Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Masonic Era of Judicial Tyranny.
Based on research using Wikipedia, etc. ^ | now! | Dangus

Posted on 09/12/2006 10:51:48 PM PDT by dangus

The era of the free-masons.

Between 1937 and 1958, an amazing succession of publicly Masonic Supreme Court justices were appointed to the Supreme Court. Collectively, they radicalized American politics. Since their ascension, it can truly be said that every major socio-political change in America has been brought about by judicial, rather than legislative, means. They utterly dominated the Supreme Court during the Warren, Stone, and Vinson courts (1941-1969.) At times, as many as eight of the nine justice were Masonic.

The following is a listing of Masonic US Supreme Court justices appointed in the last 70 years. This is no conspiracy theory; all were very publicly Masonic. Allegations of covert Masonry (such as Ronald Reagan and Dwight Eisenhower) have been rejected for the purposes of this list.

Hugo Black (1937-1971)

S. F. Reed (1938-1957)

William Douglas (1939-1975)

Robert Jackson (1941-1954)

James Byrnes (1941-1942)

Wiley Rutledge (1943-1949)

Harold Burton (1945-1958)

Fred Vinson (1946-1953)

Tom C. Clark (1949-1967)

Sherman Minton (1949-1956)

Earl Warren (1953-1969)

John Marshall Harlan (1955-1971)

Potter Stewart (1958-1981)

Also, Thurgood Marshall (1968-1991) was a freemason.

Today, there are five (okay, four and a quarter) conservatives on the United States Supreme Court. Is it a coincidence that they are also the five members who cannot be freemasons?

Freemasons generally disdain Catholics, and Catholics may even incur excommunication by becoming Freemasons; all five are Catholic: Clarence Thomas, John Roberts, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, and Sam Alito. (Ruth Bader Ginsburg is not likely a freemason, nor is there credible evidence linking the other liberals to masonry.)

Unlike Roosevelt, Truman, and Johnson, John Kennedy was also not masonic. His appointments, Abe Fortas (1962-1965), and Byron White (1962-1993) were the only non-radical-leftists for several years on the court. Nixon, a Quaker, was also non-Masonic; Burger, while still liberal, was decidedly more moderate than his colleagues. Rehnquist was decidedly conservative. Unfortunately, the Senate blocked further conservatives, resulting in the selection of Lewis Powell, Jr.

Gerald Ford was a Freemason, and his selection, John Paul Stevens, while not publicly Masonic, continued the radical policies of prior freemasons. Was Stevens simply covertly Masonic? Sources alleging he was are not reliable, but his ties are definite.

Today, there are five (okay, four and a quarter) conservatives on the United States Supreme Court. Is it a coincidence that they are also the five members who cannot be freemasons?

Freemasons generally disdain Catholics, and Catholics may even incur excommunication by becoming Freemasons; all five non-liberals are Catholic: conservatives Clarence Thomas, John Roberts, Antonin Scalia, Sam Alito, and moderate Anthony Kennedy. (Clarence Thomas was not Catholic when he was appointed, but was Catholic previously and is currently Catholic.) All four solidly conservative justices have been linked to an anti-Masonic, Catholic group.


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: conspiracy; conspiracygarbage; dangus; freemasons; judges; masonic; masonry; scotus; supremecourt; tinfoilhat; ussc; wikipediasucks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-319 next last
To: dangus
As well as explain why they worship Lucifer

This is pure horse hockey and nobody who really knows need not see any more to know that dangus has no idea what he is talking about.

Yo! Dangus! Ever notice the letter G on a masonic ring? It doesn't stand for Lucifer! Are you getting a clue now?

21 posted on 09/12/2006 11:31:15 PM PDT by navyblue (Semper ubi sub ubi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dangus
I am an avid reader of old newspapers and have seen literally thousands of obituaries.

I find it very interesting that many of the community and civic minded citizens are (were?) Masons. They almost always have a church affiliation and are married with children.

I do not know what goes on behind closed doors at Masonic lodges but the folks themselves seem to not be a drain on society.
22 posted on 09/12/2006 11:31:19 PM PDT by msnimje (What part of-- "DEATH TO AMERICA" --do the Democrats not understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus
Wow, a real Anti-Masonic. That's like meeting a Jacobite or a Whig in the flesh.

What's your opinion on free silver, eh?

-ccm

23 posted on 09/12/2006 11:33:14 PM PDT by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus
A Calvinist church would just try to teach you what the Bible says, that has nothing to do with Masons. The reason you are a Catholic and I am a Baptist is the way we read the Bible. We could joust for hours reciting one verse after another, to no avail. The Catholic ( and other denominations that rely on traditions of men), have been taught traditions that Christ nor the Bible approve of. That has nothing to do with Masonic teaching. Masonry is not a religion and says so from the beginning of the teaching.

As far as Mason founders, you need to read more. The MAJORITY were Masons. Our form of government comes from the Bible and Masonic teaching.

Become a Mason and you can find all these things out.

24 posted on 09/12/2006 11:35:11 PM PDT by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: navyblue

Navyblue, would you like to visit the National Masonic Memorial in Alexandria, and examine the references to Lucifer? I saw what I saw with my own eyes. But as I said, it is not Satanic; I just find it amusing that all the Baptist Masons out there get all worked up about Catholic "idolatry" while belonging to a Luciferian society.


25 posted on 09/12/2006 11:35:29 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: dangus
The word "generally" infers that the subsequent condition

Ahh, you're getting into sentential logic now, which is generall considered passe on FR.

26 posted on 09/12/2006 11:36:56 PM PDT by YCTHouston (Goodbye Flyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ccmay

Would you like to meet an Anti-Masonic Whig?

...well, Old Whig, to be precise. But I am against the gold standard.


27 posted on 09/12/2006 11:38:32 PM PDT by YCTHouston (Goodbye Flyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: nopardons; Chode; TheLion; AxelPaulsenJr; jimt; Eric in the Ozarks; oldtimer; pt17; ...

Masonic

LIST
Send uglybiker a FReepmail if you would like on/off The Masonic PING List
The List of Ping Lists

Heeeere we go again!

28 posted on 09/12/2006 11:40:54 PM PDT by uglybiker (Don't look at me. I didn't make you stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ccmay

:^D

Actually, this started out with me simply discovering the list of black freemasons; I was researching Kweisi Mfume, and had just written about Bob Dole's anticonservative PAC, IMP-PAC. Both were for a thread about the primaries. I was surprised to discover Mfume was a freemason, so followed the link. There I discovered many of the anti-conservative Republicans, like Ford, Dole, etc. I started to categorize the nationally prominent politicians, and only then realized that, while there weren't THAT many Masonic presidents, the core of evil Supreme Court justices (Warren, Marshall, et al) were all on the list, and they were all from the same time. Then I decided to see if they formed a majority clique...


29 posted on 09/12/2006 11:42:56 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: dangus
So you are Anti-Catholic AND Anti-Freemasonry?
30 posted on 09/12/2006 11:44:42 PM PDT by msnimje (What part of-- "DEATH TO AMERICA" --do the Democrats not understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uglybiker

Why is Paul Tsongas flying a UFO?


31 posted on 09/12/2006 11:45:01 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

Where did you EVER get the idea I was Anti-Catholic? I'm most known for my blistering defenses of Catholicism!


32 posted on 09/12/2006 11:45:57 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: navyblue
The G stands for Geometry, not some god.

Also note the Masonic symbols on the dollar bill and in the Great Seal.

33 posted on 09/12/2006 11:47:12 PM PDT by thomaswest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker
To become a Mason, a man must ask a Mason; not the other way 'round.

Freemasonry is not a cult and no matter how many times you say it is, won't make it one.

34 posted on 09/12/2006 11:47:20 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dangus
Dangus, I have no idea what you read in Alexandria. But you either misread it or misinterpreted what you read. I have been a Master Mason for more than thirty years and have never seen anything that even suggests any attachment to Lucifer.

You are just plain wrong and misinformed.

35 posted on 09/12/2006 11:47:35 PM PDT by navyblue (Semper ubi sub ubi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: navyblue
navyblue wrote: "There is a Masonic lodge right here in Los Angeles county that has a Catholic priest as a member. It is not generally known, but the Church has no real objection as long as you don't go into the higher degrees. The Scotish Rite in particular."

Thanks for the information, Navyblue. The Catholic priest Mason I had heard about had not divulged it to his Diocese.

Also I hadn't heard that anyone would be restricted from Scottish Rite, except if they did not take the required coursework and pass the tests.

The difficulty in determining who is a Mason and who is not a Mason is that only men who are Masons are allowed entry into a Lodge. When a Mason sees another at Lodge, then that Mason can be certain that the other person is also a Mason.

The exception is during Lodge family events where non Mason family members are invited to Lodge family events.



36 posted on 09/12/2006 11:48:36 PM PDT by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: dangus
A simply inquiry so I can figure out this post.

What do you think of the Knights Templar?
37 posted on 09/12/2006 11:49:11 PM PDT by msnimje (What part of-- "DEATH TO AMERICA" --do the Democrats not understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Cuz he's gettin' ready to buzz your house! ;-)


38 posted on 09/12/2006 11:52:40 PM PDT by uglybiker (Don't look at me. I didn't make you stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

George Washington and many of the founders were Masons. Seems to me that they did a pretty good of establishing this nation. We continue to prosper and thrive because of their wisdom in creating the institutions of this country. Find another boogieman to scare us with.

BTW The Knights Templar were not prosecuted by the Church for war crimes during the Crusades.

" In the early 1300s, King Philip IV of France (also known as "Philip the Fair") was in desperate need of money to continue his war with the English. On Friday, October 13, 1307 (a date possibly linked to the origin of the Friday the 13th legend), Philip had all French Templars simultaneously arrested, charged with numerous heresies, and tortured by French authorities nominally under the Inquisition until they allegedly confessed. This action released Philip from his obligation to repay huge loans from the Templars and justified his looting of Templar treasuries. In 1312 due to public opinion and scandal, and under pressure from King Philip (who had been responsible for maneuvering Pope Clement V into the Vatican), Clement officially disbanded the Order at the Council of Vienne. Even though all their lands were supposed to be turned over to the Hospitallers, Phillip retained a great deal of the Templar assets in France. Some other European leaders followed suit in an effort to reduce the amount of Church-owned lands and property. In 1314 three Templar leaders, including Grand Master Jacques De Molay, Hugh De Perault and Godfrey De Goneville were burned alive at the stake by French authorities after publicly renouncing any guilt.

Remaining Templars around Europe, having been arrested and tried under the Papal investigation (with virtually none convicted), were either absorbed into other military orders such as the Order of Christ and the Knights Hospitaller or contemplative Benedictine or Augustinian orders; returned to the secular life with pension; and in some cases possibly fled to other territories outside of Papal control such as England and excommunicated Scotland. But questions still remain as to what happened to the few hundreds of Templars across Europe, or to the fleet of Templar ships which, according to novels like 'Holy Blood and Holy Grail' vanished from La Rochelle on October 13, 1307. Also, the extensive archive of the Templars, with detailed records of all of their business holdings and financial transactions, was never found, though it is unknown whether it was destroyed, or moved to another location, or ever existed in the first place.

In modern times, it is the Roman Catholic Church's position that the persecution was unjust; that there was nothing inherently wrong with the Order or its Rule; and that the Pope at the time was severely pressured into suppressing them by the magnitude of the public scandal and the dominating influence of King Philip IV. In 1556, a copy of the Chinon Parchment was discovered by Dr. Frale in the Vatican Secret Archives. The parchment gave direct documented evidence and a new perspective on the Knights Templar and overturned some of the centuries-old myths and misconceptions that have grown around the Order."


39 posted on 09/12/2006 11:54:53 PM PDT by Tarnsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

I find some of their mythology silly, but I don't even know first-hand that they actually believe any of it. Beyond that, I don't have much of an opinion. I should also add that the person who taught me about the knights' influence on the development of Switzerland was a freemason; I should have been careful to make the point that it is Masonic legend, and that it is not me asserting its truth.


40 posted on 09/12/2006 11:54:53 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-319 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson