Skip to comments.
Constitutional Ammendment against divorce?? ZOT-TOO LAME FOR CHAT!!
Posted on 03/08/2004 8:35:49 AM PST by jimjones316
Jesus spoke out against divorce, but I can't recall any talk of gays from him himself. Therefore, why is no one trying to outlaw divorce? I'm sure most can agree that in most cases it is morally repulsive, therefore why is it legal? because it is a freedom issue, bottom line. Barry Goldwater would be rolling over in his grave to see REPUBLICANS, the party of freedom, wanting to put restrictive clauses in the constitution, a document that was concieved to GUARANTEE freedoms, not restrict them. I think America needs to just grow up a bit and hopefully these so called "republicans" can remember what it means to be a conservative: some one who wants to let people lead their own lives and for the government to stay out of people's lives.
TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: vkpac; zot; zotbait
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
To: jimjones316
Hmm..
So just because he didn't go over all the Levitical laws governing propriety in sexual relationships means it's okay to marry your sister, your aunt, or have relations with goats?
2
posted on
03/08/2004 8:48:51 AM PST
by
Darksheare
(Fortune for today: Don't believe the Lawn Gnomes. They lie like a stone.)
To: jimjones316
5 posts to your name, four on October 31 2003 when you signed up, and then this one.
Your argument is specious at best.
3
posted on
03/08/2004 8:53:32 AM PST
by
Darksheare
(Fortune for today: Don't believe the Lawn Gnomes. They lie like a stone.)
To: jimjones316
Freedom? How about process and rule of law?
Judicial tyranny is the issue, not homosexual marriage. The American people have expressed their opinion on homosexual marriage through the representative republic we have int his country (see the defense of marriage bill) which is being flagrantly ignored and overturned by the most unaccountable branch of our government, the judiciary.
If homosexuals want to legalize their marriages do it through the system we have, don't lean on activist judges to usurp the power of the people.
The only remedy left is a constitutional ban, and even that may not stop these activists, but it is the only option the majority in the U.S. has.
4
posted on
03/08/2004 8:54:14 AM PST
by
Damocles
(sword of...)
To: Darksheare; hellinahandcart; trussell; MeekOneGOP; MEG33; Toto27; Hillarys nightmare
A strange name choice.....
5
posted on
03/08/2004 9:06:01 AM PST
by
JoJo Gunn
(Intellectuals exist only if you believe they do. ©)
To: JoJo Gunn
Yes.
He tries to explain it in one of his original posts back in October.
But it reads to me like BS.
6
posted on
03/08/2004 9:06:50 AM PST
by
Darksheare
(Fortune for today: Don't believe the Lawn Gnomes. They lie like a stone.)
To: JoJo Gunn
7
posted on
03/08/2004 9:07:18 AM PST
by
Darksheare
(Fortune for today: Don't believe the Lawn Gnomes. They lie like a stone.)
To: jimjones316
PIFFLE
8
posted on
03/08/2004 9:09:24 AM PST
by
MEG33
(John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
To: JoJo Gunn
A strange name choice..... Not for a hard-core Koolaid drinker...
To: Darksheare; hellinahandcart
Well, considering the nature of this thread, and the old saying about first impressions....
10
posted on
03/08/2004 9:15:01 AM PST
by
JoJo Gunn
(Intellectuals exist only if you believe they do. ©)
To: JoJo Gunn; hellinahandcart
True.
I was wrestling with the idea of flagging Admin Mod to this thread.
11
posted on
03/08/2004 9:23:08 AM PST
by
Darksheare
(Fortune for today: Don't believe the Lawn Gnomes. They lie like a stone.)
To: Darksheare
Ah, at least wait and see if he comes back to play...
12
posted on
03/08/2004 9:24:56 AM PST
by
Damocles
(sword of...)
To: Damocles
Well, considering that his previous four posts all occured in October last year with none since until today, that may be a long wait.
*chuckle*
13
posted on
03/08/2004 9:30:24 AM PST
by
Darksheare
(Fortune for today: Don't believe the Lawn Gnomes. They lie like a stone.)
To: jimjones316
I personally agree... It's your personal life and no government should tell you what to do and not to do.
I believe, if you want to divorce someone, go ahead and do it. Otherwise, it might too late in some cases (especially where the abuse is involved)... Am I right?
To: JoJo Gunn
Oh, yeah. I remember this poster (and peculiar screen name) from a previous thread.
15
posted on
03/08/2004 11:06:03 AM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(The Democrats say they believe in CHOICE. I have chosen to vote STRAIGHT TICKET GOP for years !!)
To: Darksheare
Good question...
To: Little_Fish_In_Big_Pond
Little_Fish_In_Big_Pond
Since Mar 3, 2004
Welcome to FreeRepublic.com ...
17
posted on
03/08/2004 11:13:47 AM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(The Democrats say they believe in CHOICE. I have chosen to vote STRAIGHT TICKET GOP for years !!)
To: Little_Fish_In_Big_Pond
*snicker*
The obvious answer is that immorality is immorality regardless of what century it is in.
But... considering the way the original er.. *cough* article is presented, such a question as posed by myself presents itself.
18
posted on
03/08/2004 11:18:52 AM PST
by
Darksheare
(Fortune for today: Don't believe the Lawn Gnomes. They lie like a stone.)
To: Old Sarge
Another one for your review, enjoy.
trussell
19
posted on
03/08/2004 12:11:48 PM PST
by
trussell
(Member: Viking Kitty Society;New Charter member: Troll Patrol...)
To: trussell; 4mycountry; Zavien Doombringer; jriemer
I smell ozone...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson