Posted on 10/26/2014 11:39:02 AM PDT by DanMiller
It's called "insanity" and becomes more virulent and more contagious daily.
Here's a definition of insanity:
Insanity, craziness or madness is a spectrum of behaviors characterized by certain abnormal mental or behavioral patterns.
Although the definition references "abnormal mental or behavioral patterns" [emphasis added], the behaviors here involved have become increasingly "normal." Multicultural linguistics are part, but only part, of the problem.
Insane responses to Iran nukes, terrorism support and human rights
As the P5+1 negotiations continue under Obama's guidance, Iran appears increasingly likely to get or keep nukes. Iran knows Obama.
The Iranian presidents senior advisor has called President Barack Obama the weakest of U.S. presidents and described the U.S. leaders tenure in office as humiliating, according to a translation of the highly candid comments provided to the Free Beacon. [Emphasis added.]. . . .
And with the deadline quickly approaching on talks between the U.S. and Iran over its contested nuclear program, Younesis denigrating views of Obama could be a sign that the regime in Tehran has no intent of conceding to Americas demands.
. . . .
Americans witnessed their greatest defeats in Obamas era: Terrorism expanded, [the] U.S. had huge defeats under Obama [and] that is why they want to compromise with Iran, Younesi said.
. . . .
We [the Islamic Republic] have to use this opportunity [of Democrats being in power in the U.S.], because if this opportunity is lost, in future we may not have such an opportunity again, Younesi said. [Emphasis added.]
. . . .
The criticism of Obama echoes comments made recently by other world leaders and even former members of the presidents own staff, such as Former Defense Secretary Robert Gates.
Do enough of us, and of perhaps greater importance enough of our "leaders," know Him as well as Iran does?
The P5+1 negotiations were a scam from the beginning and the scam continues, enhanced by perceived needs to work with the (Shiite) Islamic Republic of Iran to degrade the Sunni (but "non-Islamic") Islamic State and otherwise to "degrade" terrorism.
The Iranian government is well known for its funding of terrorism. The U. S. Government has long been well aware of it.
The United States State Department describes Iran as an active state sponsor of terrorism.[2] US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice elaborated stating, "Iran has been the country that has been in many ways a kind of central banker for terrorism in important regions like Lebanon through Hezbollah in the Middle East, in the Palestinian Territories, and we have deep concerns about what Iran is doing in the south of Iraq."[1]
So is the Obama Administration.
In July 2012, the United States State Department released a report on terrorism around the world in 2011. The report states that "Iran remained an active state sponsor of terrorism in 2011 and increased its terrorist-related activity" and that "Iran also continued to provide financial, material, and logistical support for terrorist and militant groups throughout the Middle East and Central Asia." The report states that Iran has continued to provide "lethal support, including weapons, training, funding, and guidance, to Iraqi Shia militant groups targeting U.S. and Iraqi forces, as well as civilians," despite pledging to support the stabilization of Iraq, and that the Qods Force provided training to the Taliban in Afghanistan on "small unit tactics, small arms, explosives, and indirect fire weapons, such as mortars, artillery, and rockets." The report further states that Iran has provided weapons and training to the Assad regime in Syria which has launched a brutal crackdown on Syrian rebels, as well as providing weapons, training, and funding to Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command, among others, and has assisted in rearming Hizballah. [Emphasis added.]
Iran is also remarkable for its failure to provide even minimal human rights. For example, it has been reported that Iran executed more than four hundred people during the first half of 2014. That's more than two per day.
Despite Irans state anti-Semitism, the recent arrest of U.S. journalists, and the continued oppression of women, the Obama administration has been attempting a rapprochement with the Iranian regime. Fending off Iran hawks in Congress and the D.C. punditocracy, the administration has argued for a policy of constructive engagement, pursuing diplomacy over military action to halt Irans nuclear program. The execution of two gay men, while it may not be surprising, certainly doesnt make that engagement any easier.Irans cooperation also is seen as essential to managing the chaos in Iraq and the Islamic State. With U.S. airstrikes against the Sunni militants, on-off (now definitely off) support of Iraqs Shiite (ex-) Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, and the possible disintegration of Iraq, this cooperationor at least not overt oppositionis surely of more strategic importance than the latest human rights abuse. [Emphasis added.]
