This weekend: Answering friendly and not-so-friendly critics from Ben Shapiro to the Washington Post. (2000 Mules)

Twitter, Rumble ^ | 5/14/22 | Dinesh D'Souza

[conservative98]

This weekend: Answering friendly and not-so-friendly critics from Ben Shapiro to the Washington Post. Debbie and I discuss new parallels between the Biden regime and Nicolas Maduro. More Dante! Watch! ANSWERING BEN SHAPIRO Dinesh D’Souza Podcast Ep330 https://t.co/cIDqrdwSMA— Dinesh D'Souza (@DineshDSouza) May 13, 2022

[conservative98]

In this episode, Dinesh answers Ben Shapiro and other critics and “fact checkers” of the documentary. Debbie and Dinesh talk about the baby food shortage, how Mike Esper thwarted Trump’s plans for Venezuela, and other current issues. Dinesh examines the discussion between Dante the pilgrim and his great-great grandfather Cacciaguida in the Circle of Mars.

https://rumble.com/v14mfd5-answering-ben-shapiro-dinesh-dsouza-podcast-ep330.html

[enumerated]

How can anyone listen to Ben Shapiro’s whiney voice?

[PghBaldy]

Not interested in listening to nearly an hour of Dnesh. When does he discuss Shapiro?

[marktwain]

He makes a great point. You cannot have a “legal vote” voted in an illegal way. Voting in an illegal way makes the vote illegal, because you lose both chain of custody and any assurance the vote was not obtained by bribery or coercion.

[conservative98]

Click the Rumble link. First segment. Go to 2:15 for the Ben Shapiro part.

Ben is not on. He is just refuting his claims.

[PghBaldy]

Ben talks too fast. It makes it hard to follow.

[conservative98]

Ben’s not on this video. Denish is disputing Ben’s phony arguments.

[PghBaldy]

Thanks.

[TakebackGOP]

You know Ben Shapiro wasn’t going to say the film convinced him of voter fraud. He doesn’t want to align with Trump.

[kiryandil]

Ben Shapiro is an Assistant Democrat, apparently.

[Dalberg-Acton]

Shapiro is good at debating dimwitted Democrat college students. He’s wrong about the 2000 Mules.

[eastexsteve]

2000 Mules isn’t just about exposing the voter fraud. There are a couple other issues it exposes that are just as scary. Watch the movie more than once if you have to.

[Valin]

Translation: I disagree with him.

[Republican Wildcat]

Perhaps - but Shapiro mentioning it and thus allowing people to respond to it got this film far more exposure and discussion.

[TChad]

More of the same from D'Souza. True the Vote has four million minutes of dropbox video, that has exactly one example of a single mule putting ballots into two dropboxes. One example from four million minutes of video. Whoopee.

2000 Mules says nothing about how True theVote's geospatial data was translated into mule maps. Did the technicians who created those maps have backgrounds in such work? Where are the interviews with experts in geospatial data, evaluating the job done by True the Vote? How close did a mule have to come to a ballot box before TTV ranked the visit as a dropoff? Half a meter? 100 meters? The exact number matters. Why don't we know it? What was the quality of the SPECIFIC geospatial data used by TTV. Not the GENERAL quality of geospatial data, the quality of the SPECIFIC data used by TTV. Where we should have details, we have nothing.

Ben Shapiro's criticism of 2000 Mules could be summarized as "Interesting film that people should see, but it does not yet quite prove what it claims to prove. That might change with future data." As criticism goes, it could hardly have been milder.

What evidence INDEPENDENTLY confirms the mule maps as proof of America's biggest conspiracy? Ballot box videos don't confirm the maps, with just one possible exception. No testimony under oath confirms the maps, at least not yet. All we have is Dinesh D'Souza saying "Trust me!"