VIDEO: CIA Congresswoman Feigns Inflation Concern But Voted for BBB

Congresswoman Elissa Slotkin, who loves to brag about being Deep State, has recently been feigning deep deep concern about inflation. How very touching. And yet she voted for the highly inflationary multi-trillion dollar Build Back Broke bill last year. She has been trying to avoid mentioning that very inconvenient fact but a caller put her on the spot about that bill last December during an online townhall session for her district. Oh, and her district is currently the Michigan 8th Congressional District but due to redistricting she is now forced to run in the redder 7th CD this November. That plus the fact that the midterms look to be a disaster for Democrats has caused Slotkin to desperately pretend to be an inflation fighter despite voting for the most inflationary bill of all time.

You won't see Slotkin talking much about her vote for the Build Back Broke bill except in this video which was found via some intense searching by your humble correspondent. It is the very very inconvenient video that Slotkin wishes no one will watch, especially since she absurdly claimed the bill wouldn't be inflationary because Moody's said so, while she laughably feigns deep concern about inflation.

Patriots are reminded that history has proven that the biggest expense of Congress's constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers is the wartime armed forces imo, the military budget for 2022 being $715 billion.

Budget for FY2022

But taking into consideration that most federal domestic policy is based on stolen state powers and uniquely associated state revenues imo, such revenues stolen by means of unconstitutional, post-17th Amendment ratification federal taxes, let's round annual military budget up to $1 trillion to get a rough idea what annual wartime federal budget for all of the fed's expressly constitutionally authorized wartime expenses should be.

"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States." —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
"From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]." —United States v. Butler, 1936.

The bottom line is that organized crime, front-ended by the very corrupt, constitutionally undefined political parties, is partying on Uncle Sam's credit card, obligating taxpayers to pay it off. This must stop and big shot spender traitor members of Congress and a puppet president all removed from office, a process which Trump's red tsunami of patriot supporters must start in 2022 elections since Congress has repeatedly proven that it cannot be trusted to police itself.

Corrections, insights welcome.

Sadly, the Constitution and the Gibbons v. Ogden decision do not explicitly prohibit using deficit spending to pay for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.

Payments on the Debt ARE Constitutional, so Congress (of course) found the ultimate workaround.

Any sane citizenry would throw the freespending hogs into a stump grinder.

"Sadly, the Constitution and the Gibbons v. Ogden decision do not explicitly prohibit using deficit spending to pay for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States."

Thanks for reply.

Allegedly rigging elections have consequences and that's why Trump's red tsunami of patriot supporters must appropriately deal with incumbent lawmakers in 2022 elections.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.