Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Greenfield: America Doesn't Have a Gun Problem, It Has a Democrat Problem
The Sultan Knish blog ^ | Monday, January 04, 2016 | Daniel Greenfield

Posted on 01/06/2016 6:27:13 PM PST by Louis Foxwell

Monday, January 04, 2016

America Doesn't Have a Gun Problem, It Has a Democrat Problem

Posted by Daniel Greenfield

America's mass shooting capital isn't somewhere out west where you can get a gun at the corner store. It's in Obama's own hometown.

Chicago is America's mass shooting capital. There were over 400 shootings with more than one victim. In 95 of those shootings, 3 or more people were shot. 

2,995 people were shot in Chicago last year. Shootings were up, way up, in Baltimore. With an assist from Al Sharpton and #BlackLivesMatter, Baltimore beat out Detroit. But Detroit is still in the running. Chicago, Baltimore and Detroit all have something in common, they're all run by the party of gun control which somehow can't seem to manage to control the criminals who have the guns.

The murder rate in Washington, D.C., home of the progressive boys and girls who can solve it all, is up 54%. The capital of the national bureaucracy has also been the country's murder capital.

These cities are the heartland of America’s real gun culture. It isn’t the bitter gun-and-bible clingers in McCain and Romney territory who are racking up a more horrifying annual kill rate than Al Qaeda; it’s Obama’s own voting base.

Gun violence is at its worst in the cities that Obama won in 2012. Places like New Orleans, Memphis, Birmingham, St. Louis, Kansas City and Philly. The Democrats are blaming Republicans for the crimes of their own voters. 

Chicago, where Obama delivered his victory speech, has homicide numbers that match all of Japan and are higher than Spain, Poland and pre-war Syria. If Chicago gets any worse, it will find itself passing the number of murders for the entire country of Canada.

Chicago’s murder rate of 15.09 per 100,000 people looks nothing like the American 4.2 rate, but it does look like the murder rates in failed countries like Rwanda, Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe. To achieve Chicago’s murder rate, African countries usually have to experience a bloody genocidal civil war.

But Chicago isn’t even all that unique. Or the worst case scenario. That would be St. Louis with 50 murders for 100,000 people. If St Louis were a country, it would have the 4th highest murder rate in the world, beating out Jamaica, El Salvador and Rwanda.

Obama won St. Louis 82 to 16 percent.

New Orleans lags behind with a 39.6 murder rate. Louisiana went red for Romney 58 to 40, but Orleans Parish went blue for Obama 80 to 17. Obama won both St. Louis and Baltimore by comfortable margins. He won Detroit’s Wayne County 73 to 26.

Homicide rates like these show that something is broken, but it isn’t broken among Republican voters rushing to stock up on rifles every time Obama begins threatening their right to buy them; it’s broken among Obama’s base.

Any serious conversation about gun violence and gun culture has to begin at home; in Chicago, in Baltimore, in New York City, in Los Angeles and in Washington, D.C.

Voting for Obama does not make people innately homicidal. Just look at Seattle. So what is happening in Chicago to drive it to the gates of hell?

A breakdown of the Chicago killing fields shows that 83% of those murdered in Chicago in one year had criminal records. In Philly, it’s 75%. In Milwaukee it’s 77% percent. In New Orleans, it’s 64%. In Baltimore, it’s 91%. Many were felons who had served time. And as many as 80% of the homicides were gang related.

Chicago’s problem isn’t guns; it’s gangs. Gun control efforts in Chicago or any other major city are doomed because gangs represent organized crime networks which stretch down to Mexico. And Democrats pander to those gangs because it helps them get elected. That's why Federal gun prosecutions in Chicago dropped sharply under Obama. It's why he has set free drug dealers and gang members to deal and kill while convening town halls on gun violence.

America’s murder rate isn’t the work of the suburban and rural homeowners who shop for guns at sporting goods stores and at gun shows, and whom the media profiles after every shooting, but by the gangs embedded in urban areas controlled by Democrats. The gangs who drive up America’s murder rate look nothing like the occasional mentally ill suburban white kid who goes off his medication and decides to shoot up a school. Lanza, like most serial killers, is a media aberration, not the norm.

National murder statistics show that blacks are far more likely to be killers than whites and they are also far more likely to be killed. The single largest cause of homicides is the argument. 4th on the list is juvenile gang activity with 676 murders, which combined with various flavors of gangland killings takes us nearly to the 1,000 mark. America has more gangland murders than Sierra Leone, Eritrea and Puerto Rico have murders.

Our national murder rate is not some incomprehensible mystery that can only be attributed to the inanimate tools, the steel, brass and wood that do the work. It is largely the work of adult males from age 18 to 39 with criminal records killing other males of that same age and criminal past.

If this were going on in Rwanda, El Salvador or Sierra Leone, we would have no trouble knowing what to make of it, and silly pearl-clutching nonsense about gun control would never even come up. But this is Chicago, it’s Baltimore, it’s Philly and NOLA; and so we refuse to see that our major cities are in the same boat as some of the worst trouble spots in the world.

Lanza and Newtown are comforting aberrations. They allow us to take refuge in the fantasy that homicides in America are the work of the occasional serial killer practicing his dark art in one of those perfect small towns that always show up in murder mysteries or Stephen King novels. They fool us into thinking that there is something American about our murder rate that can be traced to hunting season, patriotism and bad mothers.

But go to Chicago or Baltimore. Go where the killings really happen and the illusion comes apart.

There is a war going on in America between gangs of young men who bear an uncanny resemblance to their counterparts in Sierra Leone or El Salvador. They live like them, they fight for control of the streets like them and they kill like them.

America’s horrific murder rate is a result of the transformation of major American cities into Sierra Leone, Somalia, Rwanda and El Salvador. Gun violence largely consists of criminals killing criminals.

As David Kennedy, the head of the Center for Crime Prevention and Control, put it, "The majority of homicide victims have extensive criminal histories. This is simply the way that the world of criminal homicide works. It's a fact.”

America is, on a county by county basis, not a violent country, just as it, on a county by county basis, did not vote for Obama. It is being dragged down by broken cities full of broken families whose mayors would like to trash the Bill of Rights for the entire country in the vain hope that national gun control will save their cities, even though gun control is likely to be as much help to Chicago or New Orleans as the War on Drugs.

Obama’s pretense that there needs to be a national conversation about rural American gun owners is a dishonest and cynical ploy that distracts attention from the real problem that he and politicians like him have sat on for generations.

America does not have a gun problem. Its problem is in the broken culture of cities administered by Democrats. We do not need to have a conversation about gun violence. We need to have a conversation about Chicago. We need to have a conversation about what the Democrats have done to our cities.

(A version of this article originally appeared at Front Page Magazine.)


TOPICS: Government; History; Politics; Religion
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; banglist; demagogicparty; greenfield; guncontrol; memebuilding; partisanmediashill; partisanmediashills; secondamendment; sultanknish

Front Page mag - A Project of the David Horowitz Freedom Center

Daniel Greenfield Ping List Notification of new articles.

I am posting Greenfield's articles from FrontPage and the Sultan Knish blog. FReepmail or drop me a comment to get on or off the Greenfield ping list.

I highly recommend an occasional look at the Sultan Knish blog. It is a rich source of materials, links and more from one of the preeminent writers of our age.

FrontPage is, a basic resource for conservative thought. Lou

1 posted on 01/06/2016 6:27:13 PM PST by Louis Foxwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell; daisy mae for the usa; AdvisorB; wizardoz; free-in-nyc; Vendome; Georgia Girl 2; ...

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.

2 posted on 01/06/2016 6:28:14 PM PST by Louis Foxwell (Stop Islam and save the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

We do not need to have a conversation about gun violence. We need to have a conversation about Chicago. I love this quote. My dad had a version of it when I was growing up.

I am from Oakland and my dad always said it was such a great city until the democrats took it over. The last GOP mayor in Oakland was elected in 1962 and since that time it became the city you are all now leery of (I’m speaking in general terms of course).

All the major cities have been trashed by the Dems and they have the nerve to lecture the GOP. No wonder Trump has momentum.

The problem with the Dems is that their minds are so open, their brains fall out of their heads.


3 posted on 01/06/2016 6:45:10 PM PST by Mustangman (The GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

Bravo Foxtrot Lima

Regards

alfa6 ;>}


4 posted on 01/06/2016 6:53:35 PM PST by alfa6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

All that verbiage and Greenfield still can’t bring himself to say it, although he hints at it. What makes Marxocrat cities like Chicago, Detroit, St. Louis, and D.C different than Marxocrat cities like Seattle and Portland? We all know it! It’s time we said it! The killing fields are all predominantly black!!


5 posted on 01/06/2016 7:06:57 PM PST by DrPretorius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

All that verbiage and Greenfield still can’t bring himself to say it, although he hints at it. What makes Marxocrat cities like Chicago, Detroit, St. Louis, and D.C different than Marxocrat cities like Seattle and Portland? We all know it! It’s time we said it! The killing fields are all predominantly black!!


6 posted on 01/06/2016 7:13:36 PM PST by DrPretorius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

Here’s an idea.

If people are worried about guns killing people, instead of banning guns, let’s just ban murder.

If banning guns will stop gun violence, then banning murder will stop murder. Right?


7 posted on 01/06/2016 7:17:44 PM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Odumbo photo odumbo_zpslbxndtew.jpg
8 posted on 01/06/2016 7:18:39 PM PST by Mean Daddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

O does not want to save lives, he wants to get another incrimental step in gun control in place. This is about people control.


9 posted on 01/06/2016 7:25:22 PM PST by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DrPretorius
All that verbiage and Greenfield still can't bring himself to say it, although he hints at it

I like Greenfield, but like most conservative writers he just can't admit the obvious...where there are large groups of blacks, there is a high rate of violence.

But having a tough conservative mayor would help. Giuliani's policies eventually cut the the NYC homicide rate by 75%. Most of those homicides were black males killing other black males.

A huge problem in the violent cities is the liberal establishment refusing to admit it has a problem with young, black males. Until young, black males are clamped down on, the high homicide cities will be dangerous. I won't hold my breath waiting for the election of tough mayors to clamp down. Easier to blame Evil Whitey for the problem.

10 posted on 01/06/2016 7:26:13 PM PST by driftless2 (For long term happiness, learn how to play the accordion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell
2,995 people were shot in Chicago last year. Shootings were up, way up, in Baltimore. With an assist from Al Sharpton and #BlackLivesMatter, Baltimore beat out Detroit. But Detroit is still in the running.

Chicago, Baltimore and Detroit all have something in common, they're all run by the party of gun control which somehow can't seem to manage to control the criminals who have the guns.

Pure gold...

11 posted on 01/06/2016 7:55:35 PM PST by GOPJ (The MSM's the thug arm of the Democrat Party. They'll keep a lid on anything that might hurt Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell
A breakdown of the Chicago killing fields shows that 83% of those murdered in Chicago in one year had criminal records. In Philly, it's 75%. In Milwaukee it's 77% percent. In New Orleans, it's 64%. In Baltimore, it's 91%. Many were felons who had served time. And as many as 80% of the homicides were gang related.

I would think it would be higher in NOLA.

12 posted on 01/06/2016 8:02:01 PM PST by BBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

As I have taken to saying lately, most of our homicides represent the resolution of business disputes in the recreational pharmaceutical industry.


13 posted on 01/07/2016 3:51:37 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mustangman

“I am from Oakland and my dad always said it was such a great city until the democrats took it over. The last GOP mayor in Oakland was elected in 1962 and since that time it became the city you are all now leery of (I’m speaking in general terms of course).”

I lived in Oakland right after the end of WWII (from 1947 to 1949) in a very nice apartment house at 410 Fairmont Avenue just a few blocks from Lake Merritt. I went there the other day while in Oakland for another reason. It’s now a black ghetto! The author is wrong! We don’t have a Democrat problem, we have a Black Democrat Problem! Oakland went Democrat in the 1960’s and has morphed to Black Democrat leadership (with the exception of the reign of Jerry The Fairy Brown and one nutty Chinese Commie woman). While the city goes under, the city council members fight over preferred parking places at city hall. In closing, I would add that my old neighborhood isn’t where most of the killing takes place. That’s reserved for East Oakland, a place you don’t dare go during the day.


14 posted on 01/08/2016 8:43:27 AM PST by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: vette6387

You don’t need to say ‘black democrat’. This phrase undermines a perfectly reasonable intellectual point by making it appear to be a racists point. I know many wonderful black people and many stupid white people. I’m sure you do, too. Skin color has nothing to do with the poor and crappy neighborhoods in Oakland. Liberal policies are the one and only cause.

With all that said, Fairmont Avenue isn’t the greatest place. I drive down Harrison Street (nearby) quite often and it’s definitely not my favorite street...at least until you get down over to the Piedmont area. It’s a shame what the liberals have let happen in certain areas of the Oakland. This much I know we agree on.


15 posted on 01/09/2016 9:05:35 AM PST by Mustangman (The GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mustangman

“You don’t need to say “black democrat”. This phrase undermines a perfectly reasonable intellectual point by making it appear to be a racists point. I know many wonderful black people and many stupid white people. I’m sure you do, too. Skin color has nothing to do with the poor and crappy neighborhoods in Oakland. Liberal policies are the one and only cause.”

Sorry, but I stand by my statement and I have a number of black friends who would agree with what I wrote. When you go through the neighborhoods in Oakland that heavily contribute to the city’s position with respect to violent crime, the common denominator is ethnicity. Sure, there are blacks who are, by virtue of their economic status relegated to live in the high-crime areas. But they don’t do much, if anything to help to drive the criminal element out of their neighborhoods. It’s not unlike the “muslim community” never helping to purge the terrorists from their midst. I’ve worked with a black man by the name of Candell, who runs a “private school” in East Oakland for disadvantaged black kids. He is successful because he demands that the children’s parents be completely involved in their children. And they know if they don’t participate, their kids have to leave the school. That is what it takes to fix the problem, but it’s only a start.


16 posted on 01/09/2016 9:20:55 AM PST by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: vette6387

Excellent points all around. I know we agree on most things but, when you start throwing ‘skin color’ into political arguments things get weird and intellectual points get lost to labels and emotions.

I too am disappointed with the decisions of many black people in Oakland (and other major cities). But, I just say “I’m disappointed with their decision” and skip the qualifiers. That’s just me.

Here’s a story I repeat often: My best friend in school was a black kid. We did everything together. When we hit high school he got involved with what I I call “black anger.” He was talking about how everything was unfair and that he had no chance and that white people had it easy. I couldn’t understand his thought process because we both went to the exact same school, had the same teachers, the same problems, got picked on by the same bullies, and my parents were divorced (not his). Still, somehow he felt all frustrated while I was planning on going to college.....and we both lived the exact same experience.

From this experience I learned that people will always find what they are looking for. I looked for and found a positive future. He looked for and found frustration. To this day I tell my kids, “You will find whatever you are looking for in life so, make certain you look for something that makes you happy.

Foot note: My friend ended up being one of those fired up black preachers in East Oakland. We’ve long since gone our separate ways. I went on to college.


17 posted on 01/09/2016 12:13:42 PM PST by Mustangman (The GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson