Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alexander the Great
Oliver Stone | 03/19/06 | Me

Posted on 03/19/2006 5:57:40 PM PST by sit-rep

I refused to go see it at the movies, because of the rumor of the gay thing. Just watched the DVD from blockbuster, and being I swing a hammer for a living, I missed this part of my formal education....Ancient Persia.

Now, there were a couple scenes where "you thought maybe..." or, was there a possible slant in my own mind that they were switch hitters?

IOW, is my bigoted outlook showing me they were indeed pillow biters, or was I seeing true love in friendship back in the day? The came unglued when his Persian wife killed his life long friend? ...or was this another brokeback mountain? Was Alexander the Great a Homo?

BTW... I think Angelina Jolie, even though she was evil in her part, did a fantastic job and should have won an award for it.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; History; Music/Entertainment; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: alexander; godsgravesglyphs; moviereview; oliverstone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 03/19/2006 5:57:42 PM PST by sit-rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sit-rep

sorry... He came unglued...


2 posted on 03/19/2006 5:58:30 PM PST by sit-rep (If you acquire, hit it again to verify...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sit-rep
Alexander's father was certainly homosexual, and Alexander may well have been ~ they forgot to write down that part ~ however, by the time he got to Afghanistan the elders there knew what that bad boy wanted, and needed, so they found him a wife who could ride a horse, pull a bow, and was flat chested.

Supposedly he was happily married ever after.

I didn't particularly like this movie because the directors appeared to have the idea that all the main characters should be portrayed as modern homosexuals who frequent gay bars in lower Manhattan.

3 posted on 03/19/2006 6:06:11 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sit-rep
Try this...

...BTW, I thoght it was a 'good' movie...not a great one...and the homo factor just never registered on my screen.
4 posted on 03/19/2006 6:08:25 PM PST by Khurkris (Don't blame me. I was out the entire day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
I didn't particularly like this movie because the directors appeared to have the idea that all the main characters should be portrayed as modern homosexuals who frequent gay bars in lower Manhattan.

I seen the same thing and agree. I would like to know to what extent this movie is flawed, because I was interested in his quest east. I think I'll get a book or two on it and give em a read...

Thanks for the reply...

5 posted on 03/19/2006 6:13:43 PM PST by sit-rep (If you acquire, hit it again to verify...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Khurkris
and the homo factor just never registered on my screen.

How could it not?? Especially the scene where that one guy, not his best friend, the other very feminine looking ... ummmmmmm... climbed into bed with him?

6 posted on 03/19/2006 6:16:37 PM PST by sit-rep (If you acquire, hit it again to verify...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sit-rep
Now that was definitely wrong ~ not because the homosexual behavior was wrong but because Alexander and all his friends were, first of all, some really tough soldiers.

I doubt there was any effeminancy in any of them at any time. Definitely rough trade all the way around.

7 posted on 03/19/2006 6:18:14 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sit-rep

I saw it, and IMHO the gay scenes were subdued; I thought the movie was horrible. Why? Alexander the Great was alledgedly a stratagic genius; but did the movie give a single example of this genius? No.

The 'action' was a blurry, dusty set of short shots that did not give the viewer any sense of order out of the chaos. I had more questions after the movie, than before I saw the movie. This is exactly what makes a movie a failure, as I knew less after seeing the movie.


8 posted on 03/19/2006 6:19:16 PM PST by Hodar (With Rights, come Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Khurkris
BTW... This stuff is better for all wood work, and a few other common materials...


9 posted on 03/19/2006 6:20:30 PM PST by sit-rep (If you acquire, hit it again to verify...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
Sure, Alexander was a strategic and tactical genius, but Greece had 4 to 5 times the population that Persia controlled.

The Greeks (and Greek speaking barbarians in the region) had done immensely well with the reforms pioneered by Athens ~ credit unions, plantings of olive trees, fostering of new invention to make work easier, etc.

The Persians didn't have a chance!

10 posted on 03/19/2006 6:22:16 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah; Hodar
I would agree again with you. I am a movie watcher so I must bring up Troy in relation to this one. I thought the scenes of war in that movie may have been a little closer to the reality of things as they were. The battle scenes in Alexander were indeed soft, but that may have to do with budgeting and Hollywood's unspoken acknowledgment of sluggish returns for gay scenes in movies...
11 posted on 03/19/2006 6:27:23 PM PST by sit-rep (If you acquire, hit it again to verify...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sit-rep
If you want a lot of opinions, you can always read at IMDb.

I liked this from their quote section:)

Ptolemy: "It was said later that Alexander was never defeated in his lifetime, except by Hephaistion's thighs."

12 posted on 03/19/2006 7:13:18 PM PST by xJones (A computer beat me at chess once, but it couldn't match me in kick-boxing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sit-rep

I saw on the History Channel awhile back a show or two on ATG, interesting. They replay this stuff all the time.


13 posted on 03/19/2006 7:50:46 PM PST by quantim (A gullible public is the best friend of a weak politician.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sit-rep

I tried to watch the 'diector's cut' [played down the homo angle] on HBO. I found the movie damn near incomprehensible, and I'm a student of military history. Almost makes the earlier attempt [with Richard Burton] and the TV series [starring William Shatner] high art. Oliver Stone[d] is an a*shole of staggering proportions...and conceit.


14 posted on 03/19/2006 8:28:46 PM PST by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PzLdr

I found the movie damn near incomprehensible

 

Phew...I thought maybe it was just me. Although the battle against the elephant cavalry was pretty cool. Improbable, but cool.

15 posted on 03/19/2006 8:31:49 PM PST by Fintan (Did you really think I could post such insightful replies if I actually read the article???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sit-rep

Yes, he was. But, it all came about because of the ABSOLUTE POWER he obtained. He ended the life of anyone who vehemently disagreed with him. Philip of Macedon, his father, most notably. Remember the saying, Absolute power, corrupts absolutely...


16 posted on 03/20/2006 7:40:57 AM PST by Mrs. Darla Ruth Schwerin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sit-rep
Homosexuality was commonplace in the ancient world; in ancient Sparta it was compulsory. Alexander the Great massacred at least one entire town in Central Asia -- one filled with the descendants of Greeks who had been moved there by the Persians -- and killed a few of his closest associates and friends. I think his mind was a bit twisted; one author attributes his cruelty and unpredictability to alcoholism.

Mostly I think we can attribute Alexander's homosexuality to Oliver Stone.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list. Thanks.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)

17 posted on 03/23/2006 7:56:57 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Yes indeed, Civ updated his profile and links pages again, on Monday, March 6, 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Sure, Alexander was a strategic and tactical genius, but Greece had 4 to 5 times the population that Persia controlled.
The population of Greece was something under 1 million (circa 800,000) by the time of Alexander. The Persian empire was enormous, and controlled the Fertile Crescent and Egypt, and was much larger than that. But the Persian army was polyglot, and included Greeks from Anatolia; Greek speakers had spread throughout the Persian empire, and that probably helped when it came time to put the hammer down during the Central Asian campaign. But Alexander relied also on native troops of various nationalities, just as the Persians had.
18 posted on 03/23/2006 8:04:19 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Yes indeed, Civ updated his profile and links pages again, on Monday, March 6, 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Maybe the population of greater Athens was down around a million, but along with democracy had come the credit union, low interest loans to olive oil farmers, and tremendous prosperity.

Some estimates run all the way to 30 million people in the core Greek area but I discount them by 50% or thereabouts.

Persia, on the other hand, remained lightly populated with a handful of major cities.

19 posted on 03/23/2006 9:19:00 AM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Some estimates run all the way to 30 million people in the core Greek area
Just one that I've seen, and that's yours. The entire and later Roman Empire contained about 50 million people at its peak.
20 posted on 03/23/2006 9:22:30 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Yes indeed, Civ updated his profile and links pages again, on Monday, March 6, 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson