Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Should dating sites allow screening by race?
Super Crunchers (book) | 2007 | Ian Ayres

Posted on 10/05/2007 7:52:09 AM PDT by reaganaut1

eHarmony allows clients to discriminate on the race of potential mates. Even though it's only acting on the wishes of its clients, matching services that discriminate by race may violate a statute dating back to the Civil War that prohibits race discrimination in contracting. Think about it. eHarmony is a for-profit company that takes $50 from black clients and refuses to treat them the same (match them with the same people) as some white clients. A restauraunt would be in a lot of trouble if it refused to seat Hispanic customers in a section where customers stated a preference to have "Anglos only."


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: dating; datingservices; eharmony; interracial; interracialdating; interracialmarriage; miscegenation; race; racerelations; races; racial; racism; racist; racists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: reaganaut1

If you are paying an Internet company to do your job for you, you shouldn’t be surprised if they cut corners in the interest of efficiency. ;)


21 posted on 10/05/2007 8:51:28 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative
I say you should be able to screen by any criteria you want, its your money and life or have I fallen asleep and Hillary won and we have to date whomever the government picks.

I suspect that the author's real complaint is about eHarmony not dealing with homosexuals, and that the other stuff is just window dressing. JMO.

22 posted on 10/05/2007 8:51:49 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
"eHarmony allows clients to discriminate on the race of potential mates."

Since when did we lose the right to choose who our partner may be, you know, the right to free association? I thought my law school was terrible when it came to teaching Constitutional Law, but it appears Yale now has it beat. A scary insight to what this strain of socialists would impose on us if they ever got control.

23 posted on 10/05/2007 9:01:12 AM PDT by Corporate Law (<>< - Xavier Basketball, Perennial Slayer of #1 Ranked Teams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

They should start HomoHarmony and be done with it.


24 posted on 10/05/2007 9:38:38 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I won’t date Bama or Tennessee fans, period. Georgia fans had better put out by the second date or they’re history.


25 posted on 10/05/2007 9:52:28 AM PDT by CholeraJoe (Bring me the head of Miley Cyrus!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe

since when, you liar! you told me that breathing, female and mammal were your criteria!


26 posted on 10/05/2007 9:53:59 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy

You and your memory are quite irritating, xs.


27 posted on 10/05/2007 9:55:54 AM PDT by CholeraJoe (Bring me the head of Miley Cyrus!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe

trying to pass yourself off as all particular and discriminatin’, ya dang ‘bama!


28 posted on 10/05/2007 9:59:35 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe; xsmommy
You and your memory are quite irritating, xs.

Ain't she though.

29 posted on 10/05/2007 10:06:35 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (Fred Thompson 2008, no need to "suspend disbelief" with him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe

No interracial matches on eHarmony?

I see an opportunity for Madame Puddyfoot.


30 posted on 10/05/2007 10:07:53 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NeoCaveman; CholeraJoe

not bad with the prealzheimers i have going on for regular stuff, huh? rest assured that your every indiscretion is being retained for future use.... : )


31 posted on 10/05/2007 10:08:48 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy
rest assured that your every indiscretion is being retained for future use.... : )

And that's one hell of a big file.

32 posted on 10/05/2007 10:12:10 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (Fred Thompson 2008, no need to "suspend disbelief" with him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

As a “white man” who prefers Latin and middle eastern women, I believe I am well within my rights to discriminate in choosing a mate.


33 posted on 10/05/2007 10:15:36 AM PDT by Clemenza (Rudy Giuliani, like Pesto and Seattle, belongs in the scrap heap of '90s Culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

ROLL TIDE!


34 posted on 10/05/2007 10:23:17 AM PDT by chesley (Where's the omelet? -- Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: chesley

What’s funny is that on my street here in suburban Dallas-Fort Worth, we are represented by graduates from Florida, Alabama, LSU, Tennessee and Georgia. Needless to say our block parties on weekends are very interesting.


35 posted on 10/05/2007 10:25:58 AM PDT by dfwgator (The University of Florida - Still Championship U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
I’ll bet they are. I used to live in Baytown, myself, and I have a sister in McKinney, up your way, and a brother in Plano.

Had to move back, though. Missed the Bama barbecue at Archibald's, and couldn’t find anything comparable in the Houston area. :)

36 posted on 10/05/2007 10:30:31 AM PDT by chesley (Where's the omelet? -- Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
If the dating service is a private company, they should screen (or give screening options) as they see fit. [Note that this goes against personal natural tendency on this subject].

However, once a match is found, and if a picture is supplied, dater 'a' doesn't have to choose to actually go on a date with dater 'b' if dater 'a' does not want to.

37 posted on 10/05/2007 1:14:08 PM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
eHarmony allows clients to discriminate on the race of potential mates.

Think about it. eHarmony is a for-profit company that takes $50 from black clients and refuses to treat them the same (match them with the same people) as some white clients.

There's two different issues here from what I can see. One is that eHarmony allows clients to decide a racial preference and yet this author says that eHarmony is not treating blacks the same as whites by prohibiting them from choosing whites?

You can't say that allowing soemone to make their own choices is the same as prohibiting someone from doing something.

38 posted on 10/05/2007 7:44:44 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson