Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chris Matthews: Rand Paul Will Be Republican Presidential Nominee in 2016
Newsbusters ^ | 08/08/2013 | Noel Shepphard

Posted on 08/08/2013 9:28:34 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last
To: GraceG
If his ego accepts the offer, I'll know what I need to know about him and will concede my earlier mistake.

We'll just have to wait and see. He seems to be coy about dodging POTUS questions in the interviews I've heard.

He is, however, in a unique position to become Senate leader and I respect the power and longevity of influence that position has and how it has been abused, much to our detriment, pain and suffering.

I pray we don't throw his rare opportunity away.

We need fighters and leaders like him, who think and believe like he does, in Congress. No more Rubios, McCains and McConnells!

61 posted on 08/08/2013 11:22:04 AM PDT by GBA (Our obamanation: Romans 1:18-32)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"The hard-right is going to take over the Republican Party in 2016 and the nomination is going to Rand Paul"

The very chance to test the hypothesis that the GOP lost in 2008 & 2012 because they ran RINOs.

62 posted on 08/08/2013 11:26:12 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (Fight the culture of nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge

A salute, my friend, and thank you. Hope you are well!


63 posted on 08/08/2013 11:41:33 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (Army dad. And damned proud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge; Colonel_Flagg

I join you! It’s a bleak list.


64 posted on 08/08/2013 11:44:22 AM PDT by luvie (All my heroes wear camos! Thank you David, Michael, Chris Txradioguy, JJ, CMS, & ALL of you heroes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: LUV W

Lists of Democrats always are.

Hello dear lady.


65 posted on 08/08/2013 11:44:57 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (Army dad. And damned proud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

When has Matthews been right on anything?


66 posted on 08/08/2013 11:45:58 AM PDT by 0.E.O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colonel_Flagg

Well, hello! How are you doing, sir?

It really brings it into focus (and causes mass shudders) when it’s all there for the reading. And the 2nd list was telling, too. :)


67 posted on 08/08/2013 11:56:24 AM PDT by luvie (All my heroes wear camos! Thank you David, Michael, Chris Txradioguy, JJ, CMS, & ALL of you heroes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: LUV W

Passable, thanks.

The list looks like the Most Wanted wall at the Post Office.


68 posted on 08/08/2013 12:08:20 PM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (Army dad. And damned proud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Colonel_Flagg

It does...except they could be called the Least Wanted. :)

Good you’re ok!...me, too. Having a nice day off! *ducking*


69 posted on 08/08/2013 12:16:48 PM PDT by luvie (All my heroes wear camos! Thank you David, Michael, Chris Txradioguy, JJ, CMS, & ALL of you heroes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: GraceG; SeekAndFind
Rand may belive in Open Borders as he is a liberal-tarian type, but I think he believes in the philosophy that you can have welfare state or open borders, but not BOTH.

Well put.

But what is his position on the Senate bill?
70 posted on 08/08/2013 12:35:37 PM PDT by kenavi (Debunk THIS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: kenavi

He was against the Senate bill because there is no provision to secure the borders or fix the visa system, among other reasons.


71 posted on 08/08/2013 3:26:15 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

JMHO...Rand Paul is much more electable than is Palin. A real lot of voters who have their minds made up against Palin will go for Rand Paul because of his progressive-less government-less spying on us stances are appealing, even when the social conservatism is not.


72 posted on 08/08/2013 3:31:26 PM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Colonel_Flagg
1972 - George McGovern. See 1976 (Jimmy Carter without the anti-Semitism.

Actually, after his Senatorial career, McGovern presided over an organization that saw Israeli settlements as the primary obstacle to peace.

If he had been elected President, McGovern never would have followed the policies of Carter that preserved the climate in which Sadat could make peace with Israel.
73 posted on 08/08/2013 4:00:30 PM PDT by kenavi (Debunk THIS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

Thanks SeekAndFind.
74 posted on 08/08/2013 7:33:12 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's no coincidence that some "conservatives" echo the hard left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson