Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Masonic Era of Judicial Tyranny.
Based on research using Wikipedia, etc. ^ | now! | Dangus

Posted on 09/12/2006 10:51:48 PM PDT by dangus

The era of the free-masons.

Between 1937 and 1958, an amazing succession of publicly Masonic Supreme Court justices were appointed to the Supreme Court. Collectively, they radicalized American politics. Since their ascension, it can truly be said that every major socio-political change in America has been brought about by judicial, rather than legislative, means. They utterly dominated the Supreme Court during the Warren, Stone, and Vinson courts (1941-1969.) At times, as many as eight of the nine justice were Masonic.

The following is a listing of Masonic US Supreme Court justices appointed in the last 70 years. This is no conspiracy theory; all were very publicly Masonic. Allegations of covert Masonry (such as Ronald Reagan and Dwight Eisenhower) have been rejected for the purposes of this list.

Hugo Black (1937-1971)

S. F. Reed (1938-1957)

William Douglas (1939-1975)

Robert Jackson (1941-1954)

James Byrnes (1941-1942)

Wiley Rutledge (1943-1949)

Harold Burton (1945-1958)

Fred Vinson (1946-1953)

Tom C. Clark (1949-1967)

Sherman Minton (1949-1956)

Earl Warren (1953-1969)

John Marshall Harlan (1955-1971)

Potter Stewart (1958-1981)

Also, Thurgood Marshall (1968-1991) was a freemason.

Today, there are five (okay, four and a quarter) conservatives on the United States Supreme Court. Is it a coincidence that they are also the five members who cannot be freemasons?

Freemasons generally disdain Catholics, and Catholics may even incur excommunication by becoming Freemasons; all five are Catholic: Clarence Thomas, John Roberts, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, and Sam Alito. (Ruth Bader Ginsburg is not likely a freemason, nor is there credible evidence linking the other liberals to masonry.)

Unlike Roosevelt, Truman, and Johnson, John Kennedy was also not masonic. His appointments, Abe Fortas (1962-1965), and Byron White (1962-1993) were the only non-radical-leftists for several years on the court. Nixon, a Quaker, was also non-Masonic; Burger, while still liberal, was decidedly more moderate than his colleagues. Rehnquist was decidedly conservative. Unfortunately, the Senate blocked further conservatives, resulting in the selection of Lewis Powell, Jr.

Gerald Ford was a Freemason, and his selection, John Paul Stevens, while not publicly Masonic, continued the radical policies of prior freemasons. Was Stevens simply covertly Masonic? Sources alleging he was are not reliable, but his ties are definite.

Today, there are five (okay, four and a quarter) conservatives on the United States Supreme Court. Is it a coincidence that they are also the five members who cannot be freemasons?

Freemasons generally disdain Catholics, and Catholics may even incur excommunication by becoming Freemasons; all five non-liberals are Catholic: conservatives Clarence Thomas, John Roberts, Antonin Scalia, Sam Alito, and moderate Anthony Kennedy. (Clarence Thomas was not Catholic when he was appointed, but was Catholic previously and is currently Catholic.) All four solidly conservative justices have been linked to an anti-Masonic, Catholic group.


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: conspiracy; conspiracygarbage; dangus; freemasons; judges; masonic; masonry; scotus; supremecourt; tinfoilhat; ussc; wikipediasucks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300301-319 last
To: Eastbound

While Hamilton could have kept membership secret it seems to be totally incompatible with his character to do so. It would be completely in character for a sneak like Jefferson to do that but not Hamilton.

He was forthright to a fault and could have avoided many a constroversy and enemy had he not been so. But he never tried to avoid or run away from a fight.

Though religious he was not a member of any congregation so there would have been no religious reason to hide membership. He was not Catholic which some allege would have prevented membership.

There appears to be no reason for such secrecy.


301 posted on 09/15/2006 8:22:41 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Perhaps he wasn't a member. If a person did not take the oaths of Masons or attend a lodge, that would not reduce the Masonic characteristics of a person. Perhaps it wasn't necessary for Hamilton to experience something he could have invented. Some tend to place too much emphasis on the outward form of Masonry and never get to the substance.

On the other hand, I know some Masons who have great difficulty with ritual and form but exemplify the ideals and tenets of Freemasonry in their lives to a very high degree.

I suppose the same would hold true for religion(s).

302 posted on 09/15/2006 9:08:33 AM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: Eastbound
I know some Masons who have great difficulty with ritual and form but exemplify the ideals and tenets of Freemasonry in their lives to a very high degree.

Which goes back to the question: 'Where were you first made a Mason?'

303 posted on 09/15/2006 12:37:28 PM PDT by uglybiker (Don't look at me. I didn't make you stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: uglybiker

Exactly so, uglybiker. That's why many find that Freeemasonry seems so familiar or second nature to them when they associate. Nothing new to them but the ritual and form -- or even perhaps the discovery of a new migratory path.


304 posted on 09/15/2006 1:51:57 PM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: Eastbound

Wonderful reply; thank you.


305 posted on 09/16/2006 12:39:29 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

Yes, we should! I think that we both know enough to do it. LOL


306 posted on 09/16/2006 12:40:30 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr

I concur.


307 posted on 09/16/2006 12:41:08 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan
Jefferson would not have been permitted to be a Freemason because he was not of good character, nor willing to accept the Holy Bible as the guide to his life... (If looking for an actual Deist, Jefferson would be your man. He even re-wrote the New Testament, stripped of theology.)

Could you source this please. I would be most interested in seeing Mr. J's emendation of the New Testament.

308 posted on 09/17/2006 6:48:54 PM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: jla

"I would be most interested in seeing Mr. J's emendation of the New Testament."

http://nothingistic.org/library/jefferson/jesus/


309 posted on 09/18/2006 6:58:56 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Lezahal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan
aka The Jefferson Bible.
Please refrain from misrepresenting the Sage of Monticello. He "rewrote" nothing. His intent, sole intent, was to emphasize the goodness of Jesus Christ.
310 posted on 09/18/2006 6:19:26 PM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ...


311 posted on 09/26/2006 7:56:30 AM PDT by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, geese, algae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

Freemasonry is a religion, and as a movement is a conspiracy dedicated to the destruction of Christianity. It is antithetical to and incompatble with the Christian faith as established in the Church.

However, the average rank-and-file Mason knows nothing of this, has no part in any anti-Christian activity, and uses his local lodge as a source of entertainment and good business contacts, nothing more. Many good and decent people are Masons, and the local lodges do outstanding charity work. (Another example of the Lord turning evil to good ends.)

Attacking Freemasonry on a broad front is counterproductive. The average Mason is going to find any anatagonistic "debunking" of Freemasonry on the basic of its anti-Christian roots and purposes to be laughably at odds with what goes on down at the local Lodge, and will simply ignore anything one has to say on the subject. A better approach is to present your views on Freemasonry in an honest and friendly way, educating Masons on the origins of Freemasonry and the sinister purposes of its founders without getting into esoteric discussions of cosmic significance. By presenting Masons with the facts about the origins of the Masonic cult -- and by supporting your arguments with plenty of unbiased historical evidence -- one may well plant seeds of doubt in he minds of Masons about the movement as a whole. Planting those seeds of doubt is the goal to be achieved; sprouting them and growing them to fruition is the work of the Holy Spirit. Remember, the average Freemason is not a willing participant in a Satanic conspiracy; he is our friend, our father, our brother, and very often our fellow Christian. Treat him as such, not as an enemy whose beliefs have to be defeated.


312 posted on 09/26/2006 10:54:18 AM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan
Audie Murphy won the Congressional Medal of Honor in WW II. Chesty Puller participated at least in WW II (maimed at Guadalcanal when a grenade exploded between his ankles peeling the flesh from his legs but stayed on his feet and continued to command his troops and in Korea I believe was the winning commander at Cochin Reservoir after the Army fled in disarray; Puller was Patton's first cousin and a maximum Marine Corps hero.

I thought this thread had died long ago. If it continues, please ping me to the party.

God bless you and yours.

313 posted on 09/26/2006 1:30:49 PM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: dangus
Clarence Thomas's parents were not very responsible people and probably were not practicing Catholics. He was originally brought up by his drug-addicted mother in a rural shack without plumbing. His father probably scooted before Clarence knew him. It was Clarence's maternal grandparents in Savannah who stepped in when he was quite young, took him to Savannah, and enrolled him in a school for black children run by Franciscan nuns. In later life, Clarence Thomas always invited the surviving nuns to his swearing-in ceremonies even when he was not Catholic and he always attributed every success to those nuns and to his grandparents. His grandfather was an independent businessman selling fuel and ice and influenced Clarence not only as to faith but also as to capitalism and the need not to be dependent on government.

Clarence entered a minor seminary and studied for the priesthood at a high school level. He left the seminary and the Catholic Faith over racism at the seminary directed at Martin Luther King, Jr. For a time he was a student radical at Holy Cross and then at Yale Law School, married a black Muslim woman who bore his only child, worked with Slick Willy and Hildebeast at New Haven Legal Aid as a Yale Law student, then took a job under then Missouri Attorney General John Danforth who mentored him to Executive Director of EEOC, DC Circuit Court of Appeals and then the SCOTUS. In the process, Clarence became quite conservative, was divorced from his Muslim wife, joined Truro Episcopalian Church in the VA suburbs, and met and married his current wife. After a quite bloody confirmation process, he took his seat on SCOTUS. A few years later, he returned to the Roman Catholic Church.

Of interest, when Clarence was a small child, he was brought up by his mother to speak only Gullah, a slave language still used in some rural black communities as their only language and he has said that English is truly his second language, that he asks few questions from the bench because, inter alia, he is still somewhat uncomfortable with English.

314 posted on 09/26/2006 1:47:58 PM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke
Now, see here! Some children of the Inquisition here who are nonetheless friendly toward Protestants and even toward Masons might resemble that remark!

God bless you and yours!

315 posted on 09/26/2006 2:07:36 PM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk

Gullah, the song Kum ba yah originated in that language.


316 posted on 09/26/2006 9:57:40 PM PDT by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, geese, algae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk

LOL


317 posted on 09/27/2006 4:54:48 AM PDT by Redleg Duke (¡Salga de los Estados Unidos de América, invasor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke

I believe every Fascist leader of the 20th century who colectively almost managed to enslave the world was Roman Catholic by birth........ Must be a coincidence!

Personally I know Roman Catholic, Sikh and Muslim Freemasons, but the vast majority are Protestant.


318 posted on 09/30/2006 4:01:04 PM PDT by Fletch357 (Je Maintiendrai!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Oberon

Membership of the Eastern Star is open to both men and women alike.......


319 posted on 09/30/2006 4:04:25 PM PDT by Fletch357 (Je Maintiendrai!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300301-319 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson