The Masonic Era of Judicial Tyranny.

Based on research using Wikipedia, etc. ^ | now! | Dangus

[dangus]

The era of the free-masons.

Between 1937 and 1958, an amazing succession of publicly Masonic Supreme Court justices were appointed to the Supreme Court. Collectively, they radicalized American politics. Since their ascension, it can truly be said that every major socio-political change in America has been brought about by judicial, rather than legislative, means. They utterly dominated the Supreme Court during the Warren, Stone, and Vinson courts (1941-1969.) At times, as many as eight of the nine justice were Masonic.

The following is a listing of Masonic US Supreme Court justices appointed in the last 70 years. This is no conspiracy theory; all were very publicly Masonic. Allegations of covert Masonry (such as Ronald Reagan and Dwight Eisenhower) have been rejected for the purposes of this list.

Hugo Black (1937-1971)

S. F. Reed (1938-1957)

William Douglas (1939-1975)

Robert Jackson (1941-1954)

James Byrnes (1941-1942)

Wiley Rutledge (1943-1949)

Harold Burton (1945-1958)

Fred Vinson (1946-1953)

Tom C. Clark (1949-1967)

Sherman Minton (1949-1956)

Earl Warren (1953-1969)

John Marshall Harlan (1955-1971)

Potter Stewart (1958-1981)

Also, Thurgood Marshall (1968-1991) was a freemason.

Today, there are five (okay, four and a quarter) conservatives on the United States Supreme Court. Is it a coincidence that they are also the five members who cannot be freemasons?

Freemasons generally disdain Catholics, and Catholics may even incur excommunication by becoming Freemasons; all five are Catholic: Clarence Thomas, John Roberts, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, and Sam Alito. (Ruth Bader Ginsburg is not likely a freemason, nor is there credible evidence linking the other liberals to masonry.)

Unlike Roosevelt, Truman, and Johnson, John Kennedy was also not masonic. His appointments, Abe Fortas (1962-1965), and Byron White (1962-1993) were the only non-radical-leftists for several years on the court. Nixon, a Quaker, was also non-Masonic; Burger, while still liberal, was decidedly more moderate than his colleagues. Rehnquist was decidedly conservative. Unfortunately, the Senate blocked further conservatives, resulting in the selection of Lewis Powell, Jr.

Gerald Ford was a Freemason, and his selection, John Paul Stevens, while not publicly Masonic, continued the radical policies of prior freemasons. Was Stevens simply covertly Masonic? Sources alleging he was are not reliable, but his ties are definite.

Today, there are five (okay, four and a quarter) conservatives on the United States Supreme Court. Is it a coincidence that they are also the five members who cannot be freemasons?

Freemasons generally disdain Catholics, and Catholics may even incur excommunication by becoming Freemasons; all five non-liberals are Catholic: conservatives Clarence Thomas, John Roberts, Antonin Scalia, Sam Alito, and moderate Anthony Kennedy. (Clarence Thomas was not Catholic when he was appointed, but was Catholic previously and is currently Catholic.) All four solidly conservative justices have been linked to an anti-Masonic, Catholic group.

[nopardons]

You can join THE EASTERN STAR; that's the female branch.

[GoLightly]

You sound a lot like some Catholic kids I met when I was young. They told me I couldn't play on the church playground by my home, cuz I was Lutheran & that meant I was going to go to hell. They let my neighbor play tho, because an Episcopalian was close enough.

The secret to building those big Gothic churches was kept by the Mason's Guild & that cost the good Church father's extra cha ching.

[nopardons]

Part of the problem is ignorance; however, the vast majority of it is something else.

[GoLightly]

That reminds me, Neil Armstrong was an Eagle Scout & the Boy Scouts have a secret handshake...

[nopardons]

Correct on ALL points! :-)

Add Glenn, Aldrin, Grissom, and Irwin. :-)

[dangus]

What paranoid aminus?

[dangus]

Read the post again. I got nothing about my post from the Da Vinci Code, or any web site related to it whatsoever.

[bd476]

---

To: dangus

"an anti-Masonic, Catholic group"

What one is that? Knights?

6 posted on 09/12/2006 10:59:50 PM PDT by WakeUpAndVote (Got towel?)

---

To: WakeUpAndVote

Let's just say that there was a recent movie, filled with Masonic imagery, which treated the group that at least two of them have been linked to very poorly.

9 posted on 09/12/2006 11:03:18 PM PDT by dangus

---

To: nopardons

Read the post again. I got nothing about my post from the Da Vinci Code, or any web site related to it whatsoever.

67 posted on 09/13/2006 1:47:22 AM PDT by dangus

---

Dangus, what movie were you referencing in your post to WakeUpAndVote?

[WakeUpAndVote]

"an anti-Masonic, Catholic group"

What one is that? Knights?

[dangus]

Let's just say that there was a recent movie, filled with Masonic imagery, which treated the group that at least two of them have been linked to very poorly.

[dangus]

Read the post again. I got nothing about my post from the Da Vinci Code, or any web site related to it whatsoever.

[catholicfreeper]

I think we need to make a distinction here between Free masons here in the US and in Europe. There are various reason why Catholics cant be Mason and I accept that. However I have many family members that are mason and to be honest it really isnt a cult nor is there a US masonic conspiracy. It is a sad fact in some ways but Masons are dying out as one can tell when one sees the age of the membership at most lodges.

The only kind of Masonic lodges that I am wary of are in Europe for the most part. The famous lodge in Italy for example that was involved in all those monkeyshines. But besides that I think the US bunch are a pretty harmless bunch that in fact do some good work

[sully777]

I'm shocked!

[Xenalyte]

Freemasons generally disdain Catholics

Which is funny, since my dad was a Mason with the dads of many of my friends, three of whom were Catholic.

Possibly more, but I can remember three for sure. And somehow I don't recall Dad telling stories of lodge disdain for the trio. Liked 'em well enough to initiate 'em.

[Xenalyte]

What's your opinion on free silver, eh?

Lord above, don't EVEN get him started on the iniquitous window tax.

[Xenalyte]

The anti-Masonic bunch on FR, are feeling their oats, for some weird reason.

Maybe it's one of those moon-cycle things.

[Redleg Duke]

I see the free-fire zone for the week is the Freemasonry Fraternity.

Well, flame-on.

[Tribune7]

Tom Clark was Ramsey Clark's father.

[Redleg Duke]

"I was offered, and rejected membership."

More likely, you petitioned and were black-balled. Freemasonry does not recruit.

[caver]

Oh great, another Mason bashing thread.

[Redleg Duke]

"...Catholicism is evil because we bow before statues..."

I suggest you review the first two Commandments, or doesn't your religion trust you with reading them.

[stephenjohnbanker]

I appreciate your point. I hold absolutely NO animus towards the Masons. My grandfather was one. When I used the word "cult" it was not to denigrate anyone. I could fairly be considered part of the "physical fitness cult" See definition #2. Top Web Results for "cult" Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.0.1) - Cite This Source new! cult /kʌlt/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[kuhlt] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation –noun 1. a particular system of religious worship, esp. with reference to its rites and ceremonies. 2. an instance of great veneration of a person, ideal, or thing, esp. as manifested by a body of admirers: the physical fitness cult. 3. the object of such devotion. 4. a group or sect bound together by veneration of the same thing, person, ideal, etc.

[Redleg Duke]

"Freemasons were important in the formation of America in several key ways, but they are not the foundation of who I am, or what America is."

True. If it were up to you, America would be a theocracy with Roman Catholicism as the official and only religion.