Posted on 09/30/2007 12:43:23 PM PDT by indcons
I recall the Sooner fans saying the same thing a few years ago.
I don't think Cal jumps that much from their prior position nor should Oregon have fallen as much as they did.
I am perfectly fine with being #2 and settling it in the Sugar Bowl.
With Weis’ contract, ND can’t afford to get rid of him. With the ND performance this year, no NFL team would take him. Tyrone Willingham must be enjoying the ND season.
“I am perfectly fine with being #2 and settling it in the Sugar Bowl.”
Still won’t matter. USC would likely boat-race LSU just like they have pretty much every other non-conference opponent over the past five years (the exception a last-second loss to Vince Young) including 4 consecutive years of SEC opponents Auburn and Arkansas, but LSU and SEC fans would still insist that they were better.
A good question. This isn’t like a coach that took an established football team and made them great (ala Bobby Bowden @ FSU), but Leavitt built this entire football program...it is HIS and nobody else’s. How often in your life do you get to say something like that?
FWIW, I think he’ll stay until he’s tired of it. I don’t think $$ will come into the picture...and besides, who would choose Michigan or Indiana’s winters over Florida’s?
Who knows, he could wind up at FSU after Booby retires.
“I also think this might serve as both a wake up call to USC, as it gives them something to prove...”
I sure hope so.
Speaking of that, LSU had better watch out for Florida as well. I wouldn’t be surprised if Florida makes a strong comeback after their loss.
A moment's reflection should be enough for you to realize I was referring to out-of-conference home-and-home series.
And so, what is the answer?
#6 is good! Not as good as #5 or better, but we’ll see how the rest of the season unfolds.
Look, I don’t want to get snippy with a brother, but it seems silly to argue about who plays a tougher out-of-conference schedule when there’s a conference that makes every single game a challenge, and one you dare not look past. What happens if USC loses one of those OOC games? They’re still in the running for a BCS bowl. How difficult is it when you don’t have to focus much on Stanford (or most other P-10 teams) and can look forward to Cal or Oregon or your tough OOC opponent?
Because I hate it when people won’t answer other questions directly, I’ll answer yours: USC appears to have a very strong OOC schedule, definitely one of the most difficult.
I just can’t see Leavitt leaving USF for FSU, there’s gotta be either a non-compete agreement, or at least a “not to a team with the same letters” agreement.
usc sux.
War Eagle! ;-)
So, why wouldn't the same be true for LSU? And don't mention Stanford without also admitting the SEC's weak sisters. The point is, LSU has the opportunity to settle it fair-and-square on the field instead of outgassing all those bold claims. Why won't they?
I’ll see your “War Eagle” and raise you a “MOOOOOOOO”.
USC needs to know what playing really tough teams is like, so they schedule them for OOC games. LSU naturally has them because of their conference schedule. USC NEEDS the strength-of-schedule boosters; LSU doesn’t. It’s as simple as that.
Show off! Y’all done good though. I’m kinda sorta becoming a Bulls fan.
Honestly, they’re making a big fan out of me, too. When I attended USF, they didn’t even have a football team. In fact, there wasn’t talk of it until my last year. My thought was, “How could you have ANOTHER football team in this state? How could they recruit?” But Leavitt’s done a great job.
I ate lunch paid for by a WVU Mountaineer yesterday, courtesy of the Bulls winning that game.
The only issue with using the “Bulls” as a mascot is...what exactly is a LADY Bull?
34-9 is a struggle? If only all of life's struggles were so difficult....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.