Skip to comments.Modern Day Sins Are More “Inclusive”
Posted on 12/14/2017 6:01:09 AM PST by NOBO2012
Have you noticed how the word misconduct has become the go-to synonym for a lot of words that used to mean distinctly different things? For example:
Sexual assault/abuse has been rebranded as sexual misconduct in order to be more inclusive. The ramifications for any behavior along this newly established spectrum appears to be the same: immediate assumption of guilt and swift excommunication. Among the latest victims:
PBS is indefinitely suspending distribution of the late-night talk show Tavis Smiley after multiple misconduct allegations emerged against the show's 53-year-old host, PBS announced Wednesday.
Tavis Smiley excoriated PBS late Wednesday for suspending distribution of his long-running self-titled talk show, saying in a Facebook post that the networks "so-called investigation" into his alleged misconduct had been biased and sloppy.
Oh the irony!
And then theres Supersize Me impressario, Morgan Spurlock:
US documentary film-maker Morgan Spurlock has publicly confessed to a history of sexual misconduct, referring to himself as "part of the problem".
Apparently fast food also turns you into a sexual predator
But sexual misconduct is not the only crime previously known as something else. Heres a partial list of the rebranding effort:
This category apparently still does not include spiking all the news you determine NOT fit to print (e.g. NYT, Harvey Weinstein) but it may or may not include what used to be known simply as the conscious exclusion of pertinent facts with the intent of misleading the reader, lying and making up your sources.
At one time this category was a grab bag of bribery, extortion, cronyism, nepotism, patronage, graft, and embezzlement but now has been expanded to include election rigging and buying votes.
This category has been expanded from withholding exculpatory evidence to manufacturing your own in order to nail a President you really, really dont like.
The political contours and misconduct in special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into alleged collusion between the Donald Trump campaign and the Russian government
However, an expert group of Swedens Central Ethical Review Board, which was also tasked with vetting the study, concluded in April 2017 that Lönnstedt and Eklöv have been guilty of scientific misconduct
In its decision, announced on 7 December, the board finds Lönnstedt guilty of having intentionally fabricated data; it alleges that Lönnstedt did not conduct the experiments during the period and to the extent described in the Science paper. - Nature
I remember when such behavior was known simply as fraud. So the next time you run into misconduct just remember that it could be a stand-in for any one of the 7 deadly sins.
Posted from: MOTUS A.D.
Or my pet peeve, the term “improper” replacing “wrong”.
Still not "inclusive" enough!
Better: "Sexually inappropriate behavior."
(Even better if possible to speak of a "pattern" of such behavior! NOTE: Two times - e.g., once in 1988 and again in 2002) already constitutes a "pattern.")
It is easier to include in “misconduct” any and all contact or lack of contact between male and female humans. Anyone the Progressives feel a desire to castigate can be pushed under this rubric.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.