Posted on 01/20/2024 6:42:54 PM PST by Macho MAGA Man
In June 2023, the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Georgia unsealed the 96-page Halderman Report – the Security Analysis of Georgia’s ImageCast X Ballot Marking Devices.
Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger had been hiding this report from the public for two years.
University of Michigan Professor of Computer Science and Engineering J. Alex Halderman and Security Researcher and Assistant Professor at Auburn University Drew Sringall collaborated on the report where they discovered many exploitable vulnerabilities in the Dominion Voting Systems’ ImageCast X system.
Far-left Judge Amy Totenberg sealed and covered up the results of the investigation of Dominion voting machines in Georgia and sat on the report until this week.
The report confirmed that votes can be altered in the Dominion voting machines. In fact, the report revealed that the Dominion software is vulnerable and can be hacked.
..... Snip.....
After the release of the report, Professor Halderman tweeted that Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger would not install Dominion’s security patches before the 2024 election.
Now this… on Friday, in a Federal Court In Atlanta, Georgia, J. Alex Halderman was able to HACK A DOMINION VOTING TABULATOR In Front Of U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg in the courtroom!
Halderman USED ONLY A PEN TO CHANGE VOTE TOTALS!
This is part of a long-running lawsuit by election integrity activists set as a bench trial.
The plaintiffs seek to remove what they say are insecure voting machines in Georgia in favor of secure paper ballots.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Just because someone claims to be a Republican doesn’t mean that he/she hasn’t been the beneficiary of vote fraud.
In other words, it’s not just Demonrats that do it.
And what if the Demonrats and Assistant Demonrats use their tricks to advance anti-Trump Republican candidates by creating false landslides to give them the appearance of inevitability?
PRAY for Judge Totenberg to get a NON DEMOCRAT SOUL!!
Will “LS” finally accept the reality of Voter Machine Fraud that anyone with an IQ above a bowling ball has known for years & years?
There's a reason why Deep State is now working to get the hand counting of ballots banned. CA has already done it.
It’s also why Deep State loves early voting.
It’s gives Deep State a better idea of how much it has to cheat.
And high tech is the only way to steal a landslide.
Ans: No
- - -
This is an e-mail message, from Marilyn Marks, Executive Directory of the Coalition for Good Governance.
https://coaltionforgoodgovernance.sharefile.com/share/view/s95a64dd5306e431
Her e-mail message includes detailed supporting information re Georgia recount procedures, that you need to view online or download the PDF file (same link):
https://coaltionforgoodgovernance.sharefile.com/share/view/s95a64dd5306e431
Her e-mail message:
Subject: Non-compliant “recount” /”RLA”
Date: Friday, November 13, 2020 at 11:52:44 AM Eastern Standard Time
From: Marilyn Marks
To: Ringer, Cheryl, Lowman, David, Richard Barron
CC: Bruce BrownCheryl, David, and Rick,
The following messages are ones I sent to a reporter in response to his questions on my comments about this topic in today’s BRE meeting about the improper hybrid “all-in-oneRLA/recount” activities that are about to consume your elections staff for the SOS’s partisan political purposes.
Please note that the SOS is asking Fulton to change official tallies after this hybrid exercise that is not authorized by statute.
If this is to be treated as a recount and tallies are to be changed, then it should be done according to statute.
If it is to be a manual hand count, then different procedures should beused (see statute below) than the SOS has instructed.
We are concerned that your staff is going to go through a massively difficult exercise, without authority to change the tallies as the SOS is instructing.
There are numerous other discrepancies between the planned “audit/recount” and the legal requirements of either one.
Note that it has been reported in the press that indeed Trump may request an actual recount after the hand count is completed.
Bottom line is that if Fulton is going to have to endure this exercise, it should have some appropriate legal significance. Perhaps an opinion from the AG would be appropriate before engaging in this hybrid exercise that meets none of the laws. Also changing tallies outside the context of a compliant recount controlled by statute can bring challenges to the county.
Thanks, Cheryl. Feel free to call.
Message to reporter:
SOS is calling this a “recount” and is going to force changes in the tallies he says. That is a discretionary recount, (see highlighted paragraph.) A “recount” has to be done by machine with only limited exceptions. SOS is forcing a hand count without the requisite authority and counties are not going to have authority to actually change tallies as he is claiming they must do.
Notice that he has to have a sworn affidavit (verified petition) from the GOP describing the anticipated discrepancies. Where is that sworn petition?
In her supporting documentation that followed, Marilyn Marks writes:
“Recounts are by machine with limited circumstances for hand counting (court order or scanners that do not work.)
See below.
Audits do NOT change tallies.
SOS is telling the counties to recount by hand (with wrong procedures) and to change official tallies.”
That was the end of the content, her writing in her e-mail message, before supporting documentation.
- - - -
In that supporting documentation, you will find that:
- The Secretary of State has discretion to order a recount [Note, I did not write “hand recount”]
- The Secretary of State ordered *effectively* a hybrid recount
- An actual manual hand recount, may only be performed:
a) As provided under Rule 183-1-15-.03(1)(c)
b) Pursuant to a court order.
Now, that Rule 183-1-15-.03(1)(c):
[I broke the paragraph down into its sentences, for easier reading:]
Prior to conducting a recount, the election superintendent shall test each ballot scanner to be used in the recount.
A test deck shall be prepared to include at least 75 ballots marked by an electronic ballot marker and 25 absentee ballots marked by hand that were cast in the election to be recounted.
The ballots shall be selected from at least 3 different precincts, if available.
The selection of individual ballots from a precinct’s ballot container shall be conducted in a manner that selects ballots from throughout the ballot container.
The test deck shall be tabulated by the ballot scanner or scanners to be used in the recount using one or more batches.
A manual hand count of the test deck shall be made and compared to the electronic tabulation of the test deck.
[Here, Marilyn Marks highlighted in yellow, the following:]
If the two counts do not match, the discrepancy shall be researched and additional tests may be run.
If the discrepancy cannot be resolved so that the manual hand count and electronic tabulation of the test deck matches, the ballot scanner shall not be used in the recount.
If, after testing all available ballot scanners, there are no ballot scanners authorized to be used in the recount, the recount shall be conducted by manual hand count.
[There, her yellow highlighting ended.]
Upon completion of the test, the test deck ballots shall be returned to their original ballot containers.
[Here, Marilyn Marks writes (her initials are “MRM”):]
MRM: That certainly did not happen in preparation for this “recount”
- - - -
.
Georgia’s ballots have a QR code for the computer tabulator to read. You have no idea what it says. You also have no idea what the computer does with that information. The “judge” did not allow a proper audit, rather they just counted the same “ballots” again. I know someone who is a plumber with the contract to State Farm Arena. There was no “water main break”. In my lifetime, counting has never stopped on election night. It was stolen. Trump won GA, and he will win it again.
“Far-left Judge Amy Totenberg sealed and covered up the results of the investigation of Dominion voting machines in Georgia and sat on the report until this week.“
How is it legal to hide this information from the people? This is BS.
Shouldn’t all these officials in Georgia be in the lockup already? Didn’t they already admit that there were over 300K fraudulent votes? Didn’t Raffsenberger and Kemp HIDE THE EVIDENCE? With the evidence now coming out, why hasn’t the case against Trump been dismissed and Kemp,Raffsenberger,Willis,Freeman,... been Charged for the FRAUDS they committed?
Well I guess this is an instructional how to provided as a gift to the dem judge. I’m sure that info will go nowhere right judge?
If its not stand alone, it can be hacked. Even if it is stand alone it may be. Paper ballots? They are merely discarded or misplaced.
Will you accept the reality that in states with machines Trump did better and in states where there was paper backup he did worse? (i.e., AZ)
A more important question is, if it was “machines,” why then in AZ where we had PAPER BACKUP did the numbers match?
To achieve that someone would have had to be at EVERY SINGLE PRECINCT knowing the exact number of votes in that precinct and secretly feed in the EXACT same number of paper ballots. This of course, would have had to happen in deep red precincts as well as blue.
Didn’t happen. This was done the old fashioned way, with “Mules” bringing in the paper FIRST via early and absentee.
Stylus - morons
all paper ballots need to be secured with either a number or special watermark type of paper
LOL....dude, you need professional help to grasp real world reality.
But then years as a “professor” at UD appears to have warped any remaining intellectual capability and common sense.
As a former adjunct professor at WSU Business School, officer in a $400M corp reporting to the Chairman and Marketing entrepreneur with partners in Europe & far East, your “kind” is easily spotted & identified.
I will make one last cordial attempt, despite your snide comments, to explain this to you:
*Trump won several dominion states; lost several non-Dominion states.
*In AZ, one of the most contested, there is a paper ballot for every computer “vote.” The two aligned. First understand that the computers, even if rigged, could only affect 50% of the vote-—the rest came in early, absentee, or election day drop off without a computer “vote.”
When you vote in AZ, you go to a machine, which produces a paper receipt you read. Thus there is an electronic vote and a paper receipt vote. If Meester X “hacked” a machine in heavily red Mohave Co., for example, and added 1,000 “votes” for Biden, he would somehow have to within THAT DAY appear at THAT PARTICULAR PRECINCT in Mohave, and INJECT PRECISELY THAT NUMBER of paper ballots. Since Mohave is red, that would never happen. But even in Pima or Maricopa, you’d have to literally
1) hack the computer of SPECIFIC PRECINCTS
2) GO to those specific precincts
3) Somehow, without anyone challenging, contesting, or complaining manage to find the paper vote boxes and dump in that EXACT NUMBER OF BALLOTS.
4) Rinse and repeat at every single precinct where you wanted to cheat.
Now, NO precinct reported an unusual number of paper ballots.
ALL reported “higher turnout” i.e., more absentee, early votes, and paper drop off (via the Mules).
The paper and computer ballot numbers all matched. Again, this only accounted for half the total ballots. The only reasonable conclusion is that the computers were not hacked, and that the margin for Biden came from early, absentee, and drop off (real) paper ballots, i.e., the mules.
There are many reasons to be pessimistic about 2024 being a repeat of 2020 election theft - nothing has been done to secure elections from fraud, and no one has faced consequences for the fraud.
However, at the risk of being called.naive, I do see one difference that might work in our favor and discourage 2020 level cheating:
There were thousands of people involved in the vast 2020 cheating conspiracy, ranging from a few well-placed strategists at the very top to armies of low-level recruits at the bottom.
Leading up to November of 2020, there were myriads of communications, conversations, instructions and even payments at every level as recruits received their marching orders - the vast majority of them oblivious of the fact that they were committing a crime.
It’s called plausible deniability. The trafficking of millions of supposedly “mailed in” ballots was a new thing because of Covid, and low-level mules and mid-level recruiters were all just following someone else’s instructions.
Even if someone suspected they were involved in something wrong - and asked their supervisor - the supervisor could just shrug his shoulders and say this is what they were being told to do. “Because of Covid, there are all these mailed in ballots being returned - the post office can’t handle the volume - they need to be deposited in lock boxes so people’s votes can be counted. You get $10 for every hundred you deliver”.
Even if one of the recruiters was suspicious of wrongdoing and asked the person up the line - the answer could always be a shrug of the shoulder and “I don’t know that’s what I was told.”
I think since 2020 that plausible deniability is largely gone. True, no one got punished, and the fraud cases all got thrown out of court for “lack of standing” - but questions got asked and the question of massive fraud dominated the news cycle for a couple months.
Many who participated must have had moments of fear - did I commit a crime?
Remember the election center in MI where the Democrats put cardboard on the glass so the Republican observers couldn’t observe the count? Think about that. They were probably told to do that and just followed orders. They obviously didn’t think they were doing anything wrong - they knew they were being filmed and that their faces were on camera.
But watching the news and seeing themselves caught doing that - they must have had moments of doubt - even fear that they had been duped into a crime.
My point is - these thousands of people got away with something in 2020 and if asked had been asked they could honestly say they had no idea it was a crime.
But will it be that easy to recruit mules and ballot traffickers this time around? I don’t think so. Let’s say you are a higher level recruiter or coordinator of the fraud - how do you know the person you are recruiting isn’t an under cover whistle blower, say from Project Veritas?
I’m just saying it will be harder to do it this time - people will be asking more questions - questions that can’t be answered.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.