Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Still Willing To Take A Ride Into Outer Space With NASA After This Global Warming Message?

Posted on 01/26/2014 4:13:05 PM PST by lbryce



TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: agw; climatechange; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; glowbullwarming; hoax; nasa
NASA has lost its credibility long ago.

Notice the term is phrased as temperature "anomaly", for one. Also it depends on where you take the measurements from. If you take measurements from cities you will see higher temps. If you take measurements from rural areas you will actually see a cooling trend. This is why they backed off from "global warming" and changed it to "global climate change.

1 posted on 01/26/2014 4:13:05 PM PST by lbryce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Yeah and they all use the same temperature monitoring stations. Ya know the ones positioned on building roofs and concrete parking lots.


2 posted on 01/26/2014 4:14:50 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
Am I reading this correctly?

A half a degree?

They want to destroy business for a half a degree?

Where is the information on Sun activity at the same time? Oh, they aren't considering that?

3 posted on 01/26/2014 4:16:53 PM PST by Volunteer (Though I know that the hypnotized never lie, do ya? - The Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Volunteer

A half degree Celcius.

Which is like....millions of degrees Fahrenheit


4 posted on 01/26/2014 4:19:22 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

I have serious doubts that any data taken from different places all over the world would look like an exact copy of one another.


5 posted on 01/26/2014 4:24:48 PM PST by melsec (Once a Jolly Swagman camped by a Billabong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Volunteer
1 degree Celsius is about 33.8 degrees Fahrenheit.

But I sure don't see the affects of Global Warming here in S.E. Louisiana.

6 posted on 01/26/2014 4:36:56 PM PST by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

No, a *change* of 1 degree C is 9/5 = 1.8 degree F.


7 posted on 01/26/2014 4:40:39 PM PST by Royal Wulff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

When was the Environmental Protection Agency started? Is that when the temperature started climbing?


8 posted on 01/26/2014 4:45:12 PM PST by B4Ranch (http://discoverthenetworks.org/ This website describes the networks / agendas of the political Left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

Your Celcious to Farehnheit converter must have been made in China.


9 posted on 01/26/2014 4:48:45 PM PST by lbryce (Obama:The Worst is Yet To Come)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

I got it from an ad on Current TV.

The Algore special. I’m serial!


10 posted on 01/26/2014 4:54:51 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

The earth is 4.5 million years old and I should panic because of a chart of the last 130 years.


11 posted on 01/26/2014 5:00:16 PM PST by Lurkina.n.Learnin (This is not just stupid, we're talking Democrat stupid here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Royal Wulff

1 degree C = 1.8 F...that’s the approximate ratio of miles to kilometres.....is there a correlation escaping my pea brain ? Degrees celsius are larger than our degrees whereas Kilos are smaller than miles, but the ratio interests me.


12 posted on 01/26/2014 5:07:25 PM PST by chiller (NBCNews et al is in the tank and should be embarrassed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
Does NASA disagree with the numbers on this chart?


13 posted on 01/26/2014 5:08:10 PM PST by TigersEye (Stupid is a Progressive disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

but only if the thermometer has a 100 watt light bulb shining directly on it


14 posted on 01/26/2014 5:16:35 PM PST by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Royal Wulff; Robert DeLong; digger48
No, a *change* of 1 degree C is 9/5 = 1.8 degree F.

No, a *change* of 1 degree C is 9/5 = 1.8 MILLION degrees F.

it is climate change here people get it rite

15 posted on 01/26/2014 5:53:21 PM PST by bigheadfred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

All four of these “agencies” are probably dependent upon government dollars to buy their temperature gauges. I’m sorry, any time government dollars are involved, I’m going to be skeptical. The government doesn’t hand out money to people who go against that government’s agenda.


16 posted on 01/26/2014 5:53:40 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (ObamaCare. The "global warming" of healthcare plans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Fer shure, fer shure!

I’ll go up, have a look-see, and come back to tellem that there is no FRicking Global Warming!

It is a figment of thier political funding imagination!

What a bunch of maroons!


17 posted on 01/26/2014 6:04:35 PM PST by Taxman (So that the beautiful pressure does not diminish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

NASA shouldn’t be “studying” anything of this kind anyway, but the handful of agitprop generators behind the four “studies” aren’t scientists, whatever their paperwork states.


18 posted on 01/26/2014 6:07:42 PM PST by SunkenCiv (;http://www.freerepublic.com/~mestamachine/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Ya know the ones positioned on building roofs and concrete parking lots.

Not to mention next to the outdoor components of HVAC systems.


19 posted on 01/26/2014 7:11:35 PM PST by Fred Hayek (The Democratic Party is now the operational arm of the CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

I think this chart is faked. They’re all using the same data, just different versions of it (different interpretations of proxy data).

Remember Michael Mann’s “nature trick” where he grafted proxy data onto temperature measurements?

This destroys all confidence that NASA is scientifically competent. They put their reputation on the line with this chart.

And the way it’s worded has the nasty feline touch of the progressive Democrat.

So its all political science from now on from NASA.


20 posted on 01/26/2014 7:23:45 PM PST by JT Hatter (Who is Barack Obama? And What is He Really Up To?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

The problem with the poster is it is a strawman.

No one is arguing that the temperature raised up a degree or two, but WHY? That is the dispute. Not the WHAT happened but the WHY it happened.

They are deliberately twisting the truth. The dispute that I as a scientist make is the idea that human beings have caused this. NO SUCH PROOF.

The temperature has gone up, but it has not been proved to be caused by carbon dioxide created by the human industrialism on the planet.


21 posted on 01/26/2014 7:41:05 PM PST by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chiller

No relation to kilo/mile. Celsius divided the range from freezing to boiling water into 100 units. Fahrenheit divided it into 180 units. That’s why there’s 180/100 = 9/5 F degrees per C degree.


22 posted on 01/26/2014 7:52:44 PM PST by Royal Wulff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Answer me this: how does that chart help with NASA’s core mission to make muslims feel better about themselves?


23 posted on 01/26/2014 8:04:06 PM PST by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JT Hatter
Remember Michael Mann’s “nature trick” where he grafted proxy data onto temperature measurements?

I think you mean the "hockey stick" in which Mann used fake data.

24 posted on 01/26/2014 8:05:00 PM PST by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

So very eloquent, so very apropos. :-)


25 posted on 01/26/2014 8:59:44 PM PST by lbryce (Obama:The Worst is Yet To Come)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin
The way you phrased it, comic genius.

And Why I should give a s**t....old style Jewish comic genius.

26 posted on 01/26/2014 9:03:06 PM PST by lbryce (Obama:The Worst is Yet To Come)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong
1 degree Celsius is about 33.8 degrees Fahrenheit.

The boiling point of water is 100° Celsius, the freezing point of water is 0° Celsius, therefore the range between freezing and boiling is 100° on the Celsius scale.

The boiling point of water is 212° Fahrenheit, the freezing point of water is 32° Fahrenheit, therefore the range between freezing and boiling is 180° on the Fahrenheit scale.

Since the range of temperature between freezing and boiling for water (measured at sea level) represents the same change in thermal energy added to the water we can say that 180° Fahrenheit is equal to 100° Celsius. Dividing both sides of the equation by 100 yields 1°Celsius = 1.8° Fahrenheit.

Regards,
GtG

PS -40° is the only point where the temperature is the same on both Celsius and Fahrenheit scales.

27 posted on 01/26/2014 9:25:31 PM PST by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

I didn’t know NASA was around in 1880 to oversee precision temperature measurement and data compilation.


28 posted on 01/26/2014 10:01:22 PM PST by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gandalf_The_Gray

I stand corrected then, or rather the converter I used stands corrected. It said 1 degree C = 33.8 degrees F.


29 posted on 01/27/2014 4:27:27 AM PST by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Royal Wulff

I stand corrected then, or rather the converter I used stands corrected. It said 1 degree C = 33.8 degrees F.


30 posted on 01/27/2014 4:28:57 AM PST by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

That’s the one. He has several versions and all of them creatively hide the Maunder Minimum and the divergence of actual temperature readings from the model-predicted path for temperature.


31 posted on 01/27/2014 6:28:33 AM PST by JT Hatter (Who is Barack Obama? And What is He Really Up To?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: JT Hatter

Medieval Warming Period—not Maunder Minimum.


32 posted on 01/27/2014 6:31:48 AM PST by JT Hatter (Who is Barack Obama? And What is He Really Up To?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

bttt


33 posted on 01/27/2014 6:32:21 AM PST by bmwcyle (People who do not study history are destine to believe really ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson