Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Earthlike planets may be common: study
Reuters ^ | 09/07/06

Posted on 09/07/2006 7:35:32 PM PDT by KevinDavis

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Earthlike planets covered with deep oceans that could harbor life may be found in as many as a third of solar systems discovered outside of our own, U.S. researchers said on Thursday.

These solar systems feature gas giants known as "Hot Jupiters," which orbit extremely close to their parent stars -- even closer than Mercury to our sun, University of Colorado researcher Sean Raymond said.

The close-orbiting gassy planets may help encourage the formations of smaller, rocky, Earthlike planets, they reported in the journal Science.

"We now think there is a new class of ocean-covered, and possibly habitable, planets in solar systems unlike our own," Raymond said in a statement.

(Excerpt) Read more at today.reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: earthlikeplanets; planets; space; xplanets

1 posted on 09/07/2006 7:35:34 PM PDT by KevinDavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; anymouse; NonZeroSum; jimkress; discostu; The_Victor; ...

2 posted on 09/07/2006 7:35:52 PM PDT by KevinDavis (http://www.cafepress.com/spacefuture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

"'We now think there is a new class of ocean-covered, and possibly habitable, planets in solar systems unlike our own,' Raymond said in a statement."



Waterworld! Maybe we could send Costner there...


3 posted on 09/07/2006 7:38:21 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Common yes but among numbers of stars too numerous to imagine and at distances beyond comprehension.


4 posted on 09/07/2006 7:38:31 PM PDT by cripplecreek (If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

"may" be common and ARE common, are 2 different things!


5 posted on 09/07/2006 7:38:52 PM PDT by true_blue_texican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

We won't know until we go. Another reason America needs to be producing physicists and engineers instead of hoping to import them.


6 posted on 09/07/2006 8:26:10 PM PDT by Hawk1976 (Borders. Language. Culture. AAA-0. Free Travis Mcgee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis


Wow.


7 posted on 09/07/2006 9:35:40 PM PDT by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annie laurie; garbageseeker; Knitting A Conundrum

· X-Planets ping list · join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark ·

8 posted on 09/07/2006 10:36:54 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (updated my FR profile on Saturday, September 2, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 75thOVI; AndrewC; Avoiding_Sulla; BenLurkin; Berosus; CGVet58; chilepepper; ckilmer; demlosers; ...
of some interest?

· Catastrophism ping list · join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark ·

9 posted on 09/07/2006 10:41:24 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (updated my FR profile on Saturday, September 2, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
BBC Version:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/5325476.stm .

10 posted on 09/08/2006 12:08:56 AM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( Microevolution is real; Macroevolution is not real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
How did this end up in "chat"?

Anyway, here's more info on this. I was about to post it when I discovered your earlier thread:
Earth-Like Planets May Be More Common Than Once Thought, Says CU-Boulder-Penn State Study.

11 posted on 09/08/2006 4:17:23 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Where are the anachronistic fossils? Where are the moderate creationists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
As many as 40 percent of the 200 or so known planets around other stars are Hot Jupiters, the researchers said.

I imagine the percentage is so high because "Hot Jupiters" are easier to spot, not because there are actually that many percentage-wise.

But is the article saying that 1/3 of solar systems have "Hot Jupiters"? That sounds like a high percentage. Or is the article just poorly edited?

12 posted on 09/08/2006 4:28:24 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk1976
We won't know until we go. Another reason America needs to be producing physicists and engineers instead of hoping to import them. Instead of producing more f*@&ing lawyers!!!!!!!
13 posted on 09/08/2006 5:25:54 AM PDT by nuke rocketeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce
This measures a minimum mass of 5.9 Earth masses for the new planet, which is orbiting Gliese 876 with a period of 1.94 days at a distance of 0.021 astronomical units (AU), or 2 million miles. It is a hot desert rocky planet.

WOW a place to send ALL Islamofascists.

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

(Artists Conception)

14 posted on 09/09/2006 7:50:07 PM PDT by Candor7 (Into Liberal flatulance goes the best hope of the West, and who wants to be a smart feller?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson