Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaking: Judge rules on Obama eligibility
WND ^ | March 21, 2014 | bob Unruh

Posted on 03/22/2014 5:57:33 AM PDT by iontheball

One of the last remaining court battles over Barack Obama’s presidential eligibility has gone down in flames in a 7-2 decision by the Alabama Supreme Court to render “no opinion.”

However, the dissenting minority of Justice Tom Parker and Chief Justice Roy Moore concluded the case has serious constitutional significance, warranting an investigation of the qualifications of 2012 presidential candidates by Alabama’s secretary of state.

Moore wrote in his dissent that the circuit court should have granted the plaintiffs’ request to order the state secretary of state “to implement the natural-born-citizen requirement of the presidential-qualifications clause in future elections.”

“Although the removal of a president-elect or a president who has taken the oath of office is within the breast of Congress, the determination of the eligibility of the 2012 presidential candidates before the casting of the electoral votes is a state function,” Moore argued.

He said the case was of “great constitutional significance in regard to the highest office in our land.”

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: alabama; birthers; eligibility; fraud; naturalborncitizen; obama
Judges point the finger at the various Secretaries of State and the Secretaries alledge they are not investigative bodies so they can not do anything about it. Before the 2012 election, I personnally wrote Cuccinelli about this issue in Virginia and told him to investigate the fraud because he was the chief law enforcement officer in Virginia. He passed the buck by claiming he had no authority or duty to do so. That weasel-ass statement turned me off on him forever. He could have made a name for himself but instead in did nothing and he now is relegated to the trash heap of miserable politicians in my book.

The miserable secretaries of state have the gaul to claim that all they are required to do is take the candidate's application and slap his/her name on the official state ballot. They would have us believe that their highly paid taxpayer position places no responsibility/duty on them to prevent fraud on the voters of their state. It is all surreal and mindboggling. Fingers are pointed in each others direction and no one wants to do their damn job.

1 posted on 03/22/2014 5:57:33 AM PDT by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: iontheball

Pelosi’s signature is on the eligibility doc, the feckless GOP will do nothing to bring this to an end result because they to have skeletons in thier closet or are being paid under the table. They are all complicit in this.


2 posted on 03/22/2014 6:02:00 AM PDT by ronnie raygun (Im missing a jumbo jet with 235 passengers has anyone seen it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun

GOP and Dems make up one big good old boys club and do not serve the country. they serve themselves.


3 posted on 03/22/2014 6:07:07 AM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: iontheball

chicken

bock bock bock baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaak


4 posted on 03/22/2014 6:08:12 AM PDT by yldstrk ( My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iontheball

Using partisan state officials to deny a candidate access to their ballot is potentially a double-edged sword. Enough blue states have sufficiently corrupt officials that they could tie up their ballot long enough to keep conservative candidates off their ballots and potentially skew every future election. As much as I’d like to see Obama exposed we need to take care we don’t manufacture a weapon that will be used against us. An example of this might be Harry Reid’s “nuclear option.” It works fine for the Democrats while they maintain control of the Senate, but how will they fare when they eventually lose and that option is still in place for Republicans to use. (BTW, I fully expect the Republicans will eliminate their advantage at the first opportunity and they may be right in leveling the playing field again as unfair advantage breeds a lot of hard feelings. I just hope we get a chance to undo some damage perpetrated by the Obama administration first.)


5 posted on 03/22/2014 6:10:17 AM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iontheball

Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah...........

(The law may be CLEAR, but we’re not a-gonna TOUCH it!)

..........ba blah, blah, blah!)


6 posted on 03/22/2014 6:11:29 AM PDT by Flintlock ( islam is a LIE, mohammed was a CRIMINAL, sharia is POISON.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iontheball

This is not what the framers of the U.S. Constitution envisioned.


7 posted on 03/22/2014 6:17:03 AM PDT by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iontheball

I have had a consistent position on this since 2009.

It is this: There is a proper, Constitutional forum to address the question. That forum did so on January 6, 2009, and the matter is at an end as regards the person calling himself “Obama”.

