[Dog Gone]

Footprint evidence can never rise to a compelling case. Anything at all can cause an impression in mud.

Show me human fossil remains, not even adjacent to dinosaur fossils, but in the same rock layer anywhere on earth.

Surely if man and dinsosaur co-existed, this would not be a hard challenge.

[Soliton]

Surely if man and dinsosaur co-existed, this would not be a hard challenge.

There is an entire industry selling crap to creationists. Books, movies like "expelled, and geological fakes like these footprints are all money makers.

[Zuriel]

**Show me human fossil remains, not even adjacent to dinosaur fossils, but in the same rock layer anywhere on earth.**

Bear in mind the historical record of Genesis. Man was placed in a world teeming with plant and animal life. Yet man had only lived in a portion of the earth (the Middle East, as we call it today) before the flood came and etc.

**Surely if man and dinsosaur co-existed, this would not be a hard challenge.**

I’m sure people weren’t stupid during the flood, standing around letting the water go over their heads while staying put at home. The landlubbing dinosaurs probably didn’t climb mountains as well as people, hence were buried in sediment first. JMHO.

[null and void]

Show me human fossil remains, not even adjacent to dinosaur fossils, but in the same rock layer anywhere on earth.

Surely if man and dinsosaur co-existed, this would not be a hard challenge.

Clearly you have no concept of how little of a human remains after being cycled through a dinosaur...