Posted on 12/14/2022 2:37:10 PM PST by jmaroneps37
Of course most of us have never heard of this case but it is huge,
The historic significance of Brunson v Adams ranks with the signing of the Declaration of Independence.
I say this with no fear of contradiction as every aspect of this case bears on whether our Constitutionthat supports the very freedoms that we enjoy and that make us different from third world dictatorships.
Brunson v Adams is THAT important.
This case is at once scary, because the stakes involved are as high as we can go; and encouraging because the Court has accepted it, and the significance of the scheduled hearing - January 6, 2023 is so clear.
Moreover, since the Court has accepted this case, we can justifiably conclude that it has had an awaking
and the dodge of "Plaintiff has no standing," in regard to voter integrity cases will no longer be used.
The fact that Brunson v Adams has been accepted also bodes well for any eventuality that the Lake v Hobbs case could progress to the high court.
This says the Court could very well rule in favor of Lake or if Lake wins in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, decline to hear Hobbs' objections and in so doing, let a victory for Lake stand.
My fellow patriots, we are living in an historic period in the history of our beloved America.
This is your history.
This is your life.
This is real.
Please take the time to read down to the final word.
While as much public attention as could slip by the media censors has been focused on the U.S. Supreme Court’s taking the cases of Moore v Harper and Missouri v Biden, neither would immediately upend the 2020 Presidential Election.
But Brunson v Adams could, which is why you have heard nothing about it.
Despite the news blackout, the thugs that run our government may very well be threatening the High Court’s Justices and their families over the possible outcome of Brunson v Adams.
It is that important.
The case was brought by four brothers from Utah that were outraged that most of the Congress ignored its constitutionally mandated duty to investigate the circumstances of the fake election in 2020.
The Brunsons rightly point out that each member of Congress that helped certify the fake “election” of a “Manchurian Candidate” and criminal, violated his or her oath of office requiring them to defend and uphold our Constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic.
Brunson v. Adams, seeks the removal of President Biden and Vice President Harris, because they were certified as winners in violation of constitutionally mandated due diligence on the part of those that disregarded their oaths of office by their failure to support and defend to constitutional process of certification.
Brunson v Adams also seeks to remove all 291 U.S. Congressional Representatives and 94 U.S. Senators who voted to certify the Electors to the Electoral College on January 6, 2021
without first investigating serious allegations of election fraud in half a dozen states and foreign election interference and breach of national security in the 2020 Presidential Election.
Since this could restore Donald Trump to office as President of the United States, this theory HAS to be what the “crazy conspiracy right wingers” were talking about two years ago.
Of course, those of us that knew and understood the theory of Brunson v Adams never dreamed things would be so bad that the Supreme Court Justices would
blatantly dodge their responsibilities to hear at least one of the many cases that sought to have the clear evidence of rampant voter fraud heard in a court of law.
We know now that the Justices were being threaten and the lives of their families were being threatened as well.
It would seem that things have changed in two years.
In their pro se filing, the Brunson brothers very wisely stressed that the findings of Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe indicating foreign government interference in our national election, made the matter one of important NATIONAL SECURITY INTERESTS.
That allowed their case to bypass a U.S. 10th Court of Appeals motion against its continued progress and get the case to the Supreme Court
The USSC has scheduled a hearing for January 6, 2023 on the Brunsons’ demand for a writ of certiorari which is a demand from a superior court to a lower court that the lower court forward it all of the records of a particular case. A Writ of Certiorari needs only FOUR Justices to vote to grant it so it has a very good chance of succeeding.
A logical question regarding the so far fair treatment the USSC has given this case would be: What was the turning point that forced the Justices to put aside their still well-founded fears of retaliation from the thugs in our government and do what is right and required of honest people?
It would seem that, aside from their threats of bodily harm toward the members of the USSC, the Democrats’ constant talk of trying to use a term limit system to steal the Supreme Court with Court Packing is a likely reason.
Such a system would open the door to a calamitous constitutional crisis of 1860s proportion.
To move their cherished Court packing scheme, forward the Democrats would have to quickly ram through the necessary laws before the end to this current Congressional session – but with these thugs and criminals anything is possible. The fact that it is a violation violations of Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution which gives Justices a lifetime appointment, would legally stop them but their overt contempt for the USSC has already made its impression on the Court’s six conservatives.
The threats to several Justices and their families and the revolution at having to live in fear since the
overturning of Roe v. Wade may have taken its toll on the Justices’ willingness to just “grin and bear it all.”
Instead, the Justices might be viewing the Brunson case as a way remove the threat to our Constitution by walloping the lot of them- one can only hope.
With the recent twitter revelations and other news, the USSC might be ready to act decisively and courageously to be America heroes.
As the Brunson lawsuit argues, all of Congress was put on notice prior to its January 6th vote by more than a hundred of its own members detailing serious allegations of election frauds and calling for creation of an electoral commission to investigate the allegations.
Moreover, the Office of Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) as required, submitted a report on foreign threats to the 2020 Presidential election by December 18, 2020.
That deadline, set by Congress itself, came and went without any action on the evidence heavy report from John Ratcliffe of the DNI.
In fact, John Ratcliffe reported that 17 U.S. intelligence agencies found evidence of foreign election but were not unanimous in their belief that what they found was sufficient to overturn the outcome of the election.
Nevertheless, honest prudence and a search for the truth and fidelity to their oath of office would have required an inquiry to see what the truth was – nothing happened.
Congress pushed it aside and approved the fraudulent election results on January 6th with the help of the feckless quisling Mike Pence.
There is a clear history of what to do in a situation like that.
In 1876, the first time the Democrats tried to steal a presidential election, Congress set up a special Electoral Commission to investigate.
In January of 2021 the criminals in Congress had two weeks to look into the charges of blatant and rampant Democrat voter fraud and did nothing.
They violated their oath of office.
There were plenty of treasonous acts committed in January of 2021 and the Brunson case can be a remedy for the crimes against of freedoms.
Let us pray that the Supreme Court will find the courage to save us.
Be sincere and show support - they need it.
“The historic significance of Brunson v Adams ranks with the signing of the Declaration of Independence.”
Gotta remember this steaming pile when the Supreme Court declines to even have a hearing on the case.
How will the court enforce any ruling?
And they obviously know this.
Bkmk SCOTUS
Judicial doesn’t enforce. Executive does.
It still helps show right vs. wrong to idiots if the Executive refuses to enforce and Congress refuses to hold the Executive responsible.
The awful truth is that we’re likely not going to be able to vote our way out of this.
If the Supreme Court decides not to grant a writ of certiorari, the case is done. This is the fate of over 99% of the cases which are appealed to the Supreme Court.
Much to much is being made of this case. The lower courts rejected it on the grounds of standing. I will be very surprised if the Supreme court grants a writ of certiorari.
The chance of that happening, I suspect, is much less than 1 percent.
“On the docket” just means they received it. These guys aren’t even lawyers. This is going NO WHERE.
The best that the Supreme Court can do is to remand the lower court to try the case.
Lots of possibilities.
This is a civil case. SCOTUS rules in favor of plaintiffs, then it goes to criminal courts. Or, in view of the severity, to military tribunals.
I thought it said they had put the case on their docket for 1/6/23?
You only say that because you’re correct...
P.S. I hear a secret server from Frankfurt Germany is inbound.
I think just as important as this case may be to the author, the one that NC Republicans have before the court is pretty darn close.
If the prevail, then there’s no place for the Left to turn to when they want to manipulate voting laws. If a state legislature passes something and everything is legit, no place to go. And from what I’ve read, NC Republicans have the law on their side.’
They may not be able to do anything about what happened in 2020 or in November, but going forward, if any Republican led legislature has the ‘nads to pass some stricter laws, there’s nowhere for the Dem’s to go. So, no more brining in Elias and his crew of henchmen.
“The best that the Supreme Court can do is to remand the lower court to try the case.”
Well, the Supreme Court could choose to say “we have original jursidiction here” and take the case. They’re not going to do that with this case, and it would be pretty rare for them to do it, but they certainly can do that.
No, it’s just yet another in an endless stream of misleading articles about this case. The case is not on the docket. A plea for certiorari is on the docket.
Correct. I would wager that the chance is about as close to 0% as could be imagined.
That various rightwing grifters are still pumping the mere existence of this cert petition, touting it as significant, and that various folks about are biting on this self-evident grift, is the real tell.
That's the discussion date. The decision to take up the case or reject it is that date.
You don’t really think that any court anywhere in this land is going to take any office away from any Democrat, do you?
You might just as well believe in the tooth fairy.
Honest prudence and search for truth! That’s what we need.
Original jurisdiction means that the Supreme Court is the first, and only, Court to hear a case.
Barking up the wrong tree, Boogieman. It's been heard in both State and District Court.
Exact date and time of Dismissal: 10am ET, Jan. 23, 2023.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.