe JFK was a “moderate” Maybe.
But LBJ and Humphrey were both HUGE Nanny State lefties.
2
posted on
08/08/2013 9:31:05 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
To: SeekAndFind
What? it won’t be Chris Christie?
But its his turn!
/s
3
posted on
08/08/2013 9:31:06 AM PDT
by
PGR88
To: SeekAndFind
No, it will be Palin/Paul
(If I have anything to say about it)
for 16 years of conservative bliss
4
posted on
08/08/2013 9:31:16 AM PDT
by
Mr. K
(Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics, and then Democrat Talking Points.)
To: SeekAndFind
Well... we could do worse than Rand...we already have done worse..Much worse...
5
posted on
08/08/2013 9:31:44 AM PDT
by
Quickgun
(I got here kicking,screaming and covered in someone else's blood. I can go out that way if I have to)
To: SeekAndFind
We could do worse. An actual candidate who is eligible according to the Constitution. What a concept.
(With apologies to Ted Cruz who I admire greatly - could be a great president if we are willing to look the other way on the Constitutional requirements for the Presidency).
To: SeekAndFind
7
posted on
08/08/2013 9:32:13 AM PDT
by
Third Person
(Welcome to Gaymerica.)
To: SeekAndFind
8
posted on
08/08/2013 9:32:23 AM PDT
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: SeekAndFind
"The hard-right is going to take over the Republican Party in 2016 ..Which would be like the hard-right taking over the Democrat party, same thing, which means no way in hell - which is why we need a new party.
9
posted on
08/08/2013 9:33:03 AM PDT
by
GrandJediMasterYoda
(Someday our schools will teach the difference between "lose" and "loose")
To: SeekAndFind
How does Matthews know this? Did he get a tingle up his leg or something?
10
posted on
08/08/2013 9:33:29 AM PDT
by
SMARTY
("The test of every religious, political, or educational system is the man that it forms." H. Amiel)
To: Quickgun; Third Person
RE: Well... we could do worse than Rand...we already have done worse..Much worse...
I don’t know.... replace the name “Rand Paul” with “Marco Rubio” and we get a huge number of FReepers shouting “Traitor” !!
But I don’t read that word being posted in this thread at all.
Doesn’t anybody realize that Rand Paul is sympathetic to some form of amnesty as well?
SEE HERE:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3029582/posts
To: SeekAndFind
How does he explain Reagan? He wasn’t moderate.
To: SeekAndFind
DNC Decoder:
“We are in serious trouble...all troops target Rand Paul”
13
posted on
08/08/2013 9:38:02 AM PDT
by
Zathras
To: SeekAndFind
14
posted on
08/08/2013 9:38:32 AM PDT
by
meangene
To: SeekAndFind
That would be just fine with me.
15
posted on
08/08/2013 9:39:16 AM PDT
by
jimfree
(In November 2016 my 13 y/o granddaughter will have more quality exec experience than Barack Obama)
To: InterceptPoint
There’s no need to look the other way.
Any presidential eligibility questions we may have had are now gone. The issue has been settled. Constitutionally settled.
Hundreds of lower courts have decided Obama is a Natural Born Citizen. The SCOTUS validated that by not reviewing it.
What else is there to say? Except...
Cruz/Whoever - 2016.
16
posted on
08/08/2013 9:39:53 AM PDT
by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: InterceptPoint
With Cruz as Senate Majority Leader, putting the Senate on "Cruz Control", plus a Constitution loving and following President, we could be in a very good place once more!
We would finally be heading in the right direction again, toward the health and prosperity that are our birthrights when we honor our founding documents and follow our Judeo-Christian philosophy and heritage.
17
posted on
08/08/2013 9:40:33 AM PDT
by
GBA
(Our obamanation: Romans 1:18-32)
To: SeekAndFind
Chris Matthews: Rand Paul Will Be Republican Presidential Nominee in 2016Old Sarge: Chrissy Tingles can paint herself magenta and hurl her arse from the center span of the Verrazano Narrows before I ever listen to what she has to say!
18
posted on
08/08/2013 9:40:51 AM PDT
by
Old Sarge
(My "KMA List" is growing daily...)
To: SeekAndFind
Since Chris Matthews is never right about anything, I doubt it.
Based on their recent record, the Republicans might nominate Hillary Clinton.
Or they might as well.
19
posted on
08/08/2013 9:41:56 AM PDT
by
Sooth2222
("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
To: SeekAndFind
For once I agree with Chrissy and hope he’s right.
20
posted on
08/08/2013 9:43:06 AM PDT
by
pgkdan
(Marco Rubio can go straight to hell!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson