Posted on 09/13/2013 4:20:14 AM PDT by ABrit
The English Lose Their Capital City
I wrote the following to my English Member of Parliament.
On Sunday evening I walked along the South Bank of the Thames, almost opposite the House of Commons. The area was populated almost entirely by non ethnically English people. Perhaps you and your fellow Members of Parliament would care to take the time to see for yourself that example of an area of London that has been occupied by foreign people?
According to the 2011 Census the English population of London is now a minority 40%. I thought it had been British policy to defend the country...........More at link
(Excerpt) Read more at politicsandbiology.blogspot.co.uk ...
Nowhere near 40% of DC is imigrant. Try 5% tops.
80% black American, yes, but nothing close to 1/2 imigrant.
40% in London is truly outlandish.
40% of those living in London, not tourists, bonehead....which is HUGE. No city in the USA even comes close.
Try reading the whole article, or is English not your 1st language?
Wasn't it John Rocker who made some "offensive" comments about the denizens of NYC, while visiting there to play ball - and wasn't he pretty much banned from the human race?
Rocker about being traded to NY, Rocker said, "I'd retire first. It's the most hectic, nerve-racking city. Imagine having to take the 7 Train to the ballpark looking like you're riding through Beirut next to some kid with purple hair, next to some queer with AIDS, right next to some dude who just got out of jail for the fourth time, right next to some 20-year-old mom with four kids. It's depressing...
The biggest thing I don't like about New York are the foreigners. You can walk an entire block in Times Square and not hear anybody speaking English. Asians and Koreans and Vietnamese and Indians and Russians and Spanish people and everything up there. How the hell did they get in this country?"
About his actually playing for the Mets, "Nowhere else in the country do people spit at you, throw bottles at you, throw quarters at you, throw batteries at you and say, 'Hey, I did your mother last night — she's a whore.' I talked about what degenerates they were and they proved me right."
Now this article about how Britain is no longer British, no longer speaking English but everything but!
To quote my favorite pastor (/not) Rev. Wright,"America's chickens are comin' home to roost," except in this case it's about the British!
Beg to differ. When talking about ‘losing’ a country’s capital, it doesn’t matter if they are immigrant or black. Sounds racist, maybe is, but it is the truth.
As for immigrant - if you’re disposed to investigating the makeup of the counties surrounding DC, you’d find an EXTREMELY high number of foreigners you’d never have suspected were there.
In short, the very one thing that DC and its surrounding areas is, is NOT traditional America.
I never said it wasn't so I'm keeping that trophy I got in the national bee. :)
The article mentions a walk along the south bank and the writers observation of of an “example of an area of London that has been occupied by foreign people?”
Yeah, tourists, bonehead.
The 40% is a fabrication as well, it’s 45% “white british” with another 175,000 white Irish, one million “white other” and a mixture of British asian, british carribean and british africans. Or do they not count as British if their skin colour is other than white?
They’re not nice areas but don’t make out they’re representative - Brixton is gentified these days, tower hamlets has always been an immigrant stopping off point - 70 years ago you’d be complaining about perfidious Jewry taking over the East End
Dearborn. 40,000 muslims in a city around 100,000 population.
if it is really possible to give a capital away, or at least a capitol, we’ve gone one we can happily donate....
I should clarify that. Wikipedia shows the population of "Arab Americans" as 40,000 in Dearborn. The article is clear in stating that "most" of the Arabs in the area are actually Lebanese Christians who immigrated early in the 20th century to work the automotive industry. However, a better understanding is that there is a significant muslim population there.
Some estimates are that the muslims make up 33,000 of the 40,000 identified as "Arab American".
Whenever I despair about London, I think of the Golan-Globus science fiction movie “Lifeforce” (1985). Which, in addition to having buxom space vampirette Mathilda May walking around buck nekked for the first part of the movie, features London brought low by space vampires.
While it represents no urban renewal along the lines of the Great London Fire of 1666, at least you know the city was finally purged of Pakistani Muslims.
In Britain, like all of Europe, if you are not white—you are definitely an immigrant, first, second, or at most third generation. Unlike in the USA, non-whites don’t go back to much earlier than WWII. Might you be a citizen? Yes, and in that sense you’d be British. In about the same sense that 1/2 Kenyan Obama is a red-blooded American.
Foreign roots, culture, and race actually do happen to go hand and hand in Europe in a way they never have in America—that’s just a fact, and its not xenophobic or racist to admit that.
Your islet of logic has been submerged quickly.
You claim that a tourist area is not representative.
You are then confronted with areas almost wholly inhabited by immigrants and where foreign cultures reign supreme, unchallenged and even encouraged by prior governments and bureaucrats. This is not a ‘stopping off’ point - it is an avenue, a haven.
Other areas ARE permanently occupied by immigrants and/or their offspring. Permanent doesn’t get more ‘representative’ than that, despite your conveniently shifting definition.
“The 40% is a fabrication as well, it’s 45% “white british”...”
The 45% white British includes Welsh, Scottish and Northern Irish (who have their own national capital cities, Cardiff, Edinburgh and Belfast). Take away 5% to account for that and you are left with 40% white English people. The other 60% are NOT white and therefore NOT racially English, or they are foreign.
60% of the resident population of London is NOT ENGLISH, and their birth rates are a lot higher than the English, so eventually the English will be over-run by sheer weight of numbers. Ethnically cleansed because we were too “nice” to complain!
We went first...a long time ago.
bump
that’s not true.
Note that the 40% immigrant are not majority non-European. Rather there are quite a few Eastern Europeans as well as Western Europeans in London who make up that immigrant population
London doesn’t have that many Pakis. That’s Birmingham more...
Who are the dominant minorities in London?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.