The execution of Rayhaneh Jabbari is the most recent of such atrocities announced by Iran. Please see also Irans Hanging Machine to Execute Reyhaneh Jabbari and Goodbye, Dear Mum: Iran Executes Rayhaneh Jabbari UPDATED.
Iran's support for terrorism, abysmal violation of even the most basic human rights -- and what these Iranian characteristics suggest that Iran is likely to do with its nukes -- appear to be deemed of no importance by the P5+1 negotiators.
Domestic terrorism
Terrorism is often labeled "workplace violence," a "traffic accident" or just about anything but Islamic. This is from Jihad Watch:
A traffic incident in Jerusalem. Another traffic incident in Canada just a few days ago. Odd coincidence: both drivers were devout Muslims who killed Infidels in the name of Allah (as the Canadian bad driver put it). Meanwhile, also in Canada, a mentally ill man shoots up the Parliament building and murders a soldier. And in New York City, a man wielding a hatchet injures several police officers. Another odd coincidence: both the Canadian mentally ill man and the New York hatchet-wielder were also devout Muslims. The father of the former waged jihad in Libya, and the latter called for armed revolt in the U.S. But you must put all of these odd coincidences out of your mind right now. We know that none of this can have anything to do with Islam, and that greasy Islamophobes are the only ones who think otherwise.Memo from US Consulate refers to Jerusalem terror attack as traffic incident,' by Itamar Eichner, Ynet News, October 24, 2014 (thanks to Hamish):
Hours after a Palestinian terrorist drove his car into a crowd waiting at a light rail station in Jerusalem, the US consulate in the city issued a memo referring to the attack as a traffic incident.
A three-month-old baby was killed and seven other people were wounded when Abdel Rahman a-Shaludi drove his car across incoming traffic to strike the people waiting at the station. The baby girl, Chaya Zissel Braun, had American citizenship.
The memo was sent to employees of the American consulate, which is based in East Jerusalem. It asks staff to report any emergency.
AnneinPT (Israel) provides an actual Associated Press news headline about the "traffic accident." "Israeli police shoot man in east Jerusalem."
Here's how the AP, consistently with its customary reporting on things Israeli, might treat Palestinian rockets thwarted by Israel's Iron Dome defense system: "Palestinian rockets damaged beyond repair by Israeli counter-measures."
"Lone wolf" Islamic terrorists are exceedingly rare.
[N]umerous examples show that terrorist actors are almost always part of a network who were involved in recruiting and tasking terrorist activity. As Max Abrahms at Northeastern University has observed:Since the advent of international terrorism in 1970, none of the 40 most lethal terrorist attacks has been committed by a person unaffiliated with some terrorist group, according to publicly available data from the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism, which is funded by the Department of Homeland Security and stored at the University of Maryland. In fact, lone wolves have carried out just two of the 1,900 most deadly terrorist incidents over the last four decades.
So why lone wolf? Simply, it was a mechanism promulgated by the CVE [countering violent extremism] industry, with willing cooperation from law enforcement and intelligence officials, to exonerate themselves when a terrorist attack happened. At its core is terror agnosticism: There is possibly no way to predict who will turn to terrorism, so therefore we cant be held responsible when it happens. Oh, and give us more money so we can better improve how we wont be able to predict terror attacks. [Insert added.]
It's Islamic terrorism all the way down:
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6tLWQK2EiOc]
Yet there has been great reluctance to associate terrorist attacks with the "religion of peace." Here are examples of media and official reactions to the recent terrorist attacks in Canada: "CBCs Derek Stoffel tweeted: 'Amid the speculation in the #OttawaShooting in #Canada, its important to remember #ISIS hasnt shown interest in attacks abroad.' However,
Stoffel should have known that in late September, the Islamic States spokesman, Abu Muhammad Al-Adnani, urged Muslims to murder non-Muslims in the West. Rely upon Allah, he thundered, and kill him in any manner or way however it may be. Do not ask for anyones advice and do not seek anyones verdict.
"The hard-Left Vox reacted to the revelation that Zehaf-Bibeau was a Muslim by dismissing the fact as irrelevant."
Not to be outdone in multicultural empathy,
In the wake of the shootings in Ottawa, the police chiefs of Toronto and Ottawa wrote to local Muslim leaders, assuring them of their good will and urging Muslims to contact them in case of a backlash. These politically correct cops appear to have learned their lesson well: after every jihad attack, Muslims are the victims, and need special reassurances.
Eventually, the Canadian terrorist attacks were labeled "terrorism." Even the White House called them "despicable terrorist attacks," without mentioning the words "Islam" or "Islamist."
Finally, NY hatchet attack was terror according to police commissioner. But again, not Islamist terrorism.
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NoUTBCwaDfo]
Voting fraud
In 2008 we the people elected Obama as "our" President. We did it again in 2012. He was viewed by many as the one for whom they had been waiting.
He was seen as the "God of all things."
Fortunately, some seem to be recovering from their dementia.
However, all too many are still infected with insanity and continue to be contagious. Here's a video of James O'Keefe talking with college students about vote fraud:
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_uHDjk3fSc]
Vote fraud is apparently good when done for a "good" purpose.
When Obama spoke about Democrats running for reelection appearing to desert but really supporting him, he said
"So this isn't about my feelings being hurt. These are folks who are strong allies and supporters of me. And I tell them, I said, 'You know what, you do what you need to win. I will be responsible for making sure that our voters turn out.'" [Emphasis added.]
He may not have intended to encourage voter fraud, but "you do what you need to win" may well have been taken seriously by Obamabots. It has, as a minimum, an unpleasant odor.
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8rMh4Vzztcw]
According to a Washington Post study, non-citizens could decide the vote in November 2014.
How many non-citizens participate in U.S. elections? More than 14 percent of non-citizens in both the 2008 and 2010 samples indicated that they were registered to vote. Furthermore, some of these non-citizens voted. Our best guess, based upon extrapolations from the portion of the sample with a verified vote, is that 6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in 2008 and 2.2 percent of non-citizens voted in 2010. [Emphasis added.]. . . .
Because non-citizens tended to favor Democrats (Obama won more than 80 percent of the votes of non-citizens in the 2008 CCES sample), we find that this participation was large enough to plausibly account for Democratic victories in a few close elections. Non-citizen votes could have given Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote needed to overcome filibusters in order to pass health-care reform and other Obama administration priorities in the 111th Congress. Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) won election in 2008 with a victory margin of 312 votes. Votes cast by just 0.65 percent of Minnesota non-citizens could account for this margin. It is also possible that non-citizen votes were responsible for Obamas 2008 victory in North Carolina. Obama won the state by 14,177 votes, so a turnout by 5.1 percent of North Carolinas adult non-citizens would have provided this victory margin.
. . . .
We also find that one of the favorite policies advocated by conservatives to prevent voter fraud appears strikingly ineffective. Nearly three quarters of the non-citizens who indicated they were asked to provide photo identification at the polls claimed to have subsequently voted. [Emphasis added.]
According to Watchdog Org,
With early voting starting Thursday, North Carolinas election board found 154 ineligible voters on its poll lists and officials are examining thousands more questionable registrations.It's necessary for Republicans to win outside the "margin of fraud," and there have already been signs of voter fraud. In Arizona,The illegal immigrants landed on the states voter rolls, courtesy of the Obama administrations Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.
The State Board of Elections said late Tuesday that more than 9,000 additional voters names are being checked for legal status. They do not expect to finish checking before early voting starts Thursday.
A Republican party official in the largest county in Arizona says surveillance tape shows a progressive Hispanic activist blatantly and openly engaging in vote fraud.. . . .
Between 12:54 and 1:04, LaFaro said, he observed a man wearing a Citizens for a Better Arizona T-shirt loudly drop a box containing hundreds of early-voting ballots on a table.
Citizens for a Better Arizona is a progressive group.
The man then began stuffing the ballot box, LaFaro said. I watched in amazement.
In Chicago, Republican state representative candidate Jim Moynihan's votes for Republican candidates, including for himself, were registered as having been cast for Democrats. He noticed the problem before pulling the ultimate lever and it was determined that the machine had been "improperly calibrated." There is no indication in the linked article whether other machines were also "improperly calibrated" or whether any of them were examined to find out. Obviously, voters need to check for whom the machines say they have voted before pulling the lever. How many will bother to do so?
Since voter fraud may be insufficient, President Obama has diligently prevented voters from understanding what He intends to do about immigration soon after the election. Jonathan Turley, Esq., a "liberal" in the old fashioned sense rather than a leftist, wrote this about Obama's refusal to disclose or even discuss His post-election plans for immigration "reform."
[Y]esterday [October 23d] White House CBS reporter Major Garrett broke from the mainstream pack and pressed White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest on a report that the Administration has order material for a surge of immigration IDs of up to 9 million in one year. Ernest called the questions crazy and encouraged everyone not to speculate . . . before the election obviously. [Emphasis added.][T]his Administration is openly withholding any information in its plans for unilateral presidential action despite the Presidents pledge to take action after the election and before the New Year only a matter of weeks. It is a cynical decision to prevent voters from being fully informed of the plans in a major policy area. Regardless of how one feels about immigration policies, it should be condemned by people across the political spectrum. [Emphasis added.]
More importantly, the media has to show some independence from the White House in this and other stories. Garrett is one of the few such reporters to press the point. His extraordinary exchange however was not covered by the mainstream press and, once again, the stonewalling on the issue was again dropped. I expect given the record of the White House corp, such questioning from Garrett does seem crazy. After all, disclosure of such plans might harm the White House in the upcoming election and only a crazy reporter would pursue such a story. [Emphasis added.]
Get your excuses for not voting prepared if you like the status quo:
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=38MNjKNTixw]
If you don't like the status quo, vote and remind your friends to do so as well.
Conclusions
From the P5+1 negotiations with Iran and the failure of our "leaders" even to pause on their path to Iranian nukes due to Iran's abysmal human rights record, its support for terrorism and the dangers Iran already poses for what's left of the free and democratic world -- and will pose in even greater measure with nukes -- to rampant antisemitism to Islamic attacks on and persecution of Christians qua Christians, to domestic Islamic terrorism to voting fraud, far too many are either insane or extraordinarily devious. Those who appear to be insane either do not recognize the nature of our enemies or do not care. Some are perhaps complicit.
As this insidious form of insanity spreads we seem to have no antidote more powerful than reason and common sense, both increasingly rare. Will our enemies have to provide a more effective antidote in the form of an attack on the United States so severe, clear and obvious that insanity can no longer be ignored even by our lunatics?
All that can be summed up by the word "deranged".
insanity is not contagious
the type of mental derangement to which you refer is taught
That's among the ways that it spreads. Ignorance, irrational fantasy-based ideologies and trying to "just get along" with those suffering from them are others.
Leftists are all insane.
Ask Professor of Education Bill Ayers and he will tell you that.
(P.S. - Amoral education is that which teaches a child that being moral is not necessary, and that there is no need to exercise one's conscience.)
All my life it’s been save africa, feed africa, help africa. I say SCREW africa. I’m sick of hearing about africa.
WTH is the definition of insanity familiar to us?
Doing the same thing over and over expecting a different result?
Liberalism is a mental disorder. ALL LIBs are insane. This why they worked so relentlessly in the 1960’s to close mental hospitals and institutions.
COMMON CORE IS INDOCRINATION !!
It starts in grammar school (SIEU - union run)
continues thru high school (SIEU - union run)
and continues into college (SIEU - union run)
and then we wonder why our kids are Socialist ?
I was just wondering if common core was based on post-modernism. If so, it is rotten to the core.
And that differs from what I said how?
Like any virus or bacteria, Islam only spreads if the conditions are ripe. What were the conditions before and how was the spread halted?
It doesn't differ from what you said- you and I are in agreement.
I just specified some of the sources, starting from age 5 yrs old -through age 18 yrs old .
Our children are indocrtinated thoughout their formative academic years; I merely clarified some of the sources .
I didnt even get into adult levels of stupidity.
You were eloquent !
I specified sources, and was less eloquent.
Inerestingly enough I happen to think it is the parents obligation and duty to make sure this doesn’t happen
But it is happening.
we all want what is best for our chilldren
I am reminded:
God grant me the serenity to accept the things that I can change,
Accept the things that I cannot change ..
And the wisdom to know the difference of what I can change, and those things which I cannot change.
That is part of the 'twelve step" program .
Or as we know it todeay : " SELF-CONTROL "
IF you allow others to shape your children that is on you. My child survived because her surrounding family engaged her thinking and corrected false assumptions that schools tried to force upon her
Actually the Serenity Prayer reminds us that there are two true things : 1) I must take action to change what can be changed and 2) I only have control over my attitude
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.