There was plenty of relevant evidence to allow the Special Joint Session of Congress to investigate. It was known to everyone with a keyboard and a monitor, and it was certainly known to the participants in the session.

All that was required was a written objection, from ONE SINGLE Member of Congress and ONE SINGLE Senator. No such objection was raised, and “Obama” was certified by the presiding officer (Richard “Dick” Cheney of Wyoming).

That was the end of the matter. The power of Congress to count the Electoral votes and to certify a President-Elect is plenary, there is no avenue for appeal.


8 posted on 03/22/2014 6:18:20 AM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise. H)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalebert
dalebert @3: "GOP and Dems make up one big good old boys club and do not serve the country. they serve themselves."

Worse than not serving the country, worse than serving themselves, the RINOs and Demonrats, in their hell-spawned club, give aid and comfort to the enemy.

9 posted on 03/22/2014 6:19:12 AM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: iontheball

At least “defend the ten” Roy Moore stays true to his conservative and religious convictions!


10 posted on 03/22/2014 6:19:45 AM PDT by mdmathis6 (American Christians can help America best by remembering that we are Heaven's citizens first!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever
Progressives and RINOs alike will emerge a decade from now and acknowledge that BO was not a natural born citizen, but will declare, “You see, our republic is as strong as it has ever been even though we had a president who was foreign born”.

At this point they will shred the natural born requirement to become POTUS. It's coming.

Google how many times politicians have attacked the natural born clause to the constitution in the last twenty years...it's astonishing.

11 posted on 03/22/2014 6:27:44 AM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

I don’t think so. All they are asking is checking the qualifications required. They are all pretty simple: age, residency, etc. All that could be done easily in a day or so and through public records. (Even for the presidency.) They are not asking for any sort of big time investigation. Keep it simple and straight forward and it is less easy to corrupt.


12 posted on 03/22/2014 6:35:32 AM PDT by LaRueLaDue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather
Using partisan state officials to deny a candidate access to their ballot is potentially a double-edged sword.

Just quite the excuses and do what their job requires them to do. If the electorate were more knowledgeable, they would vote the crooked secretaries of state out of office for playing games like you suggest. If we constantly do the the politically correct thing, we are likely not doing the peoples’ bidding.
13 posted on 03/22/2014 6:40:19 AM PDT by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

That was the end of the matter. The power of Congress to count the Electoral votes and to certify a President-Elect is plenary, there is no avenue for appeal.

___________________________________________________

Are you contending that weasel-ass politicians can violate their oaths of office and, in so doing, commit treason by undermining the United States, and there is not a damn thing we can do about it?


14 posted on 03/22/2014 6:44:57 AM PDT by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LaRueLaDue

“All they are asking is checking the qualifications required. “

Accusations don’t have to be true if the purpose is to hold somebody off the ballot and their timing is right. All they need is a partisan judge and that’s most of them. It may not always work, but many elections are so close it doesn’t have to work every time.

The vetting for national office should be at the national level. It was Nancy Pelosi and others who “vetted” Obama and apparently did so either being aware he wasn’t qualified or they didn’t look too hard and failed their charge. If and when it is determined that he was not eligible, which I expect will happen shortly after he leaves office, as he’ll no longer have the power to stop investigations, then I hope to see those who “vetted” him put on trial, hopefully for conspiracy and treason. But, most likely that won’t happen as laws do not apply to the elite.


15 posted on 03/22/2014 6:46:03 AM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: iontheball
The following is accurate for not just the BC and eligibility, but all things obama and the demonrat party, including their GOPe lackies:

“First, the dishonesty is shameless and in your face. Mr Obama’s advisers, once they realized the ‘birth certificate’ was as bogus as a $3 bill, knew that if they simply went on pretending that $3 bills are legal tender the hard-left-dominated news media would carefully and continuously look the other way, pausing occasionally to sneer at anyone who pointed out that, in this constitutionally crucial respect, the ‘president’ has no clothes,” Monckton wrote.

The one known as "obama" answers to someone or something and they now own US.

And they, getting in your face, will laughingly tell you there's not a damn thing you can do about it.

By their fruits ye shall know them. Demonrats are evil and/or follow and enable evil, whether they realize it or not.

Welcome to their brave new world. Please pass the soma.

16 posted on 03/22/2014 6:46:15 AM PDT by GBA (Here in the Matrix, life is but a dream.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iontheball
Judges point the finger at the various Secretaries of State and the Secretaries alledge they are not investigative bodies so they can not do anything about it.

What Is The Secretary of State Project? [Soros money to distort elections]

17 posted on 03/22/2014 6:50:00 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (The less a man knows, the more certain he is that he knows it all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Yeah ... we have progressed through the various “steps” as provided to us in law. It’s been long past the end of the matter.


18 posted on 03/22/2014 7:48:29 AM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

I don’t think that will happen. The issue is fairly well dead in the eyes of the mass of the public and on both sides of the aisle. There will always be a few zealots around, so they’ll never disappear, but they’ll just be a curiosity and subject for mirthful conversations.


19 posted on 03/22/2014 7:51:23 AM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: iontheball

fl


20 posted on 03/22/2014 8:02:42 AM PDT by maine-iac7 (Christian is as Christian does - by their fruits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever

> This is not what the framers of the U.S. Constitution envisioned.

The framers of the Constitution would be very happy, very sad and very pissed off if they had a time travel machine and traveled to this moment in our history; very happy that they had put almost all of the key components into the Constitution to keep a tyrant like Obama from ascending the throne, very sad that the politicians don’t understand its importance, and very pissed off that they are allowing a tyrant put into place by a foreign power to dismantle it and too blind to realize that they have been invaded by a foreign power who is wreaking havoc from the inside out. Either that or they are so corrupt they are allowing him to do it for payoffs or were blackmailed into silence because of their wretched behavior.


21 posted on 03/22/2014 8:10:35 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: iontheball

“___________________________________________________

Are you contending that weasel-ass politicians can violate their oaths of office and, in so doing, commit treason by undermining the United States, and there is not a damn thing we can do about it?”

More or less.


22 posted on 03/22/2014 8:21:42 AM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise. H)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

Oh no, midnight Dec 31 2014, after they lose the majority in the Senate, they will with a simple majority vote, change the rules to be a 60 vote majority on everything for the R’s.


23 posted on 03/22/2014 8:37:23 AM PDT by thirst4truth (Life without God is like an unsharpened pencil - it has no point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: thirst4truth
Oh no, midnight Dec 31 2014, after they lose the majority in the Senate, they will with a simple majority vote, change the rules to be a 60 vote majority on everything for the R’s.

...and the minute the Republicans take over, they change it back. Rule changes do not bind a future Senate.

24 posted on 03/22/2014 8:45:19 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: iontheball
Typically bad reporting from WND. A more accurate summary, with a link to the court's actual decision, is here.
25 posted on 03/22/2014 8:49:20 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
Yeah ... we have progressed through the various “steps” as provided to us in law. It’s been long past the end of the matter.

______________________________________________________

Not quite. The whole miserable bunch have committed treasonous crimes, the likes of which we have not seen in our lifetime. The bastards need to be held accountable, and the punishment needs to be so sever that it will deter others who would consider doing the same. If we do not hold those responsible, we ascend into anarchy. Allowing this massive fraud on Americans to go without resolution is unthinkable. It is rotting out the core principles of this great country and reducing it to a totally lawless, corrupt third world junkyard.

26 posted on 03/22/2014 9:38:53 AM PDT by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: iontheball

You won’t be accomplishing what you want or say. There’s simply not the political support there.

HOWEVER, what you can accomplish is tweaking the system so that the same thing can’t happen again - and that will take “institutionalizing” changes. That part can be done.

I’ve said the same thing (about this, all along) - from the week after Obama’s election to now. It’s been absolutely consistent (my message on this). And that is “change the system institutionally” so it doesn’t happen again.


27 posted on 03/22/2014 9:44:50 AM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: dalebert

They do a
great job of dividing the country between conservative and liberal, when the real battle is the elite v. the masses. We are nothing but pawns to be sacrificed until we stand up for ourselves.


28 posted on 03/22/2014 10:58:22 AM PDT by CIDKauf (No man has a good enough memory to be a successful liar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: iontheball

The Eligibility Clause of the U.S. Constitution is used after the President-elect takes the Oath of Office to become the President of the United States. It cannot be used to prevent a President-elect from taking the oath because the President-elect has the option to respectfully decline to take the oath. Before giving the oath, the justice announced he/she is about to give the oath; thus, giving the President-elect an opportunity to decline the take the oath due to an ineligibility.

If an ineligible President assumes the Office of the President of the United States, then the only thing a concerned citizen can do is file a complaint in U.S. District Court and object to seek an exemption from the laws, rules, executive orders and appointments made by the usurper.


29 posted on 03/22/2014 11:06:19 AM PDT by SvenMagnussen (1983 ... the year Obama became a naturalized U.S. citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iontheball
Politicians don't want to deal with the Obama eligibility question because finding him ineligible would create a crisis that could easily destroy this nation. It is a legal nightmare that no one wants to address.

Impeachment or his resignation (it's more likely the sun wont come up tomorrow) would be much preferable.

30 posted on 03/22/2014 12:06:13 PM PDT by Mister Da (The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen

Going back to 2009, U.S. District Courts have consistently ruled that Obama qualifies for office as a natural born citizen.

Rhodes v. MacDonald, U.S. District Court Judge Clay D. Land: “A spurious claim questioning the president’s constitutional legitimacy may be protected by the First Amendment, but a Court’s placement of its imprimatur upon a claim that is so lacking in factual support that it is frivolous would undoubtedly disserve the public interest.”—U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, September 16, 2009.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/19809978/RHODES-v-MacDONALD-13-ORDER-denying-3-Motion-for-TRO-granting-8-Motion-to-Dismiss-Ordered-by-Judge-Clay-D-Land-on-09162009-CGC-Entered-0
.
Barnett v. Obama, U.S. District Court Judge David O. Carter: “There may very well be a legitimate role for the judiciary to interpret whether the natural born citizen requirement has been satisfied in the case of a presidential candidate who has not already won the election and taken office. However, on the day that President Obama took the presidential oath and was sworn in, he became President of the United States. Any removal of him from the presidency must be accomplished through the Constitution’s mechanisms for the removal of a President, either through impeachment or the succession process set forth in the Twenty-Fifth Amendment. Plaintiffs attempt to subvert this grant of power to Congress by convincing the Court that it should disregard the constitutional procedures in place for the removal of a sitting president. The process for removal of a sitting president—removal for any reason—is within the province of Congress, not the courts.”—U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, October 29, 2009
http://ia600204.us.archive.org/1/items/gov.uscourts.cacd.435591/gov.uscourts.cacd.435591.89.0.pdf

Taitz v. Obama (Quo Warranto) “This is one of several such suits filed by Ms. Taitz in her quixotic attempt to prove that President Obama is not a natural born citizen, as is required by the Constitution. This Court is not willing to go tilting at windmills with her.”— Chief U.S. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, April 14, 2010
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30040084/TAITZ-v-OBAMA-QW-23-MEMORANDUM-OPINION-dcd-04502943496-23-0

Tisdale v. Obama, U.S. District Court Judge John A. Gibney, Jr.: “It is well settled that those born within the United States are natural born citizens.”— U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of Virginia, January 23, 2012.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/82011399/Tisdale-v-Obama-EDVA-3-12-cv-00036-Doc-2-ORDER-23-Jan-2012


31 posted on 03/22/2014 2:25:22 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus (PALIN/CRUZ: 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

The missing key component can be corrected with a short and simple Constitutional amendment:

All federal politicians and appointees - you lie, you die.

The states can also add such for state level.


32 posted on 03/22/2014 8:25:09 PM PDT by Huskerfan44 (Huskerfan44 (22 Yr, Navy Vet))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777

+1


33 posted on 03/22/2014 9:26:25 PM PDT by Ray76 (Profit from the mistakes of others, you'll never live long enough to make them all yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

The headline is completely misleading.


34 posted on 03/22/2014 9:28:09 PM PDT by Ray76 (Profit from the mistakes of others, you'll never live long enough to make them all yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777; Seizethecarp; Red Steel; LucyT; little jeremiah; butterdezillion

+5


35 posted on 03/22/2014 9:30:04 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: iontheball; LucyT; null and void; Cold Case Posse Supporter; Flotsam_Jetsome; circumbendibus; ...

Eligibility ping...

The title of the WND article on the 7-2 Alabama case is misleading, but Chief Justice Moore did make some very interesting comments...


36 posted on 03/22/2014 9:43:30 PM PDT by Seizethecarp (Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iontheball

Our Constitution was written by honorable men representing with honor their particular constituents at the time when ‘honor’ had meaning and standing. They did not look into crystal ball to see the many devious ways people in the future would/could prostitute the framework and conditions laid out in their and our Constitution. Using many previous comments and those made in this blog along with another reading of the requirements for POTUSA it appears to me that to remove Obama from office there are two factors that must be established ad arguably so.
1) He has to be proven to have violated his oath of office and within such done irreparable damage to the USA. I believe there are valid arguments for this as of today but not surmountable over today’s political quagmire.
2) He was and is not eligible by virtue of not having an eligible citizenship birth. I believe this is a feasible factor and is being pursued by quite a number of persons such as myself. It is obvious that this is and will be a tough ‘row to hoe’ because of Obama’s obfuscation of his history, disinclination of congress people to ‘upset the apple cart’, the public smoke screens put out to keep Obama enabled, the large number of people and other societal values of 50% or 30%, who for their own reasons and purposes just want to have Obama as POTUSA.
As for me I will keep taking and placing dots so that #2 results, the sooner the better.


37 posted on 03/22/2014 10:42:49 PM PDT by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777; thecodont

I don’t think so... I am quite optimistic, actually. I think the wind has changed, to a favorable direction. But choppy seas ahead, too.


38 posted on 03/22/2014 11:01:43 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp; thecodont; null and void; Velveeta; Rushmore Rocks; Oorang; Myrddin; MamaDearest; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

The title of the WND article on the 7-2 Alabama case is misleading, but Chief Justice Moore did make some very interesting comments...

Thanks to Seizethecarp, and thecodont.

39 posted on 03/23/2014 12:18:29 AM PDT by LucyT (If you're NOT paranoid, you don't know what's going on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Huskerfan44

Enforced by who? That is the problem. None of the laws/Constitution matter, unless the PEOPLE have a way to force those laws to be enforced. As long as the people who are in a position to enforce are dependent on the crooked politicians/party people to get there, they will never prosecute the crimes committed by the politicians/party shuysters.

Somehow there has to be an avenue for we the people to hold the system accountable to the law. And it can’t just be through elections, because those are easily manipulated. We need a REAL way for people to charge officials with crimes.

You and I should be able to have Pelosi arrested, on the basis of the evidence that she perjured herself on Obama’s OCON, for instance. And we should be able to have Antonio Villagairoso arrested too. And Alice Travers Germond. Bob Bauer should be rotting in prison already, as should Robert Gibbs.

The only way these people have stayed out of prison is because the people have been told they can’t do anything about it. Why have we not shown up at our state AG’s offices in such large numbers that they can’t even get the door open, to protest the lily-livered, lawless political crony-ism that lets these crimes go unchecked?

Because we deserve to have tyrants over us. We deserve the loss of the United States of America, and that’s what we’ve got. She is dead. There are people who have wanted to preserve the US but they didn’t have the courage to do what had to be done, because they were demoralized by MOLES, which are a million times worse than simple “trolls”/sock puppets. People we thought were our “friends”. Everywhere. We were all led to believe that the systems were intact when in fact the systems - ALL the systems - were overrun, not only by trolls but even worse, by MOLES.

All the places for people to get their news were overrun. All the places for people to discuss the news were overrun. All the places for people to vote were overrun. All the places where the votes were counted were overrun. All the places where the laws were supposed to be enforced were overrun. All the places where lawsuits were to be heard were overrun. The military was overrun.

All overrun by MOLES. People we thought were our friends but were in reality actors/actresses bought and paid with a price for the purpose of demoralizing us and getting millions of people to believe they could do nothing about the thugs taking over their entire country.

Look around you, right here. This place is not what everybody has thought it is. This place is in the same shape as the country as a whole. The “secretaries of state” here are no different than the SOS’s all over the country. Government “minders” don’t have to wear their labels; they are most effective when they wear camouflage. And when there is no transparency. Where there is no transparency or accountability, corruption is an absolute given.

The most dangerous time of all is when the system is overrun but people believe it is still intact. When the things that are not actionable are allowed to be jawed over to occupy our time and give the illusion that we are among friends but any efforts on actionable things are sabotaged.

We’re being played.


40 posted on 03/23/2014 6:44:41 AM PDT by butterdezillion (Note to self : put this between arrow keys: img src=""/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
Sorry, somebody has to:


41 posted on 03/23/2014 3:23:11 PM PDT by Ha Ha Thats Very Logical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Interesting comment, most heartfelt. I think what you are describing is the destruction of all that is dear to you, by the Left. It’s been going on in the US since Cantor returned from the USSR in the 1930’s, where he translated the writings of Lenin and they were taken up by the Chicago cabal, and progressed through W.E.B. Du Bois, Paul Robeson, then through Richard Wright to Frank Marshall Davis.

It was Richard Wright who accompanied Malcolm Little to The Bandung Conference in Indonesia in 1955, it was the President of Indonesia, Sukarno, who visited Malcolm in the US in 1956, and it was again Richard Wright who accompanied Malcolm to the Middle East in 1959. Twice.

Where both the stepson of W.E.B. Du Bois and Maya Angelou were working for The Arab Voice.

That’s why I posted so much background research on Obama The African Colonial starting five years ago. That’s why Trevor Loudon set up KEYWIKI, to which I contributed material in the early period.

http://keywiki.org/index.php/Frank_Marshall_Davis

Active in all arenas of Chicago’s bourgeoning Black cultural scene, Davis was one of the founding members of the late-1930s South Side Writers’ Group associated with Richard Wright, as well as a prominent participant in events organized by the South Side Community Art Center and the Abraham Lincoln School throughout the 1940s.

~~~

McCarthy would appear to be the last great patriot you had.


42 posted on 03/24/2014 7:23:25 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

DISCOVER THE NETWORKS
EXCERPT:

...Axelrod graduated from New York’s Stuyvesant High School in June 1972 and enrolled, that fall, at the University of Chicago, where he majored in political science and wrote for the student newspaper. In late 1973 or early 1974, he secured a job as a political columnist for the Hyde Park Herald, a local weekly newspaper. His work at the Herald caught the attention of two particularly noteworthy individuals, David Canter and Don Rose:

David Canter (1923-2004) was the son of Harry Jacob Canter, a lifelong communist who: served as secretary of the Boston Communist Party; ran for governor of Massachusetts on the Communist Party ticket in 1930; earned a special invitation to Joseph Stalin’s USSR in 1932; worked in Moscow as an official translator of Lenin’s writings; and later taught at the Abraham Lincoln School, an infamous Chicago-based front that indoctrinated students in the teachings of Marx and Lenin. Like his father, David Canter was also a lifelong communist. He was educated in Stalin’s Soviet Union from 1932-37, before returning with his family to the United States. He later became an attorney and developed ties to the National Lawyers Guild. In the Guide to Subversive Organizations and Publications, an exhaustive Congressional analysis compiled between 1955 and 1968, Canter’s name appeared 25 times. On July 12, 1962, Canter was subpoenaed to testify before the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC), where he was questioned about the agendas of Translation World Publishers, the pro-Soviet, Soviet-subsidized publishing house he had co-created with LeRoy Wolins, a well-known communist. Canter refused to answer any HUAC questions about his past or present membership in the Communist Party USA (CPUSA). Canter’s associate, Don Rose (who is still alive), was never proven to be a CPUSA member. He was, however, a member of the National Mobilization Committee to End the War in Vietnam, an organization replete with communists and Sixties radicals. He also belonged to the Alliance to End Repression (a suspected Communist Party front), and he did some press work for the Students for a Democratic Society. In the 1960s, Rose and Canter collaborated to establish a far-left, pro-communist community newspaper called Hyde Park-Kenwood Voices, which echoed CPUSA propaganda. Soon after meeting Axelrod, Canter and Rose became mentors to the young man and helped shape his political development.


43 posted on 03/24/2014 7:26:52 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Ha Ha Thats Very Logical

I have a funny feeling that the little red cross hides a stupidity.


44 posted on 03/24/2014 7:28:04 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

http://www.trevorloudon.com/

March 19, 2014

Loudon and Beck — Together Again on TheBlaze TV — Exposing The Enemies Within and Without

Salem, Oregon: Anti-Communist and Best-Selling Author, Trevor Loudon will return to Primetime, THEBLAZE TV, March 26th, 5:00 pm ET, hosted by Glenn Beck.

Loudon, a New Zealand researcher and investigative journalist, has been touring America as a modern-day Paul Revere to warn America that “The Enemies Within: Communists, Socialists, and Progressives in the U.S. Congress” are here and that they are endangering America and all she stands for. The book is published by Pacific Freedom Foundation.

“The Enemies Within” profiles fourteen Senators and more than fifty Representatives and their ties to Communist Party USA, Democratic Socialists of America, the Workers World Party and the Institute for Policy Studies, Council for a Livable World and other radical anti-American organizations.

Says Loudon, “I tried to keep the second book to 700 pages, but the communists just kept coming and coming.”

Trevor’s work has been featured in numerous books and articles, thousands of blog posts and many interviews. Trevor was responsible for exposing Barack Obama’s childhood mentor, the Communist Party member Frank Marshall Davis, and for exposing Van Jones, Obama’s communist “Green Jobs Czar,” who was then forced to leave the White House.

See Loudon and Beck back together again, Wednesday, March 26th.


About Pacific Freedom Foundation: A nonprofit organization dedicated to unlocking the covert side of US and global politics. We are dedicated to exposing those in American politics who are ideologically corrupt and not worthy of the public trust. Through teaching, public events, books, pamphlets and reports, we focus on the backgrounds and records of American politicians who support progressives ideals, rather than strive to maintain our Constitutional government, in its original intent and purpose, as set forth by the freedom fighters of yesteryear.


45 posted on 03/24/2014 7:47:04 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Obama, the African Colonial
American Thinker ^ | June 25, 2009 | L.E. Ikenga

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2278969/posts

Most recent item: 959 posted on Tuesday, 11 March 2014


46 posted on 03/24/2014 7:57:42 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

Placemark.


47 posted on 03/24/2014 11:05:46 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: iontheball
This is the same script that we see played out each cycle when Democrats contest elections and demand recounts.

Before the election, oversight boards say that we have to wait until after the election to see if there is "harm," and after the elections they say a complaint should have been investigated before the election.

-PJ

48 posted on 03/24/2014 11:18:25 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks
I have a funny feeling that the little red cross hides a stupidity.

Nah, not stupid, just silly. It showed up in preview, don't know why it's not working now. Try this one:

Image

49 posted on 03/24/2014 11:35:39 PM PDT by Ha Ha Thats Very Logical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Ha Ha Thats Very Logical
Oh, I get it now. I thought "overrun by MOLES" was culinary. Or maybe having to do with immigration reform:


50 posted on 03/25/2014 2:17:02 PM PDT by CpnHook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson