Posted on 12/18/2016 9:08:47 AM PST by spintreebob
Mr. Trump offered two tweets that for the first time accepted the possibility of politically-motivated Russian hacking.
(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...
Which should be investigated? Which is more serious?
Most vote fraud (I alleged) is by natural born citizens. But some vote fraud is conducted by non-citizens ... mostly legal residents and not illegals.
Why is everyone so one sided in their concern about foreign involvement in our election?
Not to mention Saudi contributions to Hillary’s campaign.
CBS fake news
This is a great contrast.
If the CIA wants to investigate something, why aren’t they investigating the governments of Mexico, Central and South America for flooding OUR country with “unaccompanied” illegal alien and “refugee” voters for the DemocRATS? Hypocrites.
The Democrats are one-sided because they lost. They can't blame Hillary, so Russia becomes the scapegoat. Besides that, the illegal votes/voters support their party, so they will not touch that with a ten foot pole. In other words, it's not a problem for them at all. They are upset there were not enough of them in fact.
How about media interfence? Clearly.
Isn’t it interesting how democrats are so wadded up about Russia interfering in our election but have no problem with Mexicans voting.
Well, we all know the answer to that. They’re not going to investigate their soon to be largest voting bloc, and let’s not kid ourselves about the CIA. It’s ranks are filled with Democrats educated at the Ivies and part of the eastern establishment/globalist wing.
Russia is Obama’s Goldstein. Russia is a convenient bogeyman for anything you want.
The truth is that the DNC cheated Bernie during their primary and colluded with CNN to provide Hillary with questions that would would asked during the debate.
Crickets. And she still lost.
That’s the story: She was such an abysmal candidate with so much baggage, that even cheating and collusion couldn’t help her. All this talk about Russia is a smokescreen.
Obama’s saber-rattling is doing no one any favors. He’s basically creating a foreign affairs crisis for Trump (who had nothing to do with it) for the weakest of reasons just as he leaves . He may be masquerading his own involvement in the DNC fiasco by stirring up the “Russian hackers” meme.
Suppose a million illegals voted? And suppose the MSM STOPPED citizens from hearing that CNN GAVE THE DEBATE QUESTIONS TO HILLARY BEFORE THE DEBATES and sat on all the other damning 'realities' of the emails?
Do a poll... find out which one mattered most.
Journalism is persuasion.As far as “the media” (journalism) is concerned, people who aren’t persuaded by journalism “interfere” with their government. Not “our” government - their government.
How about media interfence? Clearly.
A good example is Donna Brazile of CNN giving Hillary the questions in advance for a town hall. Not only did Brazile cheat by giving the questions ahead of time, Hillary cheated by accepting them. If she was honorable, not only would she have refused the questions, but she would have reported receiving them.
Fake news and spin. Here are the actual tweets:
Are we talking about the same cyberattack where it was revealed that head of the DNC illegally gave Hillary the questions to the debate?
If Russia, or some other entity, was hacking, why did the White House wait so long to act? Why did they only complain after Hillary lost?
I live in California.
Every election cycle there is a massive drive by the usual suspects to “get out the vote” with illegals.
The numbers of votes cast by illegals now are probably in the 2 million range.
MeChA, the spanish newspapers and TV media combine with the destructionist political party in these drives.
In 2012— The state of Florida found 180,000 aliens on the voter rolls.
Likely over 250,000 by Election 2016.
Aliens are deciding the elections in multiple states for many candidates.
Hillary was such a bad candidate that even Putin could beat her.
If you carefully read the “leaks” by “anonymous” sources, it would appear that the intelligence consists of the following:
1. This type of hacking tool (this particular phishing tool) is associated with Russian hackers.
2. Russian hackers would not dare hack the DNC or John Podesta without the approval of the Russian government, and in particular the personal approval of Putin.
That appears to be it. Very weak. Hacking tools get shared around the dark web, and there is nothing unusual about a phishing attempt. The FBI confirmed to the RNC that the RNC received the same phishing attempt, but the RNC was not stupid enough to click on it. That Putin is involved is just surmise. Indeed, you could probably find evidence of Russian or Chinese “hacking attempts” on every significant computer system in the Washington, D.C., area.
Since it is a practical certainty that the Russians were among the five foreign intel agencies that hacked Hillary’s server, why did they release the DNC emails and not Hillary’s deleted emails, if it was the Russians?
On the other hand, we have Wikileaks, which no one has caught in a false statement in ten years of operation, saying that an insider leaked the information, not through hacking.
The fact that the CIA refuses to go before the Congressional intel committees and discuss their evidence says a lot.
This appears to be an attempt by Brennan and the CIA (a supposedly non-partisan US government entity) to interfere in the operation of the Electoral College in hopes of affecting the outcome of the presidential election.
We could speculate along the same lines as Brennan is doing that foreign interests were behind the release of the Access Hollywood tape, thus influencing the election.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.