I Trust Kyle Rittenhouse With A Gun More Than I Trust Alec Baldwin

The Constitutional Conservatives ^ | November 19, 2021 | Daniel John Sobieski

[raptor22]

The Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms and the right to bear arms is what has really been on trial in the Kyle Rittemhouse proceedings in Kenosha, Wisconsin. His use of that “giant gun”, as the lib cable media describes his AR-15, to defend himself has been on trial, not the rioting, looting, burning and killing that has occurred in the BLM/Antifa riots that ravaged the nation in 2020’s “mostly peaceful” protests.

That he successfully defended himself with that AR-15 against a less than stellar cast of pursuing attempted murderers that were part of a raging mob of leftist loons is irrelevant. Kyle Rittenhouse was white, male, and bearing arms the Constitution of the United States said he could, therefore he was guilty as charged. Meanwhile actor and producer Alec Baldwin roams free after killing his Director of Photography, Halyna Hutchins, on the set of his movie, “Rust”, after failing to practice the gun safety gun control zealots scream about. Guns in the home to protect you and your family are dangerous and should be banned. Hollywood prima donnas recklessly waving and pointing guns at their movie crew members are not worthy of condemnation or accountability apparently. The irony in the Rittenhouse and Baldwin cases , aside from Rittenouse being on trial for ending someone’s life with a gunshot while Alec Baldwin is not on trial for ending someone’s life with a gunshot, is that the only truly innocent person to die in these cases was shot by Alec Baldwin.

[dhs12345]

This is good! When a mob of 30 people are chasing you, you need 30 plus rounds. Actually, and extra mag or two would be good, too.

We can bring this up whenever the anti-gun people ask us why we need a gun that can fire 30 rounds.

[faucetman]

“I Trust Kyle Rittenhouse With A Gun More Than I Trust Alec Baldwin”

GOOD one!

[DownInFlames]

Hey kammy, when your temporarily behind that desk, don’t push any launch buttons.

[refermech]

Yup, major error. I think it clinched the case for acquittal

[PROCON]

..whenever the anti-gun people ask us why we need a gun that can fire 30 rounds.

Exactly, this destroys their entire ongoing narrative of; "Why do you need a 30 round magazine?"

[dhs12345]

Perfect. But we knew this fact all along. When confronted by a rioting mob like is so common these days, you need as many rounds as possible. 100+ would even be better.