Skip to comments.
Chris Matthews: Rand Paul Will Be Republican Presidential Nominee in 2016
Newsbusters ^
| 08/08/2013
| Noel Shepphard
Posted on 08/08/2013 9:28:34 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 last
To: GraceG
If his ego accepts the offer, I'll know what I need to know about him and will concede my earlier mistake.
We'll just have to wait and see. He seems to be coy about dodging POTUS questions in the interviews I've heard.
He is, however, in a unique position to become Senate leader and I respect the power and longevity of influence that position has and how it has been abused, much to our detriment, pain and suffering.
I pray we don't throw his rare opportunity away.
We need fighters and leaders like him, who think and believe like he does, in Congress. No more Rubios, McCains and McConnells!
61
posted on
08/08/2013 11:22:04 AM PDT
by
GBA
(Our obamanation: Romans 1:18-32)
To: SeekAndFind
"The hard-right is going to take over the Republican Party in 2016 and the nomination is going to Rand Paul" The very chance to test the hypothesis that the GOP lost in 2008 & 2012 because they ran RINOs.
62
posted on
08/08/2013 11:26:12 AM PDT
by
Mike Darancette
(Fight the culture of nothing.)
To: Old Sarge
A salute, my friend, and thank you. Hope you are well!
63
posted on
08/08/2013 11:41:33 AM PDT
by
Colonel_Flagg
(Army dad. And damned proud.)
To: Old Sarge; Colonel_Flagg
I join you! It’s a bleak list.
64
posted on
08/08/2013 11:44:22 AM PDT
by
luvie
(All my heroes wear camos! Thank you David, Michael, Chris Txradioguy, JJ, CMS, & ALL of you heroes!)
To: LUV W
Lists of Democrats always are.
Hello dear lady.
65
posted on
08/08/2013 11:44:57 AM PDT
by
Colonel_Flagg
(Army dad. And damned proud.)
To: SeekAndFind
When has Matthews been right on anything?
66
posted on
08/08/2013 11:45:58 AM PDT
by
0.E.O
To: Colonel_Flagg
Well, hello! How are you doing, sir?
It really brings it into focus (and causes mass shudders) when it’s all there for the reading. And the 2nd list was telling, too. :)
67
posted on
08/08/2013 11:56:24 AM PDT
by
luvie
(All my heroes wear camos! Thank you David, Michael, Chris Txradioguy, JJ, CMS, & ALL of you heroes!)
To: LUV W
Passable, thanks.
The list looks like the Most Wanted wall at the Post Office.
68
posted on
08/08/2013 12:08:20 PM PDT
by
Colonel_Flagg
(Army dad. And damned proud.)
To: Colonel_Flagg
It does...except they could be called the Least Wanted. :)
Good you’re ok!...me, too. Having a nice day off! *ducking*
69
posted on
08/08/2013 12:16:48 PM PDT
by
luvie
(All my heroes wear camos! Thank you David, Michael, Chris Txradioguy, JJ, CMS, & ALL of you heroes!)
To: GraceG; SeekAndFind
Rand may belive in Open Borders as he is a liberal-tarian type, but I think he believes in the philosophy that you can have welfare state or open borders, but not BOTH.
Well put.
But what is his position on the Senate bill?
70
posted on
08/08/2013 12:35:37 PM PDT
by
kenavi
(Debunk THIS!)
To: kenavi
He was against the Senate bill because there is no provision to secure the borders or fix the visa system, among other reasons.
71
posted on
08/08/2013 3:26:15 PM PDT
by
Plummz
(pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
To: Mr. K
JMHO...Rand Paul is much more electable than is Palin. A real lot of voters who have their minds made up against Palin will go for Rand Paul because of his progressive-less government-less spying on us stances are appealing, even when the social conservatism is not.
72
posted on
08/08/2013 3:31:26 PM PDT
by
grania
To: Colonel_Flagg
1972 - George McGovern. See 1976 (Jimmy Carter without the anti-Semitism.
Actually, after his Senatorial career, McGovern presided over an organization that saw Israeli settlements as the primary obstacle to peace.
If he had been elected President, McGovern never would have followed the policies of Carter that preserved the climate in which Sadat could make peace with Israel.
73
posted on
08/08/2013 4:00:30 PM PDT
by
kenavi
(Debunk THIS!)
Thanks SeekAndFind.
- ...by softening its edge on some volatile social issues and altering its image as the party always seemingly "eager to go to war... We do need to expand the party and grow the party and that does mean that we don't always all agree on every issue" ... the party needs to become more welcoming to individuals who disagree with basic Republican doctrine on emotional social issues such as gay marriage... "We're going to have to be a little hands off on some of these issues ... and get people into the party," Paul said. [Rand Paul: Time for GOP to soften [immigration, gay marriage] stance]
74
posted on
08/08/2013 7:33:12 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(It's no coincidence that some "conservatives" echo the hard left.